Marriage Dispensation and Child Protection in Indonesia

Harmonizing the Sexual Violence Crimes Law with KUA Marriage Registration

Authors

  • Ririn Aprinda STAI Al-Gazali Soppeng, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Alwi Nasir KUA Kecamatan Marioriwawo, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Yadri Abrar Al-Azhar University, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v6i3.73517

Keywords:

Marriage Dispensation, Child Protection, Sexual Violence Crimes Law, Office of Religious Affairs (KUA), Legal Harmonization

Abstract

The regulation of marriage dispensation within the Indonesian legal system continues to present implementation challenges, particularly following the enactment of the Minister of Religious Affairs Regulation Number 30 of 2024 concerning Marriage Registration and Law Number 12 of 2022 on the Crime of Sexual Violence. Law Number 16 of 2019 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019 continue to provide legal grounds for granting marriage dispensations through court decisions, whereas Law Number 12 of 2022 prioritizes child protection by prohibiting forced marriage and practices related to child marriage. These differing regulatory orientations place the Office of Religious Affairs (Kantor Urusan Agama KUA) in a dilemma, as it is legally obligated to register marriages based on court-issued dispensation decisions while simultaneously supporting the national policy on child protection. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing marriage dispensation, examine the normative disharmony between the Minister of Religious Affairs Regulation Number 30 of 2024 and Law Number 12 of 2022, and formulate a regulatory harmonization model capable of ensuring legal certainty for the KUA while strengthening child protection. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and legal synchronization approaches. The data were collected through library research and analyzed qualitatively by applying the principles of lex superior derogat legi inferiori, lex specialis derogat legi generali, and legal harmonization. The findings reveal that the issue does not arise from a direct conflict of legal norms but rather from differing policy orientations that create uncertainty in implementation. The KUA is only authorized to register marriages based on court-issued marriage dispensation decisions. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is required through legislative synchronization, standardized criteria for granting marriage dispensations, strengthened inter-agency coordination, and the optimization of the KUA's preventive role to ensure legal certainty and enhance child protection.

References

Alwi, Bashori, dan Hudaifa Muslihatul Ummah. “Urgensi Aspek Psikologis pada Pemeriksaan Dispensasi Kawin Perspektif Maqasid Al-Syariah.” AL-SULTHANIYAH 14, no. 1 (2025): 176–89. https://doi.org/10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v14i1.3695.

Arif, Nurhilal Nazri, Johari, dan Jumni Nelli. “Problematika Hukum Formil terhadap Ketentuan PERMA Nomor 05 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengajuan Dispensasi Kawin Perspektif Maslahah Mursalah.” YUSTISI 11, no. 2 (2024): 137–48. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v11i2.16670.

Asman, Asman. “Masa Depan Terancam: Dispensasi Perkawinan dan Dampak Negatif pada Anak dan Keluarga.” Journal of Dual Legal Systems 1, no. 2 (2024): 73–86. https://doi.org/10.58824/jdls.v1i2.223.

Ela, Ela, Zuhrah Zuhrah, dan Juhriati. “Kedudukan Dispensasi Kawin dan Dampaknya terhadap Peningkatan Perkawinan di Bawah Umur.” NALAR: Journal of Law and Sharia 2, no. 3 (2024): 213–24. https://doi.org/10.61461/nlr.v2i3.112.

Fadhli, Ashabul, Asasriwarni Asasriwarni, Elfia Elfia, dan Muhammad Hizbi Islami. “Out-of-Court Assistance Based on the Principle of the Best Interests of the Child: Study on Examination Process of Marriage Dispensation Cases.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 23, no. 1 (2024): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v23i1.10281.

Fajarwati, Nada, Wagiyem Wagiyem, dan Nur Hakimah. “Implikasi Asas Lex Specialis pada Penetapan Usia Nikah dan Dispensasinya di Indonesia.” Khatulistiwa Law Review 5, no. 1 (2024): 14–24. https://doi.org/10.24260/klr.v5i1.5115.

Fatimah, Sitti. “Harmonisasi Nilai-Nilai Maqasid al-Syariah dan Hukum Nasional dalam Penetapan Usia Minimum Perkawinan di Indonesia.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 6 (2025): 11636–47. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.4453.

Fattah, Muhammad Akmal, dan Fitria Agustin. “Tinjauan Yuridis Perkawinan di Bawah Umur di Kalangan Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perkawinan.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan 16, no. 7 (2026): 431–40. https://doi.org/10.6679/0y3g8v62.

Fero, Muhamad Jidan, Siti Nur Fatoni, dan Ahmad Maula Hadi. “Responsibilitas Penghulu terhadap Putusan Dispensasi Kawin di KUA Sindangkerta Bandung Barat.” QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies 4, no. 4 (2026): 2148–59. https://doi.org/10.58738/qanun.v4i4.1427.

Hasan, Fahadil Amin Al, dan Deni Kamaluddin Yusup. “Dispensasi Kawin dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Menjamin Kepentingan Terbaik Anak melalui Putusan Hakim.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 14, no. 1 (2021): 86–98. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2021.14107.

Hidayat, Arif, Wakid Evendi, dan Nelud Darajaatul Aliyah. “Dispensasi Kawin dengan Alasan Sangat Mendesak di Mojokerto: Analisis Yuridis atas PERMA No. 5 Tahun 2019.” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam 16, no. 2 (2024): 483–98. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v16i2.9416.

