Comparative Analysis Of The Spherical Trigonometry Method In Qibla Direction Calibration Based On Aulatis At Nur Rahman Mosque Singosari Malang

spherical trigonometry; arah kiblat; Aulatis; akurasi; validitas

Authors

  • Khoirul Anwar Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama Malang

Keywords:

Spherical Trigonometry, Qibla Direction, Aulatis, Accuracy, Validity

Abstract

This study is motivated by the problem of discrepancies in accuracy and validity in qibla direction calibration between the mathematical approach of spherical trigonometry and the use of Aulatis instruments within contemporary Islamic astronomy practices. The research problem addresses how the levels of accuracy and validity differ between these two methods and to what extent their results vary in determining a precise qibla direction. Accordingly, the research questions focus on a comparative analysis of angular deviation, result consistency, and conformity with geodetic standards based on global geographic coordinates. This study employs a quantitative method with a comparative-analytical approach through the integration of spherical trigonometry calculations, field measurements using Aulatis, and verification based on modern geodetic systems. The variables analyzed include calculated qibla direction results, field observation data, and the degree of angular deviation from the theoretical qibla direction. The case study is conducted at Masjid Nur Rahman Singosari as an empirical representation of qibla calibration practices. The findings indicate that the spherical trigonometry method demonstrates higher levels of accuracy and validity, characterized by smaller and more consistent deviations, while Aulatis offers practical advantages in operational use despite being influenced by technical field conditions. These results underscore the importance of integrating mathematical approaches with practical instruments to enhance the precision of qibla calibration. The scientific contribution of this study lies in strengthening a comparative evaluation model based on a multidisciplinary approach integrating Islamic astronomy and modern geodesy, while also offering novelty in assessing the accuracy and validity of qibla calibration methods in alignment with current technological advancements and practical needs.

References

Afaq, A L, dan Misrahul Safitri. “Studi Komparasi Terhadap Akurasi Istiwaaini Dengan Kompas Kiblat Android ‘ M uslim Go ’ D alam Pengukuran Arah Kiblat” 4, no. 1 (2022): 78–94.

Amalraj, J Leo, K R Kavitha, Lalitkumar S Narsingani, Subrahmanyam Sigatapu, Shahid Tamboli, dan S Balamuralitharan. “MODERN APPROACHES TO OPTIMIZATION AND APPROXIMATION IN APPLIED MATHEMATICS : DEVELOPING EFFICIENT MATHEMATICAL” 38, no. 10 (2025): 12–27.

Barazzetti, Luigi. “Revitalizing Astronomical Azimuth Determination : Integrating Modern Computing with Traditional Techniques,” 2025.

Catford, Jane A, John R U Wilson, Richard P Duncan, Petr Py, dan Philip E Hulme. “Addressing context dependence in ecology” 37, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.09.007.

Chatzistergos, Theodosios, Ilya G Usoskin, Gennady A Kovaltsov, Natalie A Krivova, dan Sami K Solanki. “Astrophysics New reconstruction of the sunspot group numbers since 1739 using direct calibration and ‘ backbone ’ methods” 69 (2017): 1–18.

Faiz, A B D Karim. “Historical Analysis and Calibration of Al-Mujahidin Oldest Mosque , Parepare City” 9, no. 2 (2023).

Faiz, Abd Karim, Budiman, Syarif, Muh Rasywan. Questioning the Accuracy of the Qibla Direction of the Grand Mosque (Case Study of the Grand Mosque of Parepare in the Review of Trigonometry of the Qibla Direction). Al-Marshad: Journal of Islamic Astronomy and Related Sciences, 2022.

Faizah, Isniyatin. “Pendampingan Kalibrasi Arah Kiblat sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Ketepatan Praktik Ibadah” 5, no. 3 (2025).

Falah, Fikri Darul. “Qibla laser sebagai alat penentu arah kiblat malam hari dengan menggunakan posisi harian rasi bintang” 6, no. 2 (2025): 662–75.

Fu, J U N, Zhiwen Ning, dan Yang Chang. “Active Compensation Method for Strong Magnetic Interference of MEMS Electronic Compass” 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067362.

Hamas, Nuril Fathoni, dan Abdul Ghofur. “Implementation of Spherical Trigonometry Qibla Direction Formula with Modern Calculating Tools” 2, no. 2 (2024): 43–56. https://doi.org/10.22373/kulminasi.v2i2.5676.

Hidayatullah, Dimas Syarief, Universitas Islam, Negeri Walisongo, Universitas Islam, Negeri Alauddin, Ahmad Adib Rofiuddin, Universitas Islam, et al. “ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF GPS TECHNOLOGY IN IDENTIFYING THE QIBLA DIRECTION OF DARUSSALAM MOSQUE ,” 9 (2025): 231–44.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

Issue

Section

Artikel