KAPITALISME PLATFORM DAN PENOPTIKON DIGITAL: ETNOGRAFI ATAS PENGALAMAN PENGEMUDI PEREMPUAN RIDE-HAILING DI MAKASSAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/sosioreligius.v10i2.64101Keywords:
Platform capitalism, algorithmic management, women drivers, feminist ethnography, gendered laborAbstract
This study is grounded in the everyday lives of women drivers working for Gojek and Grab in Makassar, Indonesia, and seeks to understand how platform capitalism is lived, felt, and negotiated in daily work practices. Focusing on algorithmic management and partnership status, the study examines how digital power relations shape labor subjectivities, affective experiences, and gendered vulnerabilities within the urban digital economy, particularly amid persistent narratives of work flexibility. Adopting a post-structuralist feminist ethnographic approach, the research draws on in-depth unstructured interviews with six women drivers alongside reflexive observation of their daily work rhythms across the city. This ethnographic lens enables close attention to stories, emotions, and everyday tactics that are often overlooked in macro-level policy or political economy analyses. The findings show that algorithms operate as a digital panopticon, governing work through rating systems, task allocation, and opaque automated sanctions, producing a continuous sense of being monitored. Partnership status is initially interpreted by drivers as a promise of autonomy, yet in practice it normalizes the transfer of economic and social risks onto individuals. For women, algorithmic control is layered with emotional labor demands, customer rating biases, and heightened risks in public space. Work flexibility is experienced as illusory, as decisions made for family care or personal safety frequently result in reduced access to work. Nevertheless, women drivers develop micro-resistances through informal solidarity, algorithmic literacy, and ongoing negotiations of time and space. The study underscores that platform labor is not gender-neutral and calls for labor policy interventions grounded in women’s lived experiences.
References
BPS. (2023). Keadaan Ketenagakerjaan Indonesia Agustus 2023.
Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). After neoliberalization? Globalizations, 7(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731003669669
Budiman, A. (2020). Startup digital, ekonomi platform, dan transformasi ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 14(2), 157–174.
Cant, C. (2019). Riding for Deliveroo: Resistance in the new economy. Polity Press.
Cinnamon, J. (2017). Social injustice in surveillance capitalism. Surveillance & Society, 15(5), 609-625. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i5.6433
Duffy, B. E. (2015). Gendering the labor of social media production. Feminist Media Studies, 15(4), 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1053715
Duffy, B. E., Poell, T., & Nieborg, D. B. (2019). Platform practices in the cultural industries: Creativity, labor, and citizenship. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879672
Flyverbom, M. (2022). Overlit: digital architectures of visibility. Organization Theory, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221090314
Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuchs, C. (2024). Appropriation of digital machines and appropriation of fixed capital as the real appropriation of social being: a comment on toni negri’s article “the appropriation of fixed capital: a metaphor?”. Triplec Communication Capitalism & Critique Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 22(1), 468-475. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v22i1.1512
Gill, R. (2017). Gender and the media (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (Eds.). (2011). New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism and subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan.
Harvey, D. (2010). The right to the city: From capital surplus to accumulation by dispossession. Dalam S. Banerjee-Guha (Ed.), Accumulation by dispossession (pp. 17–32). SAGE.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (2012). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520951853
Langley, P., & Leyshon, A. (2017). Platform capitalism: The intermediation and capitalisation of digital economic circulation. Finance and Society, 3(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v3i1.1936
Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E., & Dabbish, L. (2015). Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic management on worker experience. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1603–1612). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702548
Mateescu, A., & Nguyen, A. (2019). Explainer: Algorithmic management in the workplace. Data & Society Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3376436
Moisander, J., Groß, C., & Eräranta, K. (2017). Mechanisms of biopower and neoliberal governmentality in precarious work: mobilizing the dependent self-employed as independent business owners. Human Relations, 71(3), 375-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717718918
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2007). Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 731–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507083505
Power, M. (2022). Theorizing the economy of traces: from audit society to surveillance capitalism. Organization Theory, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211052296
Ravenelle, A. J. (2019). Hustle and gig: Struggling and surviving in the sharing economy. University of California Press.
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2686227
Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
Sadowski, J. (2020). The internet of landlords: digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism. Antipode, 52(2), 562-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595
Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2016). Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work (Revised ed.). Verso Books.
Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. MIT Press.
Uysal, G. (2022). Gender, digital labor, and the myth of flexibility: Women’s experiences in platform work. Gender, Work & Organization, 29(5), 1451–1471. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12814
van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
Woodcock, J. (2020). The algorithmic panopticon at Deliveroo: Measurement, precarity, and
Woodcock, J. (2021). The limits of algorithmic management. South Atlantic Quarterly, 120(4), 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-9443266
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design. O’Reilly Media.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rivai Mana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sosioreligius uses license CC-BY-SA or equivalent license as the optimal license use for publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scientific works. To see the rules, you can look here; Indonesia or English.











