Legal Philosophy Perspectives on Abortion Regulation in Indonesia

Authors

  • Yuwono Prianto Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Hanivah Fitriyani Universitas Rarumanagara
  • Jessica Sandini Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Keiko Patricia Liwe Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.61831

Keywords:

abortion, legal philosophy, women’s rights, human rights, progressive law

Abstract

Abortion in Indonesia is a complex legal issue involving moral, religious, and human rights dimensions. Regulations in the Criminal Code, Health Law, and Government Regulation No. 61 of 2014 demonstrate tension between protecting the right to life of the fetus and respecting women's rights to bodily autonomy and reproductive health. This research analyzes abortion regulations from legal philosophy perspectives—natural law, legal positivism, and progressive law—and assesses the extent to which regulations reflect substantive justice. The method employed is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and theoretical approaches. Research findings indicate that natural law emphasizes the fetus's right to life as a natural right, legal positivism focuses on the certainty of written rules, while progressive law encourages responsiveness to social needs, particularly protecting women from the risks of illegal abortion. The perspectives of major religions in Indonesia generally reject abortion, although positive law provides limited exceptions for medical emergencies and pregnancies resulting from rape. Abortion regulation in Indonesia faces a normative dilemma as the law tends to be repressive while social reality demands greater protection for women. Regulatory reform that is more humanistic and progressive is needed, emphasizing balance between protecting the fetus's right to life and fulfilling women's rights to achieve substantive justice in accordance with Pancasila legal ideals and the constitution.

References

Abdul Djamil. (1984). Psikolog Dalam Hukum. Amirco.

Anggara, B. (2021). HARMONISASI PENGATURAN ABORSI DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.36733/jhshs.v2i2

Bismar Nasution. (2007). Bahan Kuliah Filsafat Hukum Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan.

D. Stretton. (2008). Defending life: a moral and legal case against abortion choiceby Francis J Beckwith. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(11), 793–797.

Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia. (2012). Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya. Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an.

Fitriani, N. (2024). Pengaruh The Pure Theory Of Law Dalam Perkembangan Hukum Positivisme Di Indonesia. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx

Gunawan, S. (2001). Analek Konfusius. Yayasan Bina Darma.

Junaedi, O. (2025). Lex Laguens: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan RELASI ANTARA MORALITAS DAN HUKUM: PERSPEKTIF FILSAFAT HUKUM KONTEMPORER. LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1), 204–216. https://jurnal.dokterlaw.com/index.php/lexlaguens

Khairunnisa, M., Ulum, K. M., Makraja, F., & Nimah, R. (2024). ABORSI DI PERSIMPANGAN HUKUM DAN AGAMA: Perspektif Politik Hukum Kesehatan dan Islam di Indonesia. Usrotuna: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 01(02), 178–211.

Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia. (2014). Alkitab: Terjemahan Baru. Lembaga Alkitab Indonesia.

Linda Firdawaty. (2017). Aborsi dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Islam (Analisis terhadap Peraturan Pemerintah No. 61 tahun 2014 tentang Kesehatan Reproduksi). Al-’Adalah, 14(1), 107–130.

Narada Thera. (1993). Dhammapada: Kitab syair kebenaran (Terj. oleh Bhikkhu Santosa). Yayasan Dhammadipa Arama.

Ni Putu Ratih Puspitasari, I Made Sepud, & Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. (2021). Tindak Pidana Aborsi Akibat Perkosaan. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 2(1), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.2.1.3058.135-139

Randy Alcorn. (2000). Prolife Answers to Prochoice Arguments. Multnomah Publishers.

Ratna Winahyu Lestari Dewi. (2013). Wajib Simpan Rahasia Kedokteran Versus Kewajiban Hukum Sebagai Saksi Ahli. Perspektif, 18(3), 136–147.

Royhan, J., Gaisan, S., & Pasundan, U. (2024). Hukum Dan Moralitas: Dimensi Filosofis Dalam Penegakan Hukum. Praxis:Jurnal Filsafat Terapan, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.11111/praxis.xxxxxxx

Simbolon, C. (2025). Problem Relasi Hukum dan Moral dalam Legitimasi Tindak Aborsi pada Perempuan Korban Pemerkosaan di Indonesia. LEVIOPUS: Legal Review of Palapa Justicia, 1(1), 1–23. https://www.kpai.go.id/publikasi/kpai-pro-kontra-aborsi-legal-aturan-ini-terbungkus-

Sinaulan, R. L. (2021). Buku Filsafat Hukum (2nd ed.). Zahir Publishing.

Titib, I. M. (1996). Weda: Sabda suci yang abadi. Paramita.

Titik Triwulan. (2009). Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Praktik Aborsi bagi Kehamilan Tidak Diharapkan (KTD) Akibat Perkosaan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.

Tri Rusmala Ratnawati, E. (2022). ABORSI DAN HAK HIDUP JANIN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA DAN KESEHATAN. Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.37631/jrkhm.v1i1.3

UU Kesehatan No. 36 Tahun 2009 Jo. PP No. 61 Tahun 2014.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

How to Cite

Yuwono Prianto, Hanivah Fitriyani, Jessica Sandini, & Keiko Patricia Liwe. (2025). Legal Philosophy Perspectives on Abortion Regulation in Indonesia. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.61831