Talāq Kināyah in the Perspective of the Hanafi and Maliki Madhhabs: Implications for Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v25i1.56847Keywords:
Divorce, Kinayah, Hanafi, MalikiAbstract
The purpose of this study is to examine and uncover the substantive views of the Hanafi and Maliki schools of thought regarding talak kinayah, to identify the similarities and differences between these two schools, and to analyze the legal implications of talak kinayah on contemporary fiqh. This study employs a qualitative research method. It is descriptive-comparative in nature and uses library research as its type of study. The data are analyzed through the perspective of maqashid shariah to observe the implications of talak kinayah on contemporary fiqh. The study finds that both Imams acknowledge that talak kinayah can be used to pronounce divorce, but they differ in the requirement of intention (niyyah); the Hanafi school assesses the validity of talak kinayah based on context and situation, whereas the Maliki school requires a clear intention or evident signs (qarinah). In contemporary practice, this difference influences the determination of divorce legal status, for example, in cases of verbal talak or those conveyed through electronic media. This study contributes to the development of Islamic family law and serves as a foundation for adaptive legal regulations addressing non-formal divorces in the contemporary era.
References
Al-Jaziri, Abdul Rahman. Kitab Al-Fiqh ’Ala Al-Madzhaib Al-Arba’ah. Darul Kutub Al Ilmiah Beirut, 2003.
An-Nawawi, Imam. Al-Majmu’ Syarah Al-Muhadzdzab. Pustaka Azzam, 2015.
Ash Shiddieqy, Teungku Muhammad Hasbi. Hukum-Hukum Fiqh Islam. PT. Pustaka Rizki Putra, 1997.
Asmaret, Desi. “Perceraian Melalui Media Sosial (Medsos).” MENARA Ilmu XII, no. 6 (2018): 64–76.
Hadi, Bagus Kusumo, Mohammad Mukri, and Edi Susilo. “Implikasi Hukum Khulu’ Menurut Empat Madzhab Fiqh.” El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal Of Civil And Islamic Family Law 3, no. 2 (2022): 19–38.
Hanafi, Aqsol Zidan, and Khoirul Akhsan. “Hukum Penjatuhan Talak Dengan Bahasa Kiasan Dalam Perspektif Madzhab Syafi’i Dan Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Ilmu Islam 8, no. 3 (2024): 1452–1465.
Hanil, Muhammad, Erfandi. AM, and Muh. Chiyar Hijaz. “Pandangan Tokoh Masyarakat Tentang Talak Kinayah Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam (Di Kelurahan Kaluku Bodoa, Kecamatan Tallo, Kota Makassar).” JICN: Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara 2, no. 1 (2025): 352-368.
Idfi, Mezi Watdila. “Penerapan Sharih Dan Kinayah Dalam Perceraian.” Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 9, no. 2 (2024): 47–55.
Jamhuri, and Zuhra. “Konsep Talak Menurut Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyyah (Analisis Waktu Dan Jumlah Penjatuhan Talak).” Media Syari’ah 20, no. 1 (2018): 96–122.
Kamiludin, Hilman. “Penjatuhan Talak Melalui Aplikasi WhatsApp Ditinjau Dari Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” An-Nahdliyyah: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 2, no. 2 (2023): 84-104.
Khairizzaman, and Arnia. “Talak Di Luar Pengadilan Dan Implikasinya.” Jurnal Tahqiqa 16, no. 2 (2022): 44–55.
Lutfiah, and Titin Samsudin. “Lafadz Sharih Dan Kinayah Dalam Talak Dan Perceraian.” As-Syams: Journal Hukum Islam 2, no. 2 (2021): 1–21.
M. Muhsin, and Soleh Hasan Wahid. “Talak Di Luar Pengadilan Perspektif Fikih Dan Hukum Positif.” E-Journal Al-Syakhsiyyah Journal Of Law and Family Studies 3, no. 1 (2021): 67–84.
Mahanum. “Tinjauan Kepustakaan.” ALACRITY: Journal Of Education 1, no. 2 (2021):1-12.
Malinda, Rosi, Moh. Nafik, and Fatimatuz Zahro. “Perbedaan Akibat Hukum Talak Tiga Yang Jatuh Di Luar Dan Di Depan Sidang Pengadilan Perspektif Fiqih Empat Mazhab.” MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam 03, no. 02 (2023): 765–784.
Muhaki, and Husein Aziz. “Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Sebagai Instrumen Pembaharuan Fiqih Sosial Kontemporer (Telaah Terhadap Pemikiran Ibnu Ashur).” Al-Ibrah 9, no. 2 (2024): 125–152.
Nasution, Rusli Halil. “Talak Menurut Hukum Islam.” Al-Hadi 3, no. 2 (2018): 707–716.
Pradikta, Hervin Yoki, Aizzatur Rodhiyah, and Tiara Rica Dayani. “Pandangan Mazhab Imam Maliki Dan Mazhab Imam Syafi’i Tentang ’Azl Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Berketurunan.” El-Izdiwaj: Indonesian Journal Of Civil And Islamic Family Law 4, no. 1 (2023): 31–44.
R, Musdalipa, and Lukman Hakim. “Studi Komparatif Antara Mazhab Maliki Dan Mazhab Hanafi Tentang Talak Mua’allaq Dengan Kalimat Insya Allah.” Jurnal Studi Keislaman 2, no. 1 (2021): 43–60.
Rusyd, Ibnu. Bidayatul Mujtahid. Pustaka Azzam, 2007.
S, Riza Anissa Triana, and Sahruddin. “Analisis Terhadap Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Cerai (Studi Putusan Nomor 64/ Pdt.G./2013/PA.Mtr).” Jurnal Private Law Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram 3, no. 1 (February 2023): 115–121.
Setiyanto, Danu Aris. “Pemikiran Hukum Islam Imam Malik Bin Anas (Pendekatan Sejarah Sosial).” Al-Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum 1, no. 2 (2016): 104–114.
Siregar, Idris, Nur Tasya Hariany Sitorus, and Tari Nur Fajri. “Talaq Menurut Perspektif Hukum Dan Sosial Dalam Konteks Islam.” MANDUB: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (2024): 164–172.
Sopian, Achmad. “Kitab Fiqh Al-Akbar Karya Imam Abu Hanifah.” An-Nawa: Jurnal Studi Islam 3, no. 2 (2021): 77–88.
Utami, Murni, Noor Hafizah, and Nurul Izatil Hasanah. “Mazhab Hanafiah Dan Perkembangannya: Sejarah Dan Peta Pemikiran.” Journal Islamic Education 1, no. 2 (2023): 21–35.
Waruwu, Marinu. “Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method).” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 7, no. 1 (2023): 2896–2910.
Wijaya, M. Tatam. Jatuh Talak Via WA, Email, SMS, Atau Aplikasi Pesan Lainnya? 22 Juli 2019, URL: https://islam.nu.or.id/nikah-keluarga/jatuhkah-talak-via-wa-email-sms-atau-aplikasi-pesan-lainnya-taSpQ
Yusuf, Muhammad Yasin, Intania Rafi’ah Ramadhani, and Sya’roni. “Hakikat, Majas, Sharih, Kinayah.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora 2, no. 10 (2024): 804–820.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Riska Mahdiana, Alamsyah, Hervin Yoki Pradikta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
