The Limitation of KPK’s Authority over BUMN Officials
Legal, Theoretical, and Institutional Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.57959Keywords:
KPK, BUMN, Authority, Atate administrator, Administrative lawAbstract
This study explores the legal and institutional consequences of limiting the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in prosecuting corruption cases involving State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN), particularly after the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2025 and Law No. 19 of 2019. Using a normative juridical method that incorporates statutory analysis, conceptual frameworks, and relevant case studies, the research highlights a significant shift in the legal status of BUMN directors and commissioners. By no longer recognizing them as state administrators, the law effectively reduces the KPK's oversight capabilities and creates a potential legal vacuum. This shift poses a risk of enabling undetected corruption in strategic sectors of the economy and undermines public confidence in anti-corruption institutions. To bridge legal interpretation and institutional practice, this study draws from the theory of authority and institutional effectiveness. It emphasizes the need for clearer legal definitions and coherence in regulatory design. As a policy recommendation, the study calls for the revision of existing laws to restore the KPK’s functional oversight over BUMN officials and proposes a renewed interpretation of “state administrator” to align with anti-corruption objectives.
References
Abdallah, Raffi Ikzaaz, Immanuel Given Bintang A, Aulia Rachmatullah Nadjima, Alfarel Endito Putra, Sulthan Muhammad Tamir A, and Handoyo Prasetyo. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Penghapusan KPK Serta Pelimpahan Hak, Kewajiban, Dan Wewenang Aparatur Hukum.” Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) 2, no. 3 (2024): 379–85.
Burchardt, Hans-Jürgen, and Johanna Leinius. (Post-) Colonial Archipelagos: Comparing the Legacies of Spanish Colonialism in Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11747103.
Chanda, Meldiya Kismonia, and Eka Vidya Putra. “Internalisasi Budaya Organisasi (Studi Budaya Organisasi Bawaslu Sumatera Barat).” Jurnal Perspektif 4, no. 1 (February 5, 2021): 39. https://doi.org/10.24036/perspektif.v4i1.392.
Chanwichian, Jeerabhan, Nattapong Techarattanased, Bundit Pungnirund, and Tanapol Kortana. “‘TEM-NACC’ An Excellent Management Model of The National Anti-Corruption Commission of Thailand.” Rajapark Journal 19, no. 62 (2025): 1–26.
Ciptaswara, Rio Fafen, and Sulistiowati. “Implementasi Hilirisasi Mineral Dan Batu Bara Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Kedaulatan Energi Dan Daya Saing Industri Nasional.” Mimbar Hukum 34, no. 2 (December 29, 2022): 521–58. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i2.3490.
Dahoklory, Madaskolay Viktoris. “Dinamika Pengelolaan Keuangan Bumn Perihal ”Dilema” Antara Kerugian Negara Ataukah Kerugian Bisnis.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding 9, no. 3 (2020): 349–65.
Kautsar, Dhimas Mohammad, and Dini Rosdini. “Mekanisme Pengenaan Sanksi Emiten, Perusahaan Publik, Dan Profesi Penunjang Pasar Modal Sebagai Implementasi Good Corporate Govenance (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor OJK Pusat).” Jurnal IAKP 6, no. 1 (2025): 64–72.
Koenti, Ishviati Joenaini, Takaria Dinda Diana Ethika, and Rendradi Suprihandoko. “Aktualisasi Pancasila Dalam Etika Penyelenggara Negara Untuk Mewujudkan Negara Yang Bersih Bebas Korupsi, Kolusi Dan Nepotisme.” PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL PROGRAM DOKTOR ILMU HUKUM UMS, 2022, 221–33.
Lestari, Winda, Hafrida, and Tri Imam Munandar. “Perbandingan Hukum Lembaga Pemberantasan Korupsi (Kpk) Indonesia Dan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM).” Universitas Jambi, 2021.
Makruf, Makruf, and Murni Murni. “Analisis Efisiensi Dan Rasionalitas Dalam Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Berdasarkan Undang–Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 (Prespektif Ekonimi Konvensional Dan Ekonomi Syariah).” Journal Inicio Legis 6, no. 1 (2025): 13–22.
Oroh, Armando Stefanus, Harly S. Muaja, and Maarthen Y. Tampanguma. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pelaporan Harta Kekayaan Oleh Penyelenggara Negara Menurut Undang–Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 1999.” Lex Privatum 14, no. 1 (2024).
Pradipta, Firwanda Sandi, and Ermania Widjajanti. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Korupsi Dalam Pengelolaan BUMN Pasca Revisi UU No 1 Tahun 2025.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 4, no. 2 (2025): 80–90.
Primayogha, Egi. “Kasus Korupsi Di Lingkungan BUMN: Marak Dan Rawan Pada Sektor Finansial.” Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) , March 21, 2022.
Putra, Nandha Risky, and Rosa Linda. “Korupsi Di Indonesia: Tantangan Perubahan Sosial.” Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi 8, no. 1 (June 25, 2022): 13–24. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.898.
Putri, Tiyas Asri, and Tundjung Herning Sitabuana. “Pengawasan Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Terhadap Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN).” Sibatik Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan 1, no. 7 (May 19, 2022): 1003–18. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i7.118.
Suhartono, Suhartono, Raodahtul Jannah, and Namla Elfa Syariati. “Kajian Kritis Terhadap Fenomena Fraud Bumn; Tinjauan Fraud Diamond Theory.” Islamic Economic and Business Journal 4, no. 2 (December 29, 2022): 20–46. https://doi.org/10.30863/iebjournal.v4i2.3757.
Suyatmiko, Wawan Heru. “Memaknai Turunnya Skor Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia Tahun 2020.” Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi 7, no. 1 (June 25, 2021): 161–78. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.717.
Tampubolon, Andi Thomas, Mompang L. Panggabean, and Manotar Tampubolon. “Kajian Kriminologi Korupsi Di Sektor Publik Di Indonesia.” Berajah Journal 4, no. 2 (2024): 211–34.
Tolan, Willy Yohanes, and Hudi Yusuf. “Dampak Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Khusus Terhadap Investasi Asing: Analisis Kasus Kejahatan Korporasi Di Sektor Industri.” Iic: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia 1, no. 9 (2024): 5095–5111.
Ulfiah, Ulfiah, Eryus Amran Koto, and Sari Ningsih. “Kebijakan Satu Peta Dan Satu Data Dalam Program Percepatan Pengadaan Informasi Geospasial Dasar Dan Informasi Geospasial Tematik (Kerja Sama Badan Informasi Geospasial Dengan Badan Usaha Milik Negara).” ANTASENA: Governance and Innovation Journal 2, no. 1 (June 10, 2024): 42–53. https://doi.org/10.61332/antasena.v2i1.171.
Wal, Zeger Van der. Singapore’s Corrupt Practices Investigations Bureau: Guardian of Public Integrity. Guardians of Public Value: How Public Organisations Become and Remain Institution. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
Warman, Ade Tiyo, Ameytia Rizka Aulia, Josua Armando Tamba, Nurul Fazira Damanik, Thessa D Triputri Manurung, and Ramsul Nababan. “Peran Sila Kedua Pancasila Dalam Menjamin Hak Atas Kesetaraan Di Hadapan Hukum.” Realisasi : Ilmu Pendidikan, Seni Rupa Dan Desain 2, no. 2 (2025): 135–41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bayu Tri Pamungkas, Zurria Sakinah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
