Fiduciary Regulation Updates to Accommodate Legal Certainty and Notary Authority in the Removal of Fiduciary Guarantees

Indy Multahada; Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni; Emmy Latifah

doi:10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i2.62868

Authors

Indy Multahada Universitas Sebelas Maret
Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
Emmy Latifah Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i2.62868

Keywords:

notary, regulatory updates, Removal of fiduciary guarantees

Abstract

This study examines the weaknesses in the regulations governing the removal of fiduciary guarantees. Although the obligation to remove is regulated in relevant laws and regulations, practice shows that thousands of fiduciary guarantees have not been removed even after being paid off, creating legal uncertainty and hindering debtors from reusing the collateral. This study aims to analyse the urgency of updating fiduciary guarantee regulations and to formulate a regulatory framework that can strengthen legal certainty, including proposals for special markings on evidence of fiduciary guarantee objects and confirmation of the authority of the parties entitled to carry out the removal. This study uses a normative-empirical research method, employing a legislative and conceptual approach, with primary legal sources (related legislation) and secondary legal sources in the form of literature and interviews. This study found a gap between regulation and practice. The results of the study indicate the need for regulatory updates, including special markings on fiduciary collateral objects, as is the practice for encumbrances, as well as the affirmation of authority to legal subjects for the removal process. Regulatory updates are expected to create a more accountable removal mechanism and increase legal certainty for all parties.

References

Alaslan, Amtai, Bangun Suharti, Laxmi, Nanang Rustandi, Eko Sutrisno, and Siti Rahmi. Penelitian Metode Kualitatif. Tasikmalaya: Perkumpulan Rumah Cemerlang Indonesia, 2023. https://osf.io/preprints/thesiscommons/smrbh.

Andyanto, Hidayat. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditur Yang Menggunakan Jaminan Fidusia.” Jendela Hukum 6, no. 1 (2019): 15–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24929/fh.v6i1.1548.

Fadli, Muhammad Rijal. “Memahami Desain Metode Penelitian Kualitatif.” Humanika 21, no. 1 (2021): 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075.

H.D Stout, and De Betekenissen van de Wet. Theoretisch-Kritische Beschouwingen over Het Principe van Wetmatigheid van Bestuur. Zwolle: W.E.J Tjeenk Willink, 1994. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol6.no6.716.

Herlina, Elis, and Sri Santi. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pada Perjanjian Pembiayaan Dengan Fidusia Tidak Terdaftar.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 25, no. 2 (2018): 277–99. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss2.art4.

Jaudah, Tsuroyyaa Maitsaa’, Puji Sulistyaningsih, and Dakum. “Konsekuensi Atas Penghapusan Jaminan Fidusia Yang Tidak Dilakukan.” Media of Law and Sharia 5, no. 3 (2024): 282–92. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v5i4.148.

Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Jurnal Crepido 01, no. 01 (2019): 13–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22.

Kusumawardhani, Sang Ayu Made Ary, Ni Putu Yunika Sulistyawati, and Sang Ketut Oka Giri Yadnyana. “Pelaksanaan Penghapusan (Roya) Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Pemberlakuan Sistem Fidusia Online (Studi Kasus: Kantor Notaris I Gede Perdana Artha, SH., M. Kn).” Kerta Dyatmika 22, no. 1 (2025): 44–59. http://ejournal.undwi.ac.id/index.php/kertadyatmika.

Maulana, Ayang Fristia, Rindy Dwi P, Zulfikar, Adinda Santi K, and Putri Fatma F. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen Di Tinjau Dari Undang Undang Nomer 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia.” Jurnal Kritis Studi Hukum 9, no. 12 (2024): 1–10.

Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press. Mataram-NTB: Mataram University Press, 2020.

Muhram, La Ode. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Bandung: Media Sains Indonesia, 2022.

Mukhtarudin, Fathan Elan Yuukhaa, and Budi Santoso. “Analysis of Fiduciary Guarantee Arrangements and Legal Protection of Creditors in Fiduciary Agreements in Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 6, no. 8 (2023): 183–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i11.642%0AAbstract.