Ilyas, Afrizal, dan Roykhatun Nikmah. “Efektivitas Pengumuman Kehendak Nikah dalam PMA Nomor 30 Tahun 2024 pada KUA di Kabupaten Boyolali.” Esensi Hukum 7, no. 1 (2025): 72–86. https://doi.org/10.35586/esensihukum.v7i1.480.

Indriani, Dice, Utari Maharany Barus, dan Yati Sharfina Desiandri. “Akibat Hukum Penetapan Hakim dalam Perkara Dispensasi Kawin pada Pasangan Muda yang Hamil di Luar Kawin.” Al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH) 6, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.20885/mawarid.vol.6.iss1.art6.

Makkajareng, La Ode Ismail. “Analisis Yuridis Penerapan Dispensasi Nikah terhadap Perkawinan di Bawah Umur di Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA) Kecamatan Ngapa Kabupaten Kolaka Utara.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 2, no. 1 (2024): 143–53.

Maulana, Alfan, Titi Atiyatul Alawiyah, dan Firman Adi Candra. “Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Menjawab Tantangan Dinamika Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Interdisipliner 9, no. 11 (2025). https://sejurnal.com/pub/index.php/jpii/article/view/2149.

Munawarah, Tuti. “Consistency of the Implementation of PERMA Number 5 of 2019 in the Marriage Dispensation Decision: A Child Protection Perspective.” Al-Rasikh: Jurnal Hukum Islam 15, no. 1 (2026): 87–104. https://doi.org/10.38073/rasikh.4575.

Nayoan, Sandi, Hasiah, dan Yuniartik. “Implementasi Peraturan Menteri Agama Nomor 30 Tahun 2024 tentang Pencatatan Pernikahan di Kantor Urusan Agama (KUA): Studi Kasus di KUA Kec. Tebas Kab. Sambas.” Cross-Border 8, no. 2 (2025): 87–90.

Nurhady, Muhammad Darish Alfi Putra, Muhammad Sahriadi Lubis, M. Yazid Al Hikam Batu Bara, Najla Mutia Thaher, Revani Iswanda, dan Syafa Tria Putri. “Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa 4, no. 4 (2026): 498–506. https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v4i4.2722.

Paijar, Pijri. “Kewenangan Pegawai Pencatat Nikah di Kantor Urusan Agama dalam Menolak Kehendak Nikah: Studi Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan Rancabali.” Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam 5, no. 2 (2024): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v5i2.31070.

Putri, Syafa Tria, dan M. Yazid Alhikam B. Bara. “Penyalahgunaan Wewenang oleh Pejabat dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara.” Jurnal Kebijakan Reformasi Hukum 10, no. 1 (2026). https://ojs.ubesco.com/index.php/jkrh/article/view/1326.

Rahmaniar, A., Irfan Amir, Ismail Keri, Ilmiyati Ilmiyati, Asni Zubair, dan Rosita Rosita. “Analisis Yuridis Empiris Pencatatan Nikah Siri Pasangan di Bawah Umur.” Constitutional Law Review, 30 Oktober 2022, 78–91. https://doi.org/10.30863/clr.v1i2.3995.

Ramelan, Rafida, dan Rahmi Nurtsani. “Disfungsi Dispensasi Kawin dalam Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak di Indonesia.” Usroh: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 8, no. 1 (2024): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.19109/ujhki.v8i1.23274.

Rmadhan, Ilham Aji, Ardiansyah Fuad Hilmy, Indah Suciati, Farensa Yudha Tamara, Alya Mukhbita Lubna Aulya, dan Santoso Budi Nurs-Al Umar. “Dispensasi Nikah dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam: Analisis terhadap Perlindungan Hak Anak di Indonesia.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 3 (2026): 5454–62. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i3.6234.

Rohman, Miftakur. “Dispensasi Perkawinan dan Kebijakan Politik Hukum di Indonesia.” MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2023): 556–71. https://doi.org/10.33754/masadir.v3i01.677.

Saipul, Galuh. “Peran Penghulu terhadap Pencatatan Perkawinan.” ATTAQWA: Jurnal Hukum Islam 1, no. 1 (2024): 30–38.

Salamah, Fitriati, Indra Rahmatullah, dan Nadia Hilali Zahra. “Implementasi PERMA No. 5 Tahun 2019 dalam Meminimalisir Perkawinan Anak: Studi di Pengadilan Agama Garut.” Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Administrasi Keperdataan Islam 1, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15408/jhk-aki.v1i1.31180.

Sulistyarini. “Penguatan Norma Syarat Dispensasi Kawin dalam Upaya Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak Berdasarkan Perspektif Teori Tujuan Hukum.” Justitia et Pax 39, no. 1 (2023): 55–85. https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v39i1.6580.

Wiraguna, Sidi. “Eksplorasi Metode Penelitian dengan Pendekatan Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum di Indonesia.” Lex Jurnalica 22, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.47007/lj.v22i1.8801.

Yanova, Muhammad Hendri, Parman Komarudin, dan Hendra Hadi. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Analisis Problematika Hukum dengan Metode Penelitian Normatif dan Empiris.” Badamai Law Journal 8, no. 2 (2023): 394–408. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v8i2.17423.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Aprinda, R., Nasir, M. A., & Abrar, M. Y. (2025). Marriage Dispensation and Child Protection in Indonesia: Harmonizing the Sexual Violence Crimes Law with KUA Marriage Registration. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v6i3.73517