Surwandono Surwandono, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Muhadi Sugiono, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Shofwan Al Banna Choiruzzad, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Ani Widyani Soetjipto, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Asra Virgianita, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia



  • Peer review assists the editors in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the authors may also assist the author in improving the quality of the paper.
  • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  •  Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  • Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by a proper citation. A reviewer should also call to the editors' attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  • Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the papers.
  • Peer reviewers not allow their reviews to be influenced by the origins of a manuscript, by the nationality, religious or political beliefs, gender or other characteristics of the authors, or by commercial considerations.
  • Peer reviewers recognize that impersonation of another individual during the review process considered as a serious misconduct.