CHINA’S DUAL CIRCULATION STRATEGY AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF CHINA–GERMANY MANUFACTURING RELATIONS

Authors

  • Ernawati Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Aspin Nur Arifin Rivai Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Keywords:

Dual Circulation Strategy, State Capitalism, German Manufacturing, Strategic Interdependence, De-risking

Abstract

This article examines how China's Dual Circulation Strategy reshapes China–Germany economic cooperation in the manufacturing sector. Using a qualitative case study of bilateral manufacturing relations after 2020, it analyses how China's state-capitalist industrial strategy affects German manufacturing through changes in trade patterns, investment localization, industrial competition, supply-chain dependence, and state-business relations. The article argues that Dual Circulation should not be read as economic isolation or direct decoupling. It is better understood as a state-led effort to strengthen domestic demand, technological self-reliance, and industrial capacity while preserving external circulation where it supports China's upgrading. For German manufacturers, Dual Circulation produces a more selective and contested form of interdependence. China remains an important market, production base, and supply-chain node, while also becoming a stronger competitor in automobiles, batteries, machinery, chemicals, and advanced industrial technologies.

References

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Bundesbank. (2024). Risks facing Germany as a result of its economic ties with China. Monthly Report, January 2024. https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/920354/f55ae8e38e3bb5c4cb8c5e0f426552cd/mL/2024-01-china-data.pdf

Destatis. (2026). China is Germany's most important trading partner once again in 2025. Federal Statistical Office of Germany. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2026/02/PE26_056_51.html

European Commission. (2023). Speech by President von der Leyen on EU-China relations to the Mercator Institute for China Studies and the European Policy Centre. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_23_2333

Evans, P. (1995). Embedded autonomy. States and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press.

Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence. How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351

Federal Foreign Office. (2023). Strategy on China of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany. https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/resource/blob/2608580/49d50fecc479304c3da2e2079c55e106/china-strategie-en-data.pdf

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.

German Chamber of Commerce in China. (2024). Localization 3.0. German companies deepen localization in China to stay competitive in a challenging market. https://china.ahk.de/en/news/localization-3.0-german-companies-deepen-localization-in-china-to-stay-competitive-in-a-challenging-market

International Monetary Fund. (2026). World Economic Outlook database. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence. World politics in transition. Little, Brown.

Kratz, A., Goh, D., Williams, G., & Barkin, N. (2024). Don't stop believin'. The inexorable rise of German FDI in China. Rhodium Group. https://rhg.com/research/dont-stop-believin-the-inexorable-rise-of-german-fdi-in-china/

Kratz, A., Zenglein, M. J., Mischer, A., Williams, G., & Meyer, A. (2025). Chinese investment rebounds despite growing frictions. Chinese FDI in Europe in 2024. MERICS and Rhodium Group. https://merics.org/en/report/chinese-investment-rebounds-despite-growing-frictions-chinese-fdi-europe-2024-update

Lardy, N. R. (2019). The state strikes back. The end of economic reform in China? Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Lin, J. Y. (2021). Dual circulation and the new development pattern. China Economic Journal.

McNally, C. A. (2012). Sino-capitalism. China's reemergence and the international political economy. World Politics, 64(4), 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887112000202

Milhaupt, C. J., & Zheng, W. (2015). Beyond ownership. State capitalism and the Chinese firm. Georgetown Law Journal, 103(3), 665–722.

Musacchio, A., & Lazzarini, S. G. (2014). Reinventing state capitalism. Leviathan in business, Brazil and beyond. Harvard University Press.

National Development and Reform Commission. (2021). Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives for 2035. People's Republic of China.

Naughton, B. (2021). The rise of China's industrial policy, 1978 to 2020. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Pearson, M. M., Rithmire, M., & Tsai, K. S. (2021). Party-state capitalism in China. Current History, 120(827), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2021.120.827.207

Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. Pinter.

Su, L., & Liang, J. (2021). Understanding China's new dual circulation development strategy. A Marxian input-output analysis. Review of Radical Political Economics, 53(4), 590–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134211021971

Ten Brink, T. (2019). China's capitalism. A paradoxical route to economic prosperity. University of Pennsylvania Press.

World Bank. (2025). GDP growth, annual percent, China. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG?locations=CN

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28

How to Cite

Ernawati, & Arifin Rivai, A. N. (2026). CHINA’S DUAL CIRCULATION STRATEGY AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF CHINA–GERMANY MANUFACTURING RELATIONS. CONVERGENCE: JOURNAL OF GLOBAL DYNAMICS, 2(1), 1–18. Retrieved from https://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/ConGlobe/article/view/67368