STUDENTS' LITERACY CULTURE IN NON DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY AREA (PESANTREN)

  • Elda Yulia Ryandini Alumnus of postgraduate student of UNESA
    (ID)
  • Devi Puspitasari Postgraduate Student of State University of Malang (UM)
    (ID)

Abstract

Literacy is a social practice. In the past, literacy was only focused on reading and writing. Recently, literacy can happen everywhere, become a culture and people can make meaning of the practice. Literacy also cannot be separated from technology nowadays. Most people become digital natives to accomplish their daily business in which it is also the literacy activities. This study wants to clarify students’ preference in reading, to know students’ multimodal literacy, to probe students’ literacy practice in Pesantren, and to probe students’ literacy cultures if there are some digital technology stuffs. By applying qualitative approach using questionnaires and semi-structured interview to students, the results showed that mostly students were not really love reading (medium) in Pesantren because of no any book collections, the obligation of their own regulation to finish what they have read, boredom reading, no much time to read due to some other activities in Pesantren and preference to sleep rather than to read in Pesantren. Students also preferred reading novel as their multimodal literacy in Pesantren. The following answers, students conveyed that they felt so-so after doing literacy practice. The last, the answers related to the literacy culture if they meet some digital technology stuffs were various. Most students would not read at all at home when they get holiday. Most students also were very agreed if they have access to digital technology stuffs in Pesantren, but the claims also showed that the presence of digital technology stuffs would disturb their reading quality. Therefore, the students’ literacy cultures in non-digital technology area are average because they have various main activities of Pesantren to do and the availability of the access to some digital technology stuffs in Pesantren are seen disturbing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Elda Yulia Ryandini, Alumnus of postgraduate student of UNESA
English and Literature Study Program.
Devi Puspitasari, Postgraduate Student of State University of Malang (UM)
English Language Education Department

References

Barton, David (Ed.)., Mary Hamilton (Ed.)., & Roz Ivanic (Ed.). (2000). Situated Literacies (Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge.

Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction

to Theory and Methods (Fifth Edition). USA: Pearson.

Burnett, Robert., Anna Brunstrom., & Anders G. Nilsson. (2003). Perspectives on Multimedia (Communication, Media and Information Technology). Chicester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Collins, James., & Richard K. Blot. (2003). Literacy and Literacies (Texts, Power, and Identity). The United States: Cambridge University Press.

Eksi, Gonca., & Burcak Yilmaz Yakisik. (2015). An Investigation of Prospective English Language Teachers’ Multimodal Literacy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 199. 464-471. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net

Febriani, Suci Ramadhani et al. (2020). Development of Literacy in Islamic Education in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era for Elementary School. Journal of Islamic Education. 4(2). 79-96. Retrieved from: http://kjie.ppj.unp.ac.id.

Fraenkel, Jack R., - Norman E. Wallen, - Helen H. Hyun. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.

Gamble, Nikki (Ed.)., & Nick Easingwood (Ed.). (2000). ICT and Literacy (Information and Communications Technology, Media, Reading and Writing). London: Continuum.

Hart, Jeffrey A. (2004). Technology, Television and Competition (The Politics of Digitial TV). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ho, Caroline M. L (Ed.)., Kate T. Anderson (Ed.)., & Alvin P. Leong (Ed.). (2011). Transforming Literacies and Language (Multimodality and Literacy in the New Media Age). London: Continuum.

Louis, Cohen., Lawrence Manion., & Keith Morrison. (2007). Research Methods in Education 6th Edition. London: Routledge.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (Third Edition). USA: Sage Publications.

Pahl, Kate., & Jennifer Rowsell. (2005). Literacy and Education (Understanding the New Literacy Studies in the Classroom). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Sewell, William C., & Shawn Denton. (2011). Multimodal Literacies in the Secondary English Classroom. The National Council of Teachers of English. 100.5. 61-65.

Shariman, Tenku Putri Norishah Tenku., Norizan Abdul Razak., & Nor Fariza Mohd. Noor. (2014). The Multimodal Literacy Practices of Malaysian Youths in a Digital Environment. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 141. 1171-1176. https://www.sciencedirect.com

Street, Brian V., & Adam Lefstein. (2007). Literacy (An Advanced Resource Book). London: Routledge.

Suharso, Putut., & Sarbini. (2018). Coastal Community Response to the Movement of Literacy: a study on literacy culture in Demak pesantren’s. E3S Web of Conference. 47. 1-11. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184707004

Yusuf, Rusli et al. (2020). A Comparison of Student Environmental Literacy: Public and Islamic Schools in Banda Aceh, Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change. 12(9). 222-239. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net

Published
2021-06-30
Section
Volume 7, Number 01, June 2021
Abstract viewed = 243 times