Ihyaussunnah: Journal of Ulumul Hadith and Living Sunnah

Peer Review Process

P-ISSN: 2809-1787 | E-ISSN: 2830-5108

Policy Rigorous & Efficient Evaluation Standards

Ihyaussunnah: Journal of Ulumul Hadith and Living Sunnah strictly maintains rigorous standards of peer review while ensuring maximum operational efficiency. The initial review process typically takes at least 2 months. All research articles undergo comprehensive peer evaluation before any editorial verdict is delivered.

Double-Blind Peer Review Minimum 2 Expert Reviewers

Key Characteristics of Review Governance

Independent Expert Review Dual Expert Evaluation Every research article is rigorously assessed by at least two suitably qualified external scholars in the field. Editor-in-Chief Authority Final publication decisions rest with the Editor-in-Chief based on substantive evaluation reports.	Editorial & Board Guidance International Advisory Board Board members lend strategic insight, academic advice, and guidance for specific manuscript evaluations. Editorial Team Support Managing Editors and Assistants safeguard process integrity while ensuring rapid turnaround times.
Review of Novel Submissions Direct Submission Routing Submissions made directly to the journal are sent to reviewers assigned by the Editor-in-Chief. Editorial Verdicts The Editorial Board determines acceptance, rejection, or revision based strictly on received peer commentaries.	Referred Paper Protocols Cross-Journal Referrals The journal benefits from reviews performed by established peer journals via manuscript referral. Supplementary Review Option Editors decide promptly on referred papers and may commission additional reviews when necessary.

Editorial Decision Benchmarks

1. Methodological Rigor Editors assess whether the submission reports well-conducted research using appropriate analytical methods and scholarly procedures.

2. Data-Backed Conclusions Drawn conclusions must be fully justified, substantiated, and supported by empirical evidence or hadith text analysis presented.

3. Scientific Contribution Assessments of subjective priority are excluded; all accepted papers must make an incremental, significant, or novel contribution to scholarship.

Peer Review Workflow

Initial Screening Desk review for scope, guidelines adherence, and similarity checks.

Peer Review Double-blind review conducted by at least two domain experts.

Revision Stage Authors address reviewers' comments and submit revised drafts.

Final Decision Editor-in-Chief issues final acceptance, rejection, or referral.

Questions Regarding the Review Status? Authors can monitor submission progress in real time or reach the editorial desk via email.

Contact Editorial Desk

All submitted papers are evaluated solely on scholarly quality, novelty, and intellectual contribution to the field of Hadith studies and living Sunnah. For further details on review workflows or referral inquiries, please visit our Editorial Information Center.