Comparative Analysis of Judges' Decisions on Debts and Credits as Reasons for Divorce in the Class 1A Religious Court of Makassar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v5i3.49143Keywords:
Divorce, Debts and Receivables, Religious CourtsAbstract
The main problem in this research is related to the Comparative Analysis of Judges' Decisions on Debts and Receivables as a Reason for Divorce that occurred in the Makassar Class 1A Religious Court which aims to find out why Indonesian law does not make debts and receivables a basis for divorce, and to find out what factors are taken into consideration. the judge in granting a divorce case because of debts and receivables. The research method used by the author is qualitative research, which was carried out at the Class 1A Makassar Religious Court. Data sourced from cases 1) 2855/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Mks, 2) 1847/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Mks, and 2) 2847/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Mks, Judges, Figures Religion, Posbakum and Society. Field research techniques are research that is directly related to the research object being studied as well as Library Research, interviews and documentation. The data analysis processing is through deductive, inductive analysis and comparative methods. The results of this research are that the basis for the judge's consideration in deciding the Class 1A Makassar Religious Court decision case is by referring to the arguments of the lawsuit, evidence, and the statements of witnesses. The judge's considerations in granting the divorce petition filed by the husband against his wife were because they had debts for which no solution could be found for peace and harmony in their household. Meanwhile, according to Islamic law regarding the talak divorce case which the applicant submitted to the Makasar Religious Court on the grounds that the wife had a lot of debt, Islam views this divorce case as basically having no reason regarding debts and receivables, but because debts and receivables are the main reason husband and wife often experience problems. disputes and quarrels which cause there to be no longer a harmonious relationship and cannot be maintained, with that Islam views that this is a case of shiqaq (a sharp and continuous dispute between husband and wife) regarding responsibility for debts at the time of divorce, then debts arising from wrongdoing. one husband or wife cannot be transferred to that party without the knowledge or consent of the other party. In the absence of prior agreement from both parties, personal debts cannot be settled with the couple's personal assets or joint assets. So, in a situation like this, the party concerned will bear responsibility for the loan.
References
Abdullah, A, and N Aisyah. “Fenomena Faktor Dominan Tingginya Perceraian Di Kabupaten Maros.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasisawa Perbandingan Mazhab 4, no. 3 (2023): 1021–36. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v4i3.33183.
Abdurrahman. Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademi Pressindo, 2007.
Akmal, Andi Muhammad, and Mulham Jaki Asti. “Problematika Nikah Siri, Nikah Online Dan Talak Siri Serta Implikasi Hukumnya Dalam Fikih Nikah.” Al-Risalah: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 21, no. 1 (2021): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v1i1.22247.
Al-Farran, Syekh Ahmad bin Musthafa. Tafsir Imam Syafi’i. Jakarta: Almahira, 2008.
Annizha, Andi Fitri, and Muhammad Sabir. “Dasar Penetapan Hakim Dalam Menentukan Kadar Nafkah Mut’ah (Studi Kasus Cerai Talak Istri Sebagai Wanita Karir Dan Istri Sebagai IRT Di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Klas 1A).” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v1i1.12421.
Asriani, Asriani, and Abdul Wahid Haddade. “Kedudukan Taklik Talak Dalam Pernikahan Perspektif Mazhab Zahiri Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 2 (2021): 333–39. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i2.19348.
Azizah, Nur, and Muhammad Anis. “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Melalui E-Commerce Di Gowa.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 2, no. 3 (2021): 735–42. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.22245.
Chen, Elizabeth, Muhamad Ibnu Afif, William Jason, Cancolio Frederick Sidauruk, and Salsabila Permata Anugrah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pengguna Pinjaman Online Ilegal.” Prosiding Serina 1, no. 1 (2021): 2045–52. https://doi.org/10.24912/pserina.v1i1.18080.
Darmiyanto, Darmiyanto, and Azman Arsyad. “Konsep Belis Dalam Tradisi Perkawinan Masyarakat Di Manggarai Timur; Perspektif Perbandingan Mazhab Hanafi Dan Al-Syafi’i.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 2 (2021): 421–28. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i2.19180.
