Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process


Authors should present their papers honestly without fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or inappropriate data manipulation. Submitted papers are evaluated by anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation by the editor-in-chief and associate editors. Besides, the articles will be evaluated on the suitability of aim and scope, language, writing grammar, template, and similarity. The Editor will inform you of the eligibility of your article as soon as possible, hopefully in 1 to 2 weeks.

Every submitted paper is independently reviewed by at least two peer-reviewers. This journal operates a conventional double-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer's name is always concealed from the submitting author. Papers will be sent for anonymous review by at least two reviewers who will either be members of the Editorial Board and Reviewers or others of similar standing in the field. To shorten the review process and respond quickly to the authors, the Editors may triage a submission and decide without sending the paper for external review. The Editor’s decision is final and no correspondence can be entered into concerning manuscripts considered unsuitable for publication in this journal. All correspondence, including notification of the Editors’ decision and requests for revisions, will be sent by email. The Editor shall inform you of the results of the review as soon as possible, hopefully in 1 to 4 weeks.