A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE VIEWS OF TURAS FIQH AND NEW FIQH REGARDING JARIMAH HUDUD PENALTIES

ISLAMIC LAW AND LANGUAGE REVIEW

  • Hannani IAIN Parepare
    (ID)
Keywords: Punishment, Jarimah Hudud, salaf scholars, modern scholars

Abstract

There is a difference of opinion between salaf scholars and modern scholars regarding the implementation of hudud jarimah. Some of them try to maintain their understanding according to the text, they want the implementation of jarimah hudud to be adapted to the practices that occurred at the time of the Prophet. While others want a new interpretation regarding jarimah hudud. Therefore, in this article the researcher wants to explain the views of salaf scholars and modern scholars regarding jarimah hudud and how linguistic interpretation relates to jarimah hudud. The method used in this study is the comparative method, by comparing the opinions of salaf scholars and modern scholars regarding jarimah hudūd. This research is a library research by collecting the opinions of scholars from various books and using descriptive analysis methods. The results of this study concluded that according to salaf scholars, jarimah hudud punishment is something that is ta'abbudi in nature which does not accept qiyas and ta'lil. their language interpretation also follows the maqshadi of sahabah and scholars which includes the terms of the crime and the conditions of the offender. While modern scholars try to reinterpret the maqashid uqubah and expand the arena of hudud and its interpretation.

References

Abdillah, Junaidi, ‘Gagasan Reaktualisasi Teori Pidana Islam Dan Relevansinya Bagi Pembangunan Hukum Di Indonesia’, Ijtimaiyya: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 10.1 (2017), 63–95
al-Khathib, Al-Syarbiny, ‘Mugni Al-Muhtaj Syarh Al-Minhaj’ (Kairo: al-halaby, 1985)
As-Sarakhsi, Syamsuddin, ‘Al-Mabsuth’ (Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiah, t. th, 1989)
Audah, Abdul Qadir, ‘Al-Tasyri’al-Jinai Al-Islami: Muqaranah Bi Al-Qanun Al-Wadi’i’, Beirut: Muas-Sasah Al-Risalah, 2 (1992), 6
Awwa, Muhammad Salim, Fi Ushul Al Nidzam Al Jinaiy Al Islamiy (Dar al Ma’arif, 1979)
Eickelman, Dale F, ‘Inside the Islamic Reformation’, The Wilson Quarterly (1976-), 22.1 (1998), 80–89
Farfur, Muhammad Abdul Latif Salih al, Al Fiqh Al Jinaiy Al Muqarin Bi Al Qanun (Damaskus: Dar al Hikmah, 1994)
Hamid, Husni Abdul, Badail Al Uqubah Al Salibah Li Al Hurriyah Fi Al Syariah Al Islamiyah (Dar al Nafais li Al Nasyr wa al Tauziy, 2007)
Haq, Islamu, ‘Pengaruh Perbedaan Keterangan Saksi Jarimah Zina (Perpektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam)’, Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 5.1 (2020), 1–14
Haq, Islamul, Fiqh Jinayah (IAIN Parepare Nusantara Press, 2020)
———, ‘Kriminalitas Dalam Persfektif Akidah Dan Syariat’, Jurnal Hukum Islam IAIN Pekalongan, 18.1 (2020), 103–20
Haq, Islamul, M Ali Rusdi Bedong, and Abdul Syatar, ‘Effect Of Young Age in Murder Felony (Comparative Study Between Islamic Jurisprudence and Indonesian Law)’, Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 3.2 (2018)
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim, ‘Are the Hudud Open to Fresh Interpretation?’, ICR Journal, 1.3 (2010), 516–18
Mu’taz al Khatib, Manhajiah Al Maqashid Wa Al Wasail Fi Al Ijtihad Al Fiqhi (Jordania: Ma’had al Alamiy li al Fikr al Islamiy, 2013)
Muhammad Idris al Tha’an, Al Madkhal Al Maqashidi Wa Al Munawarah Al Maniyah (Kutub Islamiyah)
Muhammed Nur Hamden, ‘BORDER CONTROLS IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE’, Route Educational & Social Science Journal, 7.1 (2020)
Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed An, Toward an Islamic Reformation: Civil Liberties, Human Rights, and International Law (Syracuse University Press, 1996)
Nairazi, A Z, ‘RELEVANSI JARIMAH HUDUD DAN HAM INTERNASIONAL DALAM IMPLEMENTASI DI ERA MODERN’, Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan Dan Hukum Pidana Islam, 1.2 (2016), 1–20
Ogbu, Osita Nnamani, ‘Punishments in Islamic Criminal Law as Antithetical to Human Dignity: The Nigerian Experience’, International Journal of Human Rights, 9.2 (2005), 165–82
Okon, Etim E, ‘Hudud Punishments in Islamic Criminal Law’, European Scientific Journal, 10.14 (2014)
Rahman, Fazlur, ‘The Concept of Ḥadd in Islamic Law’, Islamic Studies, 4.3 (1965), 237–51
———, ‘The Impact of Modernity on İslam’, in Religious Pluralism and World Community (Brill, 1969), pp. 248–62
Samin, Sabri, Pidana Islam Dalam Politik Hukum Indonesia: Eklektisisme Dan Pandangan Non Muslim (Kholam Pub., 2008)
Sarmini, Muhammad Anas, ‘Ittijahat Takwil Uqubah Qat’u Yad Al Sariq Baina Al Fiqh Al Islami Wa Al Nadr Al Hadasti’, Kulliya Ilahiyah Jamiah Inonu, 1 (2018)
Tomuschat, Christian, ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’, United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law, United Nations, 2008, 1–4
Yaacob, Khairil Hafizi, and Nurul Badriyah Ali, ‘Clarification on Misconception of Hudud: An Analysis of The Implementation During the Time of Prophet Muhammad and Khulafa’Al-Rashidun: Penjelasan Terhadap Salah Tanggapan Mengenai Hudud: Analisis Pelaksanaan Pada Zaman Nabi Muhammad Dan Khulafa’Al-Rasyid’, Journal of Muwafaqat, 6.1 (2023), 123–37
Published
2021-11-30
How to Cite
Hannani. (2021). A COMPARISON BETWEEN THE VIEWS OF TURAS FIQH AND NEW FIQH REGARDING JARIMAH HUDUD PENALTIES: ISLAMIC LAW AND LANGUAGE REVIEW. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 21(1), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v21i1.39768
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 129 times