Governor Regulation Number 2 Of 2025 and the State Civil Apparatus' Polygamy Policy

A Comparative Study of Positive Law and Islamic Law

Authors

  • Muhammad Safaat Gunawan Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
  • Nurul Mujahidah Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v6i2.55532

Keywords:

Governor Regulation No. 2 of 2025, Polygamy Policy, State Civil Apparatus, Positive Law, Islamic Law

Abstract

Governor Regulation Number 2 of 2025 regulates the procedures for granting marriage and divorce permits for the State Civil Apparatus in the Special Capital Region of Jakarta, including policies regarding polygamy. In Indonesian positive law, polygamy is permitted with strict requirements, such as the consent of the first wife, urgent reasons, and permission from authorized officials. On the other hand, in Islamic law, polygamy is permitted with a maximum limit of four wives, with the main provision being justice in material and emotional aspects. This study aims to compare the regulation of polygamy in Governor Regulation Number 2 of 2025 with the principles of Islamic law and examine its impact on the State Civil Apparatus and their families. Using a juridical-normative research method and a theological approach, this study referred to positive legal sources such as the Marriage Law and Government Regulations, as well as the arguments in Islamic law that regulated polygamy. The results of the study showed that although positive law and Islamic law both recognize polygamy, there were significant differences in their requirements and implementation. Positive law emphasized strict administrative control to prevent abuse, while Islamic law provided space with conditions of justice that are difficult to fulfill absolutely. Presenting this Governor Regulation as a real effort by the government to control the practice of polygamy in the State Civil Apparatus environment in the Special Capital Region of Jakarta, in order to maintain family stability and the professionalism of civil servants.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Safaat Gunawan, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia

Assistant Professor, Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, University of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia

Nurul Mujahidah, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, Indonesia

Doctoral Student, Department of Dirasah Islamiyah, Concentration Sharia/Islamic Law, Postgraduate Alauddin State Islamic University Makassar, Indonesia

References

AD, Mhd Irfan, and Afdhalia Mahatta. “Konsep Keadilan Dalam Poligami (Telaah QS An-Nisa Ayat 3).” Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 9, no. 1 (2024): 53–60. https://journals.fasya.uinib.org/index.php/sakena/article/view/582.

Aini, Supiatul, and Abdurrahman Abdurrahman. “Rasionalitas Perintah Ayat Poligami: Kajian Pemikiran Tafsir Muhammad Abduh.” Al-Irfani: Journal of Al Qur’anic and Tafsir 2, no. 2 (2021): 24–45. https://doi.org/10.51700/irfani.v2i2.313.

Andi Airiza Rezki Syafa’at, Aisyah Kara, Asni, Kurniati, and Indo Santalia. “Konsep Poligami Menurut Pandangan Perempuan PNS Di Kota Makassar Terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah No. 45 Tahun 1990 Pasal 4 Ayat (2) Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syari’ah.” Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam 5, no. 2 (2024): 175–202. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v5i2.361.

Aqil, Izan Syarifurrohman. “Pengetatan Poligami Di Indonesia Perspektif Maqashid Syariah Dan Hukum Positif.” MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law 4, no. 2 (2023): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24256/maddika.v4i2.3994.

Arbie, Alfian, and Milhan Milhan. “Analisis Terhadap Pengabulan Izin Poligami Dengan Alasan Telah Menghamili Calon Istri Kedua (Telaah Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt. G/2019/PA. Rtg).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 3443–51. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1138.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-23

How to Cite

Gunawan, M. S., & Mujahidah, N. (2025). Governor Regulation Number 2 Of 2025 and the State Civil Apparatus’ Polygamy Policy: A Comparative Study of Positive Law and Islamic Law. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 6(2), 270–285. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v6i2.55532

Issue

Section

Artikel