PENGARUH PENILAIAN RISIKO AUDIT, TEKANAN KETAATAN, DAN SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN AUDITOR MENDETEKSI KECURANGAN DENGAN PENGALAMAN AUDIT SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/isafir.v7i1.72150Keywords:
Audit Risk Assessment, Obedience Pressure, Professional Skepticism, Auditor's Fraud Detection Ability, Audit ExperienceAbstract
Abstract, This study aims to analyze the effect of audit risk assessment, obedience pressure, and professional skepticism on auditors' ability to detect fraud, with audit experience as a moderating variable at the Inspectorate of South Sulawesi Province. The research employed a quantitative approach using a survey method through questionnaire distribution to auditors. The sampling technique used was saturated sampling, where the entire population of 61 auditors was included as research respondents. Data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The results indicate that audit risk assessment and professional skepticism have a positive and significant effect on auditors' ability to detect fraud. Meanwhile, obedience pressure has a negative and significant effect on auditors' ability to detect fraud.
References
Agustinus, D. M. (2025). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi, Dan Brainstorming Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Dengan Skeptisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Ilmiah MahasiswaAkuntansi, 14(2), 108–121Https://Doi.Org/10.33508/Jima.V14i2.8368
Agustina, F., Nurkholis, N., & Rusydi, M. (2021). Auditors’ professional skepticism and fraud detection. International Journal of Research in BusinessandSocialScience,10(4),275287.https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1214
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior : Frequently asked questions.April, 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Akbar, A. A., & Muluk, M. A. (2025). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional, risiko audit, dan ketaatan prosedur terhadap tanggung jawab auditor atas kecurangan. Sinoveka: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi Dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 33–49.
Akbar, A., Ermawati, Y., Suratini, Pasolo, F., & Sutisman, E. (2022). The effect of audit risk and workload on fraud detection through auditor professional skepticism. Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 5(2), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.57178/atestasi.v5i2.355
Anggelita, N., Elta, A., & Meilani, M. Y. (2025). The effect of auditor experience and professional skepticism on fraud detection with workload as a moderating variable. Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 1(2), 79–90.
Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2009). Auditing and assurance services: An integrated approach (13th ed.). Pearson Education.
Aryotama, H. (2024). Pengaruh skeptisme profesional, pengalaman auditor, dan independensi terhadap kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. COSTING: Journal of Economic, Business and Accounting, 7(1), 72–86.
Ashari, F. R., Kara, M., & Bulutoding, L. (2020). Pengaruh Money Ethics danKetidakpercayaan Kepada Fiskus Terhadap Tax Evasion dengan Keimanan sebagai Variabel Moderasi. ISAFIR: Islamic Accounting and Finance Review, 1(2), 14–28.
Baso, S. P., Dawu, L. M. T., & Panie, A. A. (2025). Pengaruh skeptismeprofesional, pengalaman auditor dan tekanan waktu terhadap kemampuan auditor eksternal dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 10(1), 1–15.118
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Neal, T. L. (2019). Fraudulent financial reporting: 2018 analysis of U.S. public companies. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Brown-Liburd, H., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2015). Big data and audit judgment: How experience and analytics shape auditors’ decisions. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 431–446
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press.
Fikriyah, N. H., & Kuntadi, C. (2023). Pengaruh kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi fraud: Kompetensi, profesionalisme dan pengalaman audit. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, Akuntansi, Dan Pajak (JIEAP), 5(2), 144–158.
Firdayanti, A., & Suwandi, M. (2025). Pengaruh pengalaman, risiko audit, dan tekanan ketaatan terhadap ketepatan pemberian opini audit (moderasi skeptisisme profesional). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 6(1), 40– 55.
Ghozali, Imam. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS. Edisi 7. Semarang
Hasnawiah, H. (2022). Pengaruh pengalaman, independensi, keahlian dan skeptisisme profesional auditor terhadap pendeteksian kecurangan. Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi Mulawarman, 17(1), 14–28.
Hidayat, R., & Wulandari, P. (2022). Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) in Research: Narrative Literature Review. Open Access Indonesia Journalof Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.37275/oaijss.v5i6.141.
Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). The effects of professional skepticism on auditors’ fraud judgments and decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(1), 85–114.
Herfransis, V. P., & Rani, P. (2020). Pengalaman Memoderasi Penilaian Risiko Kecurangan, Skeptisisme, dan Independensi Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan. EQUITY, 23(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.34209/equ.v23i1.1765
Ikhwan, M., Suwandi, M., & Suhartono. (2020). Pengaruh faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja auditor dengan dimoderasi oleh kecerdasan spiritual (Studi kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Makassar). ISAFIR: Islamic Accounting and Finance Review, 1(1), 28–39.
Indrawati, L., Cahyono, D., & Maharani, A. (2019). Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Independensi Auditor dan Pelatihan Audit Kecurangan Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 3(4), 393.
Jamilah, S., Fanani, Z., & Chandrarin, G. (2007). Pengaruh gender, tekanan ketaatan, dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap audit judgment BT - Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 10.
Jannah, R., Aditiya, R., Suhartono, Sari, N. R., & Fadhilatunisa, D. (2021). Penerapan akuntansi forensik dan kompetensi sumber daya manusia terhadap upaya pencegahan fraud dalam pengelolaan dana desa. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 7(1), 46–67
Kartim, & Sutisman. (2022). Independence and competence on audit fraud detection: Role of professional skepticism as moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v26i1.823
Kinanti, N. A. E., & Novita, N. (2025). The influence of skepticism, auditor experience, and professional ethics on fraud detection. Jurnal AplikasiAkuntansi,10(1),1326.https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v10i1.610
Komang, R., Juanaristo, E., Gusti, I., Made, A., Dwija Putri, A., Sujana, I. K., & Ardiana, A. (2024). Red flags, competence, time budget pressure and audit risk: Effect on auditor’s ability to detect fraud. Journal of Economics, Finance andManagementStudies, 7(8), 4925–4933.
Larasati, D., & Puspitasari, W. (2019). Pengaruh Pengalaman, Independensi, Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Penerapan Etika, Dan Beban Kerja Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 6(1), 31–42. Https://Doi.Org/10.25105/Jat.V6i1.4845
Lastri, S., Syamsidar, S., & Alfis, D. (2023). Seberapa baik fungsi skeptisisme profesional auditor pada BPKP Provinsi Aceh. JABI: Jurnal Akuntansi Berkelanjutan Indonesia, 5(2), 121–136.
Lestari, N. L. P. R., & Putra, I. M. P. D. (2021). Pengaruh pengalaman audit dan overconfidence auditor terhadap efektivitas penilaian risiko audit. E- Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(7), 1765–1778.
Lonto, M. P., & Pandowo, A. (2025). Does audit quality mediate the effect of information technology and competence on internal audit effectiveness? Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Auditing Indonesia, 29(1), 27–39.
Maknun, A. B., Bakri, A. A., Ibrahim, F. N., & Bijaang, D. (2025). Pengaruh kompleksitas tugas, tekanan ketaatan, dan pengalaman kerja terhadap kualitas audit. Center of Economic Students Journal (CSEJ), 3(2), 77–91.
Maulida, K., & Novianti, N. (2023). Audit experience, independence, and professional skepticism against fraud detection: Time pressure as a moderating factor. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 8(2), 381. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i2.331
MEA. (2024). Analisis independensi, pengalaman dan skeptisisme dalam deteksi kecurangan. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA, 8(1), 55–68.
Narayana, A. A. S., & Ariyanto, D. (2020). Auditors’ experience as moderating effect investigative abilities and understanding of red flags on fraud detection. International Research Journal of Management, IT and SocialSciences,7(1),205216.https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n1.837
Natalia, N. K. L., & Latrini, M. Y. (2021). Dampak pengalaman, skeptisisme profesional, dan kompetensi pada kemampuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 31(4), 987–1005.
Nirmala, N. P. A. A., Ekayani, N. S., & Miati, N. L. P. M. (2023). Pengaruh self- efficacy, tekanan ketaatan, kompleksitas tugas dan pengalaman auditor terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Warmadewa, 4(1), 88– 102.
Nova, P., & Rahmawati, U. (2024). Analisis penentuan materialitas dan risiko audit dalam opini audit di masa pandemi. Jurnal Pajak Dan Keuangan Negara, 6(2), 112–124.
Pande, P., Suryanawa, K., & Rasmini, K. (2025). The effect of experience and time budget pressure on the auditor’s ability to detect fraud (moderasi red flags). EPaper Bisnis, 2(3), 53–68.
Prameswari, Purwohedi, D., & Respati, U. K. (2022). Factors affecting auditor’s ability to detect fraud. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan Dan Auditing (JAPA), 3(1), 78–96.
Puspawardani, I., & Pesudo, D. A. A. (2022). Tekanan ketaatan, pengetahuan, pengalaman auditor, dan audit judgment. Jurnal PETA, 7(1), 55–70.
Putu, I., Anggiriawan, B., Agung, A., Jayawarsa, K., Gede, I., & Pratama, S. (2024). Auditor independence and experience in fraud detection: The crucial role of professional skepticism. IJESSS, 5(5), 1240–1248.
Rahman, A., & Sari, D. P. (2020). Dampak skeptisisme profesional berlebihan terhadap kualitas judgment auditor. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 11(3), 512–526
Rahmadi, R. (2011). Pengantar metodologi penelitian. Antasari Press. Rumondang, S., Zakaria, A., & Noviarini, D. (2023). Analisis pengaruh self- efficacy, pengetahuan auditor dalam mendeteksi kekeliruan, dan tekanan ketaatan terhadap audit judgment. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan Dan Auditing (JAPA), 4(3), 201–215.
Sari, M. P., Hapsari, A. N., & Wibowo, R. A. (2022). Tekanan waktu, beban kerja, dan peran pengalaman auditor dalam penilaian risiko audit. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 26(2), 141–155.
Sahir, S. H. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian. KBM Indonesia.
Sari, S. (2020). The effect of audit risk assessment and task specific knowledge in fraud detection skill: Internal audit effectiveness as an intervening variable. Finest: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 4(1), 1–9.
Setiabudhi, H., Suwono, Setiawan, Y. A., & Karim, S. (2025). Analisis Data Kuantitatif dengan Smart PLS 4. Borneo Novelty Publishing.
Siringorongo, M. J., Hasugian, C., Simanjuntak, S. I. R., Lumbangaol, M. B., & Simanjuntak, M. D. (2025). Auditor capability on the effectiveness of red flags in detecting fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(3), 1803– 1814. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i3.3301
Sodikin, A. A., & Iskak, J. (2024). Kompetensi audit dan red flags auditor dalam mendeteksi kecurangan dengan peran skeptisisme profesional. Syntax Literate, 9(4), 250–265.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.ALFABETA, CV.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suhayati, E., & Thufailah, A. A. (2024). Fraud detection: Professional skepticism and quality control system. Jurnal Economia, 20(3), 374–387. https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v20i1.5649
Waruwu, M. (2023). Pendekatan penelitian pendidikan: Metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed method. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 2896– 2910. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v7i1.6187
Wijaya, T. (2021). Kompetensi auditor dan risiko bias dalam penerapan skeptisisme profesional. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 23(2), 201– 214.
Welly, W., Ghazali, R., & Zuraidah, I. (2022). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional auditor, kompetensi auditor, dan pengalaman auditor terhadap pendeteksian kecurangan. Jurnal Media Wahana Ekonomika, 19(2), 99–113.
Yuan, K., Wen, Y., & Tang, J. (2020). Regression Analysis with Latent Variables by Partial Least Squares and Four Other Composite Scores: Consistency,73 Bias and Correction. Structural Equation Modeling: AMultidisciplinaryJournal,27,33https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.164 7107.
Yuliana, D., & Puspita, A. F. (2025). The effect of professional skepticism and auditor experience on the ability to detect fraud with time pressure as moderating variable. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 18(2), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.30813/jab.v18i2.8104
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
