The Effect of the Spontaneous Group Discussion (SGD) Learning Model on Students’ Learning Outcomes in the Excretory System Topic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-ahya.v7i3.41425Keywords:
model pembelajaran Spontaneous Group Discussion, hasil belajarAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of the Spontaneous Group Discussion (SGD) learning model on students’ learning outcomes in the topic of the excretory system. A quantitative approach was employed using a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group. The research sample consisted of two eighth-grade classes at SMPN 1 Batang, Jeneponto Regency, selected through purposive sampling. Each class comprised 35 students, assigned as the experimental and control groups. Data were collected using a learning outcomes test and analyzed using an independent samples t-test. The results showed that the mean posttest score of the experimental class was 76.14, which was higher than that of the control class, which obtained a mean score of 67.57. The statistical analysis yielded a Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.000 < 0.05, indicating that the Spontaneous Group Discussion (SGD) learning model had a significant effect on improving students’ learning outcomes in the topic of the excretory system.
Downloads
References
Asriani, A., Rohmah, M., & Priyono, S. (2020). Pengaruh penerapan metode Spontaneous Group Discussion (SGD) terhadap hasil belajar mata pelajaran ekonomi bisnis pada peserta didik kelas X tingkat SMK di Buay Pemuka Bangsa Raja. UTILITY: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 4(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.30599/utility.v4i1.628
Cirkony, C. (2023). Flexible, creative, constructive, and collaborative: The makings of an authentic science inquiry task. International Journal of Science Education, 45(17), 1440–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2213384
Cui, T., & Wang, J. (2024). Empowering active learning: A social annotation tool for improving student engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(2), 712–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13403
Faizah, H., & Kamal, R. (2024). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(1), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v8i1.6735
Kerimbayev, N., Umirzakova, Z., Shadiev, R., & Jotsov, V. (2023). A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
Lestari, S. (2021). Upaya meningkatkan aktivitas dan hasil belajar Biologi dengan model problem based learning pada materi bakteri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 9(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v9i2.42921
Murniati, N., Febyasha, R., & Irwandi, I. (2020). Hasil belajar kognitif dan berpikir kritis siswa menggunakan model pembelajaraan kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) di MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 4(1), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.4.1.94-105
Pratiwi, E. D., Masykuri, M., & Ramli, M. (2021). Active learning strategy on higher education biology learning: A systematic review. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 6(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v6i1.7345
Rahayu, P., & Widayati, A. (2019). Effectiveness of Think Pair Share and Spontaneous Group Discussion towards problem solving skill student of X accounting graders SMK Negeri 1 Wonosari. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 17(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v17i2.28698
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.
Saputra, R. Y., & Harjono, N. (2024). Model kooperatif Teams Games Tournament dalam meningkatkan keaktifan dan hasil belajar IPA siswa SD. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 10(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v10i1.6811
Suandi, I. N. (2022). Metode diskusi kelompok untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar Matematika kelas VI SD. Journal of Education Action Research, 6(1), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v6i1.45083
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintrón, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
Utami, P., Kadir, K., & Herlanti, Y. (2021). Meta-analisis pembelajaran kooperatif di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v7i1.39574.
Xu, X., Bos, N. A., Wu, H., & Lin, X. (2023). Student engagement and learning outcomes: An empirical study applying a four-dimensional framework. Medical Education Online, 28(1), Article 2268347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2268347
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pipi Arpina, Ainul Uyuni Taufiq, Wahyuni Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
