THE STRATEGIES APPLIED BY EFL LEARNERS TO OVERCOME MORPHO-SYNTACTIC DEVIATION IN SECTION 2 OF TOEFL TEST IN A PESANTREN-BASED UNIVERSITY

  • Abdur Rofik Fakultas Bahasa dan Sastra Universitas sains Alqur'an Wonosobo Jawa Tengah
    (ID)

Abstract

The study aims at revealing the morphological and syntactical deviations patterned by EFL students, and their strategies to respond structure and written expression of TOEFL-Like Test. 70 students participated in this study. The students who were from study programs of English Literature, Technical Information, and Political Sciences of Universitas Sains Alqur’an were involved in this study. Their feedback were analyzed based on a qualitative approach. The findings exposed that 70 test-takers constructed 1.711 morpho-syntactic deviations. The most six morpho-syntactic problematic queries based on EFL students’ responses are epithet in parallel structure, subject-verb needs, object needs in noun phrase forms, quantifier-noun agreement, inversion of negative expression, connector subject pronoun in the adjective clause. Concerning strategies adopted by the students, they revealed that paying to the object of the preposition, focusing on past participles, making in mind that verbs of the sentence agree to the subject in cases of prepositional phrases, making in mind verbs agreement on an expression of quantity cases, and focusing on the present participle questions need to be put in. Furthermore, this study suggested that the EFL students are encouraged to take into consideration those six most morpho-syntactic deviations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda, R. (2016). Problems with section two ITP TOEFL test. SIELLE: Studies in English Language and Education. 3(1). 35-49. Retrieved from: http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/3387

Booij, G. (2007). The grammar of words: An introduction of morphology 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brinton, L. J., & Brinton, D. M. (2010). The linguistics structure of modern English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Broderick, J., P. (1975). Modern English linguistics: A structural and transformational grammar. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.

Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2002). An introduction to English morphology: Words and their structure. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Frank, M. (1972). Modern English: A practical reference guide. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Greenbaum, S. & Nelson, G. (2009). An introduction to English grammar 3rd edition. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Handayani, F. (2019). Structure and Written Expression Section on Paper-Based TOEFL : Perceived Difficulties by Nursing Students of Poltekes Solok, West Sumatera. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Educational Studies. 4(2). 135-149. Retrieved from: https://ejournal.iainbukittinggi.ac.id/index.php/educative/article/view/2393

Miller, J. (2002). An introduction of English syntax. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Kamlasi, I., & Nokas, D. N. (2017). Grammatical errors in writing of the second class students of SMA Kristen 1 Soe. Methatesis Journal. 1(1). 130-140. Retrieved from: https://jurnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/metathesis/article/view/238

O’dwyer, B., T. (2000). Modern English structure: Forms, function, and position. Canada: Broadviews Press, Ltd.

Phillips, D. (2001). Longman complete course for the TOEFL test: Preparation for the computer and paper tests. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc.

Pyle, M. A. & Munoz, M. E. (1991). Cliffs TOEFL preparation guide. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons (SAE) Pte. Ltd.

Rahmanu, I. W. E. D., Kariati, N. M., & Shishido, K. (2020). Learners’ subject-verb agreement and simple past defect analysis on written text in learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Soshum: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(2), 212-224. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31940/soshum.v10i2.1806

Ramadhan, B. N., Fauziati, E., & Suparno. (2018). A morpho-syntactic error analysis of Indonesian EFL students’ writing. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Research (IJSER). 6(8), 45-49. Retrieved from: https://www.ijser.in/archives/v6i8/IJSER1833.pdf.

Rahman, K. (2020). Learning amid crisis: EFL students’ perception on online learning during covid-19 outbreak. Eternal: English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal. 6(2). 179-194. Retrieved from: http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/Eternal/article/view/13555

Rofik, A. (2020). Grammatical accuracy of Indonesian-English translation. Journal Of Applied Studies In Language, 4(2), 321-330. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v4i2.2173

Rofik, A., Christina, C. & Hidayah, A. (2020). An English proficiency study on students of developing Islamic higher education. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching. 6(2). 86-97. Retrieved from: https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/linguists/article/view/3008

Staples, S., Biber, D. E., & Reppen, R. (2018). (Accepted/In press). Using Corpus-Based Register Analysis to Explore the Authenticity of High-Stakes Language Exams: A Register Comparison of TOEFL iBT and Disciplinary Writing Tasks. Modern Language Journal. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12465

Subekti, A. S., (2020). Covid-19-Trigerred online learning implementation: Pre-servis English teachers’ beliefs. Metathesisi: Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching. 4(3). 232-248. Retrieved from: https://jurnal.untidar.ac.id/index.php/metathesis/article/view/2591/1731

Wishon, G. E. & Burks, J. M. (1980). Let’s write English revised edition. New York: Litton Educational Publishing International.

Published
2021-06-30
Section
Volume 7, Number 01, June 2021
Abstract viewed = 800 times