Transformation of Physics Curriculum in Indonesia: A Study from KTSP to Merdeka Curriculum

Authors

  • Andi Ulfah Khuzaimah Universitas Tadulako
  • Mukti Ali Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Nurul Kami Sani Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v13i1.57597

Keywords:

Transformasi Kurikulum , Fisika SMA , KTSP , Kurikulum 2013 , Kurikulum Merdeka , SLR , Pendidikan Indonesia

Abstract

The transformation of Indonesia's curriculum reflects the dynamics of social change, advancements in science and technology, and the evolving demands of globalization. This study aims to examine the development of the physics curriculum at the senior high school (SMA) level, starting from the School-Based Curriculum (KTSP), the 2013 Curriculum (K13), the Revised 2013 Curriculum, to the Merdeka Curriculum. The research employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach by analyzing various relevant academic sources. The review focuses on four key components of curriculum development: learning objectives, learning materials, teaching methods, and assessment strategies. The findings indicate that the Merdeka Curriculum offers the highest level of flexibility, with a more contextual, student-centered learning approach emphasizing project-based activities and self-reflection. In contrast, KTSP is characterized by a more rigid structure with limited room for innovation. The 2013 Curriculum and its revision fall between the two, maintaining a scientific approach and authentic assessment that remain relevant but are less flexible. This study recommends intensive teacher training and the broader implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum to make physics education more effective, adaptive, and meaningful.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] S. Nursabaha, H. Juhannis, St. Syamsudduha, dan S. Mania, “The Impact of Life Skill Education Curriculum Implementation In Anticipating Adolescent Problems At The Unicef Project Pilot School in Bone Regency,” Lentera Pendidik. J. Ilmu Tarb. Dan Kegur., vol. 25, no. 1, hlm. 126–137, Jun 2022, doi: 10.24252/lp.2022v25n1i11.

[2] Lismina, Pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi. Ponorogo: Tim Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia, 2019.

[3] F. Wahyuni, “Kurikulum dari Masa ke Masa (Telaah atas Pentahapan Kurikulum Pendidikan di Indonesia),” Al-Adab., vol. 10, no. 2, 2015.

[4] F. D. Insani, “Sejarah Perkembangan Kurikulum Di Indonesia Sejak Awal Kemerdekaan Hingga Saat Ini,” -Salam J. Studi Huk. Islam Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 1, hlm. 43–64, Jun 2019, doi: 10.51226/assalam.v8i1.132.

[5] A. Achruh, “Komponen dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum,” 2019.

[6] M. Suluh dan J. Jumadi, “Persepsi Guru dan Peserta Didik terhadap Proses Pembelajaran Fisika Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013,” J. Penelit. Dan Pengkaj. Ilmu Pendidik. ESaintika, vol. 2, no. 2, hlm. 62, 2019, doi: 10.36312/esaintika.v2i2.10.

[7] U. Zamili, “Peranan Guru dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum,” Pionir LPPM Univ. Asahan, vol. 6, no. 2, hlm. 311–318, 2020.

[8] A. Efferi, “Respon Guru Dalam Menyikapi Perubahan Kurikulum (Studi Kasus Pada Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Kudus),” vol. 5, no. 1, 2017.

[9] D. Herawati, S. S. Latifah, dan R. R. Munandar, “Persepsi Guru terhadap Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Biologi,” Pedagonal J. Ilm. Pendidik., vol. 2, no. 2, hlm. 01–06, Sep 2018, doi: 10.33751/pedagog.v2i2.847.

[10] A. Munandar, Pengantar Kurikulum. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama, 2012.

[11] Mi. Abdullah, “Fisika DasarI,” Kampus Ganesa, 2016.

[12] Z. F. Putri dan N. Maula, “Studi Literatur: Transformasi Kurikulum Indonesia 1947 Sampai Kurikulum Merdeka Dilihat dari Perspektif Model Kurikulum,” vol. 28, 2024.

[13] K. Amaliah, A. Kurniawan, dan A. U. Sholikahah, “Penggunaan E-Modul Berbasis Etnosains Pada Sekolah Menengah Atas Mata Pelajaran Fisika: Studi Literature,” vol. 4, 2022.

[14] D. Febriyenti, N. Putri, A. Asmendri, dan M. Sari, “Perkembangan Kurikulum di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Sejarah,” Al-Idaroh J. Studi Manaj. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 7, no. 2, hlm. 195–214, Sep 2023, doi: 10.54437/alidaroh.v7i2.932.

[15] Azhar, “Perkembangan Kurikulum di Indonesia dari Klasik Ke Modern,” FITRAH Int. Islam. Educ. J., vol. 2, no. 2, hlm. 104–124, Des 2020, doi: 10.22373/fitrah.v2i2.784.

[16] R. Farwati, T. Yulianova, M. Anggraini, dan S. Marfu’ah, “Perspektif Guru Kimia, Fisika, dan Biologi Terhadap Perubahan Kurikulum”.

[17] F. Wahyuni, “Kurikulum Dari Masa Ke Masa (Telaah Atas Pentahapan Kurikulum Pendidikan di Indonesia)”.

[18] Soly Deo Glorya Hutagalung dan Ely Kurniati, “Analisis Perubahan Kurikulum terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Sman 3 Kota Jambi (Studi Perubahan Kurikulum 2013 Ke Kurikulum Merdeka),” Sci. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, hlm. 1–8, Apr 2024, doi: 10.62872/de6xve94.

Published

10-06-2025

How to Cite

Khuzaimah, A. U., Ali, M., & Kami Sani, N. (2025). Transformation of Physics Curriculum in Indonesia: A Study from KTSP to Merdeka Curriculum. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar, 13(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v13i1.57597

Issue

Section

Articles