Fajriyanti, Nurul. “Terlilit Hutang Sebagai Alasan Perceraian (Studi Putusan Nomor 187/Pdt. G/2019/Pa. Prg).” IAIN Parepare, 2022. https://repository.iainpare.ac.id/id/eprint/4245/.
Ghozali, Abdul Rahman. Fiqh Munakahat. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.
Haroen, Nasrun. Fiqh Muamalah. Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama, 2019.
Hikmawati, Nur, and Abdi Wijaya. “Sanksi Terhadap Pembatalan Rencana Pernikahan Akibat Perjodohan Menurut Hukum Adat Dan Islam (Studi Kasus Di Desa Ma’minasa Kecamatan Pasimasunggu Kabupaten Kepulauan Selayar).” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab 1, no. 3 (2016): 243–60. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v1i3.14905.
Idrus, Achmad Musyahid. “Diskursus Maslahat Mursalah Di Era Milenial; Tinjauan Filosofis Terhadap Konsep Maslahat Imam Malik.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 1, no. 2 (December 2019): 134–45. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V1I2.10625.
Iqrahayu, and M Thahir Maloko. “Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Kota Makassar: Studi Analisis Undang-Undang Perkawinan Dan Hukum Islam.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab 4, no. 3 (2023): 925–38. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v4i3.32877.
Kementerian Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Terjemah Dan Tajwid Berwarna. bandung: forum corrdoba, 2020.
Kementrian Agama RI. Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Perkawinan. bandung: fokusmedia, 2018.
Kutluturk, Cemil. “Princess Durrusehvar Sultan’s Selfless Struggle for Uplifting the Social Status of Hyderabadi Women.” Cogent Social Sciences 9, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2185282.
Nasution, Azhar. “Hutang Sebagai Alasan Perceraian” (Analisis Yurisprudensi No: 2429/Pdt.G/2012/PA TGRS Di Pengadilan Agama Tigaratsa).” Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2014.
Nur Isnaini, Latifah, and Fadli Andi Natsif. “Analisis Perbandingan Hukum Terhadap Putusan Nomor 13/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Mrs Tentang Gugatan Harta Bersama Di Pengadilan Agama Maros.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab 3, no. 1 (2020): 491–507. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v1i3.15453.
Of, Determination, Ujrah On, and Syariah Medan. “AL RISALAH: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum” 23, no. 2 (2023): 220–35.
Prasanti, Indah. “Kedudukan Utang Piutang Dalam Perkawinan Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Atas Harta Bersama Dalam Hal Putusnya Perkawinan Karena Perceraian.” Universitas Jember, 2013. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/10122.
Qayyum, Abdul Rahman, and Rini Ekasari. “Pemahaman Masyarakat Terhadap Kedudukan Sunrang Di Kecamatan Pallangga Kab.Gowa (Studi Perbandingan Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Islam).” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 1 (2020): 128. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i1.14294.
Quraish Shihab. Tafsir Al-Mishbah. Analytical Biochemistry. Vol. 11, 2002.
R. subekti. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Edited by tjitrosudibio. 41st ed. Jakarta Pradnya Paramita, 2013.
Ramadana, Fitri, and Abdul Halim Talli. “Kedudukan Anak Dalam Kandungan Dari Perkawinan Yang Dibatalkan Akibat Tidak Ada Izin Poligami Perspektif Imam Syafi’i Dan Imam Hanafi.” Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum 1, no. 1 (2021): 265–79. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v2i1.15437.
Saf, Mhd. Abduh, and Fadli Andi Natsif. “Persoalan HAM Dan Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Yasini 3, no. 1 (2019): 34–48.
Sayid Sabiq. Fiqih Sunnah. Sukoharjo: Insan Kamil, 2016.
Shihab, Quraish. Tafsir Al-Misbah. 2nd ed. Bandung: Mizan, 2010.
Supramono, Gatot. Perjanjian Utang Piutang. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.
Syaikh Ahmad Musthafa al-Farran. Tafsir Imam Syafi’i. Edited by Tim Almahira. jakarta: Almahira, 2008.
Syarifuddin, Amir. Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia: Antara Fiqh Munakahat Dan Undang-Undang Perkawinaan. Edited by Iskandar. 1st ed. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muh. Mudassir, Azman Arsyad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
