Peer Review Process


Authors should present their manuscript honestly without fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, or inappropriate data manipulation. Submitted manuscript is evaluated by anonymous referees for contribution, originality, relevance, and presentation by the editor-in-chief as well as associate editors. Besides, the articles will be evaluated on the suitability of aim and scope, language, writing grammar, template, and similarity. The editors will inform the authors about the eligibility of publishing the article.

Every submitted manuscript is independently reviewed by at least two peer reviewers. This journal operates a conventional double-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewers’ name is always concealed from the submitting author. Manuscript will be sent for anonymous review by at least two reviewers who will either be members of the Editorial Board and Reviewers or other similar positions in the field. To shorten the review process and respond quickly to the authors, the editors may triage a submission and decide without sending the manuscript for external review. The editors’ decision is final and no correspondence can be entered into manuscript considered unsuitable for publication in this journal. All correspondence, including notification of the editors’ decision and requests for revisions, will be sent by email.