Genetic Variation at Microsatellite Loci in Odorrana hosii (Boulenger, 1891)

  • Djong Hon Tjong Biology Department, Faculty of Matemathic and Natural Sciene, Andalas University
    (ID) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4743-9964
  • Anugrah Viona Agesi Biology Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Andalas University, 25163 Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
    (ID)
  • Dewi Imelda Roesma Biology Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Andalas University, 25163 Padang, West Sumatra, Indonesia
    (ID)

Abstract

The true frog species, Odorrana hosii, found in West Sumatera Indonesia, has high morphological differentiation and also estimated has high genetic variation. A total of 35 O. hosii at a seven location have analyzed using DNA microsatellite markers. Genetic variation of five microsatellite loci provided the highest value of expected heterozygosity (He) for the population in Padang (He= 0.618), while the lowest was the population in Merapi (He= 0.427). There are genetic differences in moderate levels among populations of O. hosii in West Sumatra (FST= 0.108) with inbreeding intrapopulation value (FIS= -0.559), and high value of gene flow among the populations (Nm = 2.061). This study becomes the first molecular data for establishing effective population management conservation.

Author Biography

Djong Hon Tjong, Biology Department, Faculty of Matemathic and Natural Sciene, Andalas University
Biology Department Andalas University

References

Agesi AV. 2011. Variasi Morfometri dan Kariotipe Rana hosii (Boulenger, 1891) di Sumatera Barat. [Skripsi]. Padang: Andalas University.

Alberto FJ, Aitken SN, Alía R, González‐Martínez SC, Hänninen H, Kremer A, Lefèvre F, Lenormand T, Yeaman S, Whetten R, Savolainen O. 2013. Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change–evidence from tree populations. Global Change Biology. vol 19(6): 1645–1661. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12181.

Allendorf FW, Luikart GH, Aitken SN. 2012. Conservation and the genetics of populations. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 34–73.

Arens P, Bugter R, van’t Westende W, Zollinger R, Stronks J, Vos CC, Smulders MJM. 2006. Microsatellite variation and population structure of a recovering Tree frog (Hyla arborea L.) metapopulation. Conservation Genetics. vol 7: 825–835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9112-7.

Arioli M, Jakob C, Reyer HU. 2010. Genetic diversity in water frog hybrids (Pelophylax esculentus) varies with population structure and geographic location. Molecular Ecology. vol 19(9): 1814–1828. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04603.x.

Arruda MP, Costa WP, Recco-Pimentel SM. 2017. Genetic diversity of Morato's Digger Toad, Proceratophrys moratoi: spatial structure, gene flow, effective size and the need for differential management strategies of populations. Genetics and Molecular Biology. vol 40(2): 502–514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0025.

Cervantes I, Goyache F, Molina A, Valera M, Gutiérrez JP. 2011. Estimation of effective population size from the rate of coancestry in pedigreed populations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics. vol 128(1): 56–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00881.x.

Charlesworth D, Willis JH. 2009. The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nature Reviews Genetics. vol 10(11): 783–796. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2664.

Conover DO, Schultz ET. 1995. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. vol 10(6): 248–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89081-3.

Funk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS, Maxell BA, Pilliod DS, Amish S, Allendorf