• Irsyad Adhi Waskita Hutama Urban and Regional Planning Program, Department of Architecture and Planning, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Didik Kristiadi Urban and Regional Planning Program, Department of Architecture and Planning, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada


Informal-like settlements such as urban kampong is a human habitat which has similar characteristics as an urban slum. They co-exist within urban ecosystem but progressing backward to sub-standard living quality. The recent status of urban kampong is worsened due to lack of basic service and sometimes neglected from spatial plan and program. Spatial reconfiguration is seen as an alternative model to revitalize informal-like urban kampong by creating the condition where the positive loop is available within the kampong. This model can be built by connecting and integrating the inner structure of the kampong's spatial layout to the network of city structure. This research aims to re-configure the spatial arrangement of urban kampong for gradual changes from informal condition to be a more formal, vibrant, and robust neighborhood. This method involves several approaches such as acknowledging the informality of urban kampong, understanding the favorite place and place attachment, reconfiguring new spatial layout, and comparing syntactical properties between existing and new spatial plan. The research result depicts a new spatial design proposal for urban kampong becoming more integrated and connected with the city structure, resulting in the progress of self-regeneration works by itself.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Irsyad Adhi Waskita Hutama, Urban and Regional Planning Program, Department of Architecture and Planning, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Lecturer at Urban and Regional Planning Program, Department of Architecture and Planning, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada


Abbott, J. (2002). An analysis of informal settlement upgrading and critique of existing methodological approaches. Habitat International, 26(3), 303–315.

Can, I., & Heath, T. (2015). In-between spaces and social interaction: a morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 1–19.

Davis, J., & Uffer, S. (2013). Evolving Cities: Exploring the relations between urban form resilience and the governance of urban form. London School of Economics and Political Science, (Published by the London School of Economics and Political Science 2013), 1–5.

Dovey, K. (2015). Sustainable Informal Settlements? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 179, 5–13.

Dovey, K. (2016). Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit (First Edit). London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.

Gehl, J. (2006). Life Between Building: Using Public Space (Sixth Edit). The Danish Architectural Press.

Greene, M. (2003). Housing and community consolidation in informal settlements: A case of movement economy. Space Syntax Symposium.

Herman, M., Birasa, N., & Claude, B. (2014). Land Use Consolidation and Poverty Reduction in Rwanda. 2014 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, 5.

Hernbäck, J. (2012). Influence of Urban Form on Co-presence in Public Space: A Space Syntax Analysis of Informal Settlements in Pune, India. Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Division of Urban and Regional Studies, Master in.

Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the Machine (electronic). United Kingdom: Press Syndicate.

Hillier, B., Greene, M., & Desyllas, J. (2000). Self-generated neighbourhoods: The role of urban form in the consolidation of informal settlements. Urban Design International, 5(2), 61–96.

Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space (First Edit). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutama, I. A. (2016). Combining the Activity-Space Pattern with Dwellers Perception to Explore the Sense of Place of an Urban Kampung. In D. F. Swasto & I. Hidayati (Eds.), International Conference of Indonesian Architecture and Planning (pp. 66–79). Yogyakarta: Dept of Architecture and Planning, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Hutama, I. A.W. (2018). The Hidden Structure of Organic Informal-like Settlements in Jogjakarta City: An Investigation of Socio-Spatial Relationship in an Urban Kampung. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Penguin Books.

Jiang, B. (2015). Axwoman 6.3: An ArcGIS Extension for Urban Morphological Analysis. Retrieved from

Karimi, K., & Parham, E. (2012). An Evidence Informed Approach To Developing an Adaptable Regeneration Programme for Declining Informal Settlements. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 1–27). Saniago de Chile.

Kim, Y. O., & Penn, A. (2004). Linking the Spatial Syntax of Cognitive Maps To the Spatial Syntax of the Environment. Environment & Behavior, 36(4), 483–507. Retrieved from 10.1177/0013916503261384

La Rosa, D., Privitera, R., Barbarossa, L., & La Greca, P. (2017). Assessing spatial benefits of urban regeneration programs in a highly vulnerable urban context: A case study in Catania, Italy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 180–192.

Lutafali, S., & Khoja, F. (2011). Economic and ecological partnership revitalizing urban slums : A case study of Cairo. International Journal of Ecology & Development, 18(W11), 29–45.

Menshawy, A. El, Aly, S. S., & Salman, A. M. (2011). Sustainable Upgrading of Informal Settlements in The Developing World, Case Study: Ezzbet Abd El Meniem Riyadh, Alexandria, Egypt. Procedia Engineering, 21, 168–177.

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city : Urbanity , vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116.

Morales, J., Flacke, J., Morales, J., & Zevenbergen, J. (2017). Mapping Urban Accessibility in Data Scarce Contexts Using Space Syntax and Location-Based Methods. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy.

Omer, I., & Goldblatt, R. (2012). Urban spatial configuration and socio-economic residential differentiation: The case of Tel Aviv. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(2), 177–185.

Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.

Sastrosasmito, S. (2009). Compact Kampungs : Formal and Informal Integration in The Context of Urban Settlements of Yogyakarta , Indonesia. Journal of Habitat Engineering, 1(1), 119–134.

Setiawan, B. (1998). Local dynamics in informal settlement development: A case study of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from

Taki, H. M. (2017). Slum Revitalizing Plan of Baghdadiyah by Spatial Re-Modelling Configuration. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, 4(2), 69–80.

Tunas, D. (2008). The Spatial Economy in the Urban Informal Settlement. International Forum on Urbanism (IFoU).

Uddin, N. (2018). Assessing urban sustainability of slum settlements in Bangladesh: Evidence from Chittagong city. Journal of Urban Management, (March), 1–11.

Ujang, N., & Zakariya, K. (2015). The Notion of Place, Place Meaning and Identity in Urban Regeneration. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 709–717.

UN-Habitat. (2015). The role of ICT in the proposed Urban Sustainable Development Goal and the New Urban Agenda, 12. Retrieved from

van Nes, A., & Rueb, L. (2009). Spatial Behaviour in Dutch Dwelling Areas: How Housing Layouts Affects the Behaviour of its Users. 7th International Space Syntax Symposium, 1–16.

Vasku, M. (2013). Generative Improvement of Street Networks Based on Space Syntax Applied in a case study on an informal settlement in Jeddah. Spatial Performance and Space Syntax, 1, 367–374.

How to Cite
Abstract viewed = 709 times