STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN JOHN RAWLS DAN MARTHA NUSSBAUM TENTANG KEADILAN SOSIAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/aqidahta.v11i1.57470Keywords:
Jown Rawls, Martha Nassbaum, KeadilanAbstract
This research examines the philosophical thoughts of John Rawls and Martha Nussbaum on social justice through library research methods with a qualitative hermeneutic approach. The primary focus is to explore the concept of justice from both thinkers' perspectives, analyze convergence and divergence points, and synthesize a comprehensive conceptual framework. The study compares four key domains: equality conception, resource distribution mechanisms, the state's role, and the ethical dimensions of social life. Research findings demonstrate that social justice is a dynamic practice that transcends material distribution, emphasizing individual empowerment and human dignity recognition. Rawls offers a procedural approach through the original position, while Nussbaum focuses on core capabilities development. The synthesis of their thoughts produces a theoretical framework that promotes public policy transformation towards a more inclusive and just society.
Downloads
References
Adlini, Miza Nina, Anisya Hanifa Dinda, Sarah Yulinda, Octavia Chotimah, and Sauda Julia Merliyana. “METODE PENELITIAN KUALITATIF STUDI PUSTAKA.” Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 6, no. 1 (2022): 974–80. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i1.3394.
Banerjee, Mahasweta M., and Edward R. Canda. “Comparing Rawlsian Justice and the Capabilities Approach to Justice from a Spiritually Sensitive Social Work Perspective.” Journal of Religion and Spirituality in Social Work 31, no. 1–2 (2012): 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2012.647874.
Kaszner, Corinne. “The Social Justice and Radical Diversity Approach: Combining Structural Analysis and Transformative Practice.” Genealogy+Critique 10, no. 1 (2022): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.16995/gc.9235.
Kementrian Agama Republik Indonesia. Al-Quran Dan Terjemahnya. Bandung: PT. al Qosbah Karya Indonesia, 2023.
Kushwaha, Ravindra Kumar, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Vandana Yadav, and Anita Verma. Diversity , Equity & Inclusion. BLUEROSE PUBLISHERS, 2024.
Massimo, David, and Francesco Ricci. Popularity, Novelty and Relevance in Point of Interest Recommendation: An Experimental Analysis. Information Technology and Tourism. Vol. 23. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-021-00214-5.
Minggu, Arkadius, Norbertus Jegalus, and Petrus Tan. “Analisis Prinsip Perbedaan Menurut Rawls.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Multidisipliner 8, no. 4 (2024): 27–34.
Nasution, Bahder Johan. “Kajian Filosofis Tentang Konsep Keadilan Dari Pemikiran Klasik Sampai Pemikiran Modern.” Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 3, no. 2 (2014): 118–30. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11106.
Nussbaum, Martha C. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. London: Harvard University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061200.
Rahman, Gunawan Santoso, Inrayani, and Adilah Syafiyah. “Pemikiran Mengenai Martabat Dan Nilai Intrinsik Manusia Untuk Melindungi, Dan Memajukan.” Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif (JPT) 02, no. 03 (2023): 355–63.
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition, Harvard University Press, 1971.
Robeyns, Ingrid. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined. Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined, 2017. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130.
Rodiah, Siti, and Abdul Hamid. “KEADILAN DISTRIBUSI DAN PERLINDUNGAN TERHADAP KAUM LEMAH.” Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Syariah 1, no. 7 (2025): 1–9.
Rosyidin, Mohamad. “Realisme versus Liberalisme: Suatu Perbandingan Paradigmatis.” Indonesian Perspective 7, no. 2 (2022): 134–44. https://doi.org/10.14710/ip.v7i2.50775.
Sari, Gholin Noor Aulia, Wahyu Sinta Dewi Pramudita, Raden Muhammad Muhklasin, Dewi Sulistianingsih, and Martitah. “Tinjauan Filosofis Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Lensa Teori Keadilan.” Book Chapter Hukum Dan Politik Dalam Berbagai Perspektif Jilid 3, 2024, 253–91.
Tiopan, Demson. “Implementation of the Principle of Justice in the Formation and Substance of Government Regulation.” Dialogia Iuridica 15, no. 1 (2023): 076–093. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v15i1.7449.
Töns, John. “Global Justice : A Rawlsian Perspective.” Thesis: Submitted to Flinders University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, no. August (2018).
