Legal Protection for Parties related to Forgery Committed by Notary Office Employees in Making Authentic Deed

Authors

  • Enden Suminar Universitas Jayabaya
  • Wira Franciska Universitas Jayabaya
  • Taqiyuddin Kadir Universitas Jayabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v5i2.49719

Keywords:

Perlindungan Hukum, Pemalsuan Akta, Notaris

Abstract

The phenomenon that occurs is that there are many cases of forgery committed by employees of the Notary office in making authentic deeds that are not in accordance with the procedures in making authentic deeds. Based on this background, there is a formulation of the problem, namely, what are the legal consequences of authentic deeds related to the making of deeds forged by employees of the Notary office? and how is the legal protection for the parties related to the deed forged by the Notary office employee? The theories used are the Theory of Legal Consequences according to Soeroso and the Theory of Legal Protection according to Satjipto Rahardjo. The method used in this study is a type of normative juridical research, namely literature law research or secondary data with primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The research approach used is the legal and regulatory approach, the case approach, the analytical approach and the conceptual approach and the technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by identifying and inventorying positive legal rules, literature, books, journals and other sources of legal materials. For legal material analysis techniques, grammatical legal interpretation and systematic legal interpretation are carried out. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the legal consequences of authentic deeds that contain elements of forgery and in making them violate the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations, then the authentic deed can be submitted for cancellation because it is an action that contains procedural defects, namely the incompetence of the Notary and/or as PPAT to make authentic deeds while legal protection for the parties due to the occurrence of forgery committed by Notary employees, namely the parties can report Notary employees to seek criminal liability Notary employees and Notary civil liability.

References

Mukti Fajar. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Empiris & Normatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Adjie, Habib. Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.

Adjie, Sjaifurrachman dan Habib. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.

Astuti, Rahayu Kusuma. “Pemberhentian PPAT yang Dinyatakan Pailit Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2016.” JATISWARA 32, no. 3 (2017): 590–601. https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v32i3.142.

Budiono, Herlien. Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Gayo, Ahyar Ari. Notaris (Perspektif Pengawasan, Pendidikan dan Perbuatan Pidana). Jakarta: Balitbangkumham Press, 2020.

Gunadi, Ismu. Cepat Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2011.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian atas Proposionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersil. Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Hosein, Siti Hajati. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Sebagai Pemberi Kerja Dalam Hal Terjadi Perbuatan Melawan Hukum.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 49, no. 3 (2019): 2019.

Latumenten, Pieter E. Cacat Yuridis Akta Notaris Dalam Peristiwa Hukum Konkrit dan Implikasi Hukumnya. Jakarta: Tuma Press, 2011.

Lestari, Tri Wahyu Surya. “Komparasi Syarat Keabsahan ‘Sebab Yang Halal’ Dalam Perjanjian Konvensional Dan Perjanjian Syariah.” Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam Yudisia 08, no. 02 (2017): 287.

Lutifa, (et.al). “Tanggjung Jawab Notaris Atas Pelanggaran Terhadap Penandatanganan Akta yang Tidak Dilakukan Dihadapan Notaris.” Tanjungpura Acta Borneo Journal 1, no. 1 (2022): 45.

Mamudji, Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Mas, Marwan. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2003.

Moleong, Lexy J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, 2008.

Nonet, Philippe. Menuju Hukum yang Responsif. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2019.

Notodisoerjo, R.soegondo. Hukum Notariat di Indonesia suatu penjelasan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1993.

Pandoman, Agus. Teori & Praktek Akta Perikatan Publisitas & Non Publisitas. Jakarta: PT. Raja Utama Kreasi, 2017.

Pound, Roscoe. Introduction to The Philosophy of Law, Terjemahan Muhammad Rajab, Pengantar Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Bharata, 1996.

Purnayasa, Agus Toni. “Akibat Hukum Terdegradasinya Akta Notaris yang Tidak Memenuhi Syarat Pembuatan Akta Autentik.” Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 3 (2018): 395–409. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ActaComitas.

Putri A.R. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris. 2 ed. Jakarta: PT. Sofmedia, 2020.

Rifiani, Hartanti Sulihandari & Nisya. Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Notaris. Jakarta: Dunia Cerdas, 2013.

Simanjuntak, P.N.H. Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan, 2007.

Soekanto, Soejono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press, 2006.

Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 2009.

Syaifuddin, Muhammad. Hukum Kontrak, Memahami Kontrak Dalam Persfektif Filsafat Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2012.

Velentina, Rouli Anita. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum PPAT Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Dilakukan Pegawainya.” Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan 6, no. 2 (2022): 722.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Suminar, E., Franciska, W., & Kadir, T. (2024). Legal Protection for Parties related to Forgery Committed by Notary Office Employees in Making Authentic Deed. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 5(2), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v5i2.49719

Issue

Section

Artikel