Modalities Used By Indonesian and American In Political Debate Discourse (A Comparative Study)

Rabiatul Adawiyah

Abstract


Modalities in Political Debate Discourse. This study is aimed at investigating modalities used by the speakers of political debate in two countries; Indonesia and USA. This study is a comparative study which uses descriptive qualitative in analysing and displaying data. Both data were taken from youtube.com on April 2014. Firstly, the result of this study shows that the speakers of political debate in Indonesia and America used three values of modality; high, median and low value of modality. A way of choosing modalities does not only with a correct grammar; but also from the functional point of view. Politicians tended to use high value of modality to show their high commitment toward opinion or argument, and presenter tended to use median and low values of modality in offering the other speakers rather than the high value of modality; although the presenter actually wanted to state a requirement that should be followed. Lastly, the English speakers are more explicit to put their selves as the subject of assessment rather than the Indonesian speakers of political debate.

Keywords


Functional grammar; modality; political debate; discourse;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloor, Thomas & Meriel. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English. Oxford University Press Inc. Oxford.

Butt, David., et al. 1995. Using Functional Grammar. Claredon Printing Pty. New South Wales.

Cook, Guy. 1990. Discourse. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Coulthard, Malcolm. 1990. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. Longman Inc. New York.

Dijk, Teun A. Van. 1998. Ideology a Multidisciplinary Approach. SAGE Publications. London.

Dixon, R.M.W. 2005. A Semantic Approach to English Grammar. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. Longman Inc. New York.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. 'Functional Diversity in Language as Seen from a Consideration of Modality and Mood in English', Foundations of Language 6: 322 - 361.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold. London.

McCarthy, Michael. 1991. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Peneitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV.ALFABETA. Bandung.

Wetherell, Margareth., et al. (2001). Discourse Theory and Practice. Sage Publications. London.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/JAd.v17i1i1a1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Adabiyah is indexed by:

       MAS             

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under BY-NC-SA

__________________________________________________________
Jurnal Adabiyah
Fakultas Adab & Humaniora UIN Alauddin
ISSN Print : 1412-6141 ISSN Online : 2548-7744

Jl.H.M.Yasin Limpo No. 36 Samata, Gowa, Sulawesi Selatan
Phone: (0411)841879 Fax: (0411) 8221400
Email: jurnal.adabiyah@uin-alauddin.ac.id