Hubungan Kualitas Informasi Aplikasi Goodreads dengan Penentuan Preferensi Buku pada Bibliofilia

  • Aliyah Yasyfi Saffanah Universitas Padjadjaran
    (ID)
  • Agus Rusmana Universitas Padjadjaran
    (ID)
  • Rully Khairul Anwar Universitas Padjadjaran
    (ID)
Keywords: Bibliophiles, Book cataloging site, Book preferences, Information quality

Abstract

The digital era has prompted online sites to provide an information that aligns with users’ needs. Information accessibility could help bibliophiles in order to retrieve an information and decide on their book preferences effectively and efficiently. This research aims to analyze the correlation between Goodreads’ information quality and bibliophiles’ book preference. Information quality is measured through three (3) indicators: accuracy, timeliness, and relevancy. This research employed a quantitative method through a survey. The sampling method used was simple random sampling due to the homogency of the population. The population consisted of X @basebuku followers whom using Goodreads, in which 230 people, and 70 people were selected. The results, analyzed using Spearman’s Rank Correlation, indicate a moderate correlation between information quality and book preferences. Furthermore, each indicators indicate a correlation with book preferences, yet there’s difference on the strength of correlation. Accuracy and book preferences indicate a weak correlation; timeliness and book preferences indicate a moderate correlation; relevancy and book preferences indicate a strong correlation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asy’ari, Maulidya Makalao, D. A., & Irawan. (2023). Analisis Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dalam Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 152–175. https://doi.org/10.30603/tjmpi.v11i2.3796

Daghall, A., & Parazajder, M. (2024). Shared book reading communities: A comparative study of the StoryGraph as an alternative to Goodreads. University of Borås.

Foo, Z.-Y., Ng, K.-W., Haw, S.-C., & Anaam, E. A. (2024). Analysis of Book Preferences Among Visitors in Library. TEM Journal, 13(1), 422–430.

Frederico, M. C. V. (2020). A Rua dos Livros: Cartografia Multissituada do Garimpo e Comércio Literário no Rio de Janeiro. PPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro.

Htait, A., Fournier, S., Bellot, P., Azzopardi, L., & Pasi, G. (2020). Using Sentiment Analysis for Pseudo-Relevance Feedback in Social Book Search. ICTIR 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409256.3409847

Jafari, Y., Sabri, N., & Bahrak, B. (2020). Investigating the effects of Goodreads challenges on individuals reading habits. CoRR, 1–9. http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.03932

Kostic, Z., Jessup, J., Baglioni, J., Weeks, N., Dreessen, J. P., Chen, N., & Liu, T. (2020). Visual Companion for Booklovers. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2011.00329

Kumar, R., & Pamula, R. (2020). Social Book Search: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(1), 95–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9647-x

Lee, S., & Son, Y. J. (2020). Extended decision field theory with social-learning for long-term decision-making processes in social networks. Information Sciences, 512, 1293–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.10.025

Lujia, Y. (2023). The Development Characteristics of Modern Private Book Collection in Jiangsu and Its Social Direction. Library Journal, 42(8), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.13663/j.cnki.lj.2023.08.005

Namjoo, C., & Soohyung, J. (2015). BookLovers’ World: An Examination of Factors Affecting Continued Usage of Social Cataloging Sites. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 3022–3035. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi

Sabri, N., Sadeghian, S., & Bahrak, B. (2020). A cross-country study on cultural similarities based on book preferences. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-020-00695-y

Salsabil, Z., & Arfa, M. (2019). Efektivitas Website femaledaily.com dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Informasi Pengguna. Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 8(2), 199–210.

Sholihudin, N., Ulfa, N. S., & Setyabudi, D. (2015). Pengaruh Kelengkapan Informasi, Akurasi Informasi, Kepercayaan Streamer, dan Streamer Attractiveness terhadap Perceived Persuasiveness yang Dialami Penonton Shopee Live. Interaksi Online, 12(3), 1–13.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta.

Wahyuningsih, S. (2016). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Umur Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, dan Solvabilitas terhadap Audit Delay (Studi pada Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI). E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 1–12.

Windiani, N. A., Hasyim, A., & Hutari, N. A. (2024). Pergeseran Sumber Informasi dari Youtube ke TikTok pada Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan, 2(1), 159–166. https://jurnal.unusultra.ac.id/index.php/jisdik

Published
2025-03-14
How to Cite
Yasyfi Saffanah, A., Rusmana, A., & Anwar, R. K. (2025). Hubungan Kualitas Informasi Aplikasi Goodreads dengan Penentuan Preferensi Buku pada Bibliofilia. Literatify : Trends in Library Developments, 6(1), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.24252/literatify.v6i1.51925
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 0 times