Intervensi Koroner Percutan pada Kegagalan Cangkok Vena Safena: Laporan Kasus

Penulis

  • Sidhi Laksono FK UHAMKA
  • A Tenri Syahirah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/alami.v9i1.49954

Kata Kunci:

Stenosis Cangkok Vena Saphena, Intervensi Koroner Perkutaneus

Abstrak

Penanganan pasien yang terdiagnosis penyakit multivessel arteri koroner utamanya dengan riwayat diabetes saat ini adalah dengan cangkok arteri coroner bypass (CABG) sebagai terapi utama. Cangkok arteri toraks internal secara luas dianggap sebagai cara terbaik untuk merevaskularisasi penyakit arteri koroner lanjut karena bekerja dengan sangat baik dan bertahan lama. Namun, revaskularisasi penuh sulit dicapai dengan hanya penggunaan cangkok arteri saja, sehingga memerlukan cangkok vena saphena (SVG). Namun sebaliknya, SVG tidak memiliki tingkat integritas struktural yang sama, dan malfungsi mereka dikaitkan dengan outcome gejala jantung yang buruk dan tingkat kematian yang lebih tinggi. Pada kasus ini, pasien seorang pria berusia 80 tahun yang memiliki riwayat operasi CABG 13 tahun lalu merasakan nyeri dada yang menjalar hingga ke punggung disertai keringat dingin. Selain diabetes, pasien juga memiliki riwayat hipertensi dan merokok. Pada elektrokardiografi, ditemukan tanda  iskemia dan hasil ekokardiogram menunjukkan disfungsi diastolik ringan disertai penurunan fungsi sistolik ventrikel kiri dengan ejection fraction 48%. Hasil laboratorium menunjukkan peningkatan kadar troponin dan peningkatan glukosa darah sewaktu. Setelah dilakukan pemasangan stent dengan drug-eluting stent (DES) pada cangkok vena saphena diagonal, pasien diterapi dengan terapi double antiplatelet, beta-blocker, nitrat, dan statin.

Referensi

1. Weltert LP, Audisio K, Bellisaro A, et al. External stenting of vein grafts in coronary artery bypass grating: interim results from a two centers prospective study. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2021;16(1):1-7. doi:10.1186/s13019-021-01406-0
2. Guida G, Ward AO, Bruno VD, et al. Saphenous vein graft disease, pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment. A review of the literature. Journal of Cardiac Surgery. 2020;35(6):1314-1321. doi:10.1111/jocs.14542
3. Back L, Ladwiniec A. Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: Current Challenges and a Review of the Contemporary Percutaneous Options for Management. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(22):1-12. doi:10.3390/jcm12227118
4. Janiec M, Dimberg A, Lindblom RPF. Symptomatic late saphenous vein graft failure in coronary artery bypass surgery. Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2023;36(4):1-9. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivad052
5. Patted SV, Porwal SC, Ambar S, et al. Saphenous vein graft pci registry- a single centre experience. Indian Heart Journal. 2020;72:S15. doi:10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.048
6. Karaaslan, Maden O, Kanal Y, et al. Association of CABG SYNTAX score with long term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing SVG PCI. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences. 2022;26(11):3893-3902. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202206_28957
7. Ren Y, Song B, Li J, et al. Underlying mechanisms of saphenous vein graft stenosis after coronary artery bypass caused by clipping of the side branches: an experimental study. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2022;14(4):1088-1098. doi:10.21037/jtd-22-235
8. Lin L, Lu W, Wang X, et al. Short-term outcomes of drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for de novo saphenous vein graft lesions in coronary heart disease. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2023;10(March):1-8. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2023.982880
9. Xenogiannis I, Zenati M, Bhatt DL, et al. Saphenous Vein Graft Failure: From Pathophysiology to Prevention and Treatment Strategies. Circulation. 2021;144(9):728-745. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052163
10. Ferrari G, Geijer H, Cao Y, Souza D, Samano N. Percutaneous coronary intervention in saphenous vein grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. 2021;55(4):245-253. doi:10.1080/14017431.2021.1900598
11. Gharibeh L, Ferrari G, Ouimet M, Grau JB. Conduits’ Biology Regulates the Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Basic to Translational Science. 2021;6(4):388-396. doi:10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.11.015
12. Guida GA, Angelini GD. Pathophysiology and Mechanisms of Saphenous Vein Graft Failure. Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery. 2022;37(Special Issue 1):32-37. doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0133
13. Medranda GA, Nathan S. Contemporary Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: New Insights but Still More Questions. Journal of Society Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2024;(July):102282. doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102282
14. Saidi-Seresht S, James S, Erlinge D, et al. Outcome of Saphenous Vein Graft Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents: A SCAAR Report. Journal of Society Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2024;(June). doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102232
15. Hall AB, Brilakis ES. Saphenous vein graft failure: seeing the bigger picture. Journal of thoracic disease. 2019;11(Suppl 9):S1441-S1444. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.09
16. Gemelli M, Addonizio M, Geatti V, Gallo M, Dixon LK, Slaughter MS, Gerosa G. Techniques and Technologies to Improve Vein Graft Patency in Coronary Surgery. Medical Sciences. 2024; 12(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci12010006
17. Vervoort D, Malik A, Fremes SE. The evolving evidence base for coronary artery bypass grafting and arterial grafting in 2021: how to improve vein graft patency. JTCVS techniques. 2021 Dec 1;10:102-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.09.038

Diterbitkan

2025-02-09

Cara Mengutip

Laksono, S., & Syahirah, A. T. (2025). Intervensi Koroner Percutan pada Kegagalan Cangkok Vena Safena: Laporan Kasus. Alami Journal (Alauddin Islamic Medical) Journal, 9(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.24252/alami.v9i1.49954

Terbitan

Bagian

Case Report