Mulyadi, Lilik. “Teori Hukum Pembangunan Prof. Dr. Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, S.H., LL.M.” Jurnal Hukum Indonesia 8, no. 2 (2009): 1–29. https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/upload_file/img/article/doc/kajian_deskriptif_analitis_teori_hukum_pembangunan.pdf.

Nandari, Ni Putu Sawitri, Dewa Krisna Prasada, Kadek Julia Mahadewi, Tania Novelin, and Dewa Ayu Putri Sukadana. “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Tidak Dilakukan Penghapusan (Roya) Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Kredit Lunas.” Jurnal Hukum Sasana 9, no. 1 (2023): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v9i1.2249.

Puspareni, Annisa Septia, and Fifiana Wisnaeni. “Relevansi Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa Terhadap Kewenangan Notaris.” Notarius 16, no. 2 (2023): 753–63. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.41360.

Rozi, Achmad Fahrur, Siti Qomariyah, Lintang Iliyan Albatul, and Laily Fitroh Nur Aini. “Analisis Konsep, Prinsip, Dan Implemantasi Hukum Jaminan Dalam Menjamin Kepastian Dan Perlindungan Bagi Kreditur Dan Debitur Di Indonesia.” Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 1, no. 3 (2023): 141–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14986182.

Saputra, Gede Aditya, and Ida Ayu Sukihana. “Pengaturan Sanksi Terhadap Kelalaian Penerima Fidusia Dalam Hal Penghapusan Jaminan Fidusia.” Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 12 (2021): 1039–49. https://jurnal.harianregional.com/index.php/Kerthanegara/article/view/74407.

Saputra, Muhammad Renal Anugrah, Dzaky Hanif, and Mohammad Alvi Pratama. “Pemikiran Mochtar Kusumaatmadja Tentang Hukum Sebagai Sarana Pembangunan : Kajian Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Konsep Dinamika Hukum.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 4, no. 1 (2025): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.11111/dassollen.xxxxxxx.

Spaak, Torben. “Meta-Ethics and Legal Theory: The Case of Gustav Radbruch.” Law and Philosophy 28, no. 3 (2009): 261–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-008-9036-8.

Subagiyo, Dwi Tatak. Hukum Jaminan Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Jaminan Fidusia (Suatu Pengantar). Surabaya: UWKS PRESS, 2018.

Tampubolon, Manotar. Metode Penelitian Metode Penelitian. Vol. 3. Padang: PT GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI, 2023. http://repository.unpas.ac.id/30547/5/BAB III.pdf.

Toreh, Debora K. A., Hendrik Pondaag, and Susan Lawotjo. “Tunjauan Yuridis Atas Kekuatan Eksekutorial Hak Tanggunagn Dan Fidusia (Studi Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.21/PUU-XVIII/2020).” Lex Privatum IX, no. 10 (2021): 55–63.

Vadilla, Cica, Nabilla Alya Rahmah, and Baidhowi Baidhowi. “Pelanggaran Kode Etik Profesi Terhadap Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta.” As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan 12, no. 1 (2023): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51226/assalam.v12i1.495.

Widiarty, Wiwik Sri. Buku Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Publika Global Media, 2024.

Yudha, Fernando Manggala, Candra Mahardika Efendi, Syaefa Wahyuni, Roy Andika Stevanus Sembiring, Dekrit Dirga Saputra, Arya Ahmad Bangsa Diria, and Elli Ruslina. “Kajian Deskriptif Analitis Tentang Teori Hukum Pembangunan Prof. Dr. Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, S.H., LL.M.” Ensiklopedia of Journal 7, no. 1 (2024): 362–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v7i1.2627.

Interview with Mr. Deddhy Herianto Sihotang as the Analysis of Monitoring Report Results at the Legal Services Division of the Regional Office of the Ministry of Law of the Special Region of Yogyakarta, on September 22, 2025.

https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4123563/kemenkumham-diy-minta-notaris-dukung-penghapusan-jaminan-fidusia, accessed on May 24, 2025.

https://panduan.ahu.go.id/doku.php, accessed on November 18, 2025.