Quality Analysis of Mathematics Textbooks For Grade X 2013 Curriculum Revised Edition In 2017 Based on A Scientific Approach

  • Lisnasari Andi Mattoliang Univeritas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Aufa Billah Arsyad Univeritas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • A. Sriyanti Univeritas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
  • Munirah UIN Alauddin Makassar
    (ID)
Keywords: 2013 curriculum, Scientific Approach, Mathematics Textbook

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of the content of the mathematics textbook based on indicators in a scientific approach. This research is a descriptive study that describes or explains systematically the facts or characteristics of a particular population. The procedure in this study consisted of: (1) the preparation stage, by selecting the revised 2017 edition of the 2017 high school senior high school mathematics textbook, (2) conducting a literature study to find out how the quality of the mathematics textbook was based on a scientific approach, (3) drawing conclusions from the data obtained. has been obtained. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, the quality of the mathematics textbooks is obtained in each chapter, namely in Chapter 1 as much as 60%, Chapter II as much as 70%, Chapter III as much as 50%, Chapter IV as much as 60%. As for the total number of chapters in textbooks based on a scientific approach as much as 60%. So it can be concluded that the quality of mathematics textbooks for class X 2013 curriculum based on the scientific approach is included in the sufficient category with the implementation of indicators in the scientific approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A Agnes, P., & Omoniyi Mathew, O. (2019). Does Math-Anxiety Effect Senior School Students’ Mathematics Performance? Evidence From Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(2).

Anwar, R. (2014). Hal-hal yang mendasari penerapan Kurikulum 2013. Humaniora, 5(1), 97–106.

Djaali, H., & Muljono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan. Jakarta: Grasindo, 2(8).

Fatimah, & Sari, R. D. K. (2018). Strategi Belajar & Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Bahasa. Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(2), 108–113.

Fendos, J. (2017). Scientific Teaching and Active Learning yet to Revolutionize Education in East Asia. Asian Education Studies, 2(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.20849/aes.v2i4.210

Fuad, A., & Nugroho, K. S. (2014). Panduan praktis penelitian kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Imran Sinaga, A., Salamuddin, S., & Khairini, D. (2020). Patterns of Islamic Education Learning in Applying 2013 Curriculum in SMPN 27 Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(3), 1551–1557. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i3.1231

Irawan, P., Ferwerda, J. A., & Marschner, S. R. (2005). Perceptually Based Tone Mapping of High Dynamic Range Image Streams. Rendering Techniques, 231–242.

Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 81A Tahun 2013 tentang Implementasi Kurikulum,. Jakarta: Permendikbud.

Kriyantono, R., & Sos, S. (2014). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi. Prenada Media.

Lang, H. G. (2016). Teaching Science. Deaf Learners, 9781563683, 57–74. https://doi.org/10.2307/3959739

Lutvaidah, U. (2016). Pengaruh Metode dan Pendekatan Pembelajaran terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v5i3.653

Muh. Alwan Haris, Kusumayanti, A., Andi Dian Angriani, & Nidya Nina Ichiana. (2022). Analisis Kualitas Buku Teks Matematika Smk Kelas Xi Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Revisi Tahun 2017 Berdasarkan Pendekatan Saintifik. Al Asma : Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v4i1.29071

Mukaromah, H. (2020). Analisis Buku Teks Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Kelas VII Semester 1 Edisi Revisi 2017 Ditinjau dari Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Salatiga.

Muslich, M. (2016). Text Book Writing Dasar-Dasar Pemahaman, Penulisan, dan Pemakaian Buku Teks. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Purwanto, M. N. (2019). Prinsip-prinsip dan teknik evaluasi pengajaran.

Supriyadi. (2018). Kualitas Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia yang Digunakan di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 39–55. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/10122/pdf

Susanti, M. (2015). Konstruktivisme Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika sekolah. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Uny 2015.

Susilana, R. (2014). Pendekatan saintifik dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan kajian teori psikologi belajar. Edutech, 13(2), 183–193.

Uno, Hamzah BUno, H. B. (2014). M. pembelajaran menciptakan proses belajar mengajar yang kreatif dan efektif. (2014). Model pembelajaran menciptakan proses belajar mengajar yang kreatif dan efektif.

Published
2022-12-01
How to Cite
Lisnasari Andi Mattoliang, Aufa Billah Arsyad, A. Sriyanti, and Munirah. 2022. “Quality Analysis of Mathematics Textbooks For Grade X 2013 Curriculum Revised Edition In 2017 Based on A Scientific Approach”. Alauddin Journal of Mathematics Education 4 (2), 121-30. https://doi.org/10.24252/ajme.v4i2.32341.
Section
Vol. 4 No. 2
Abstract viewed = 82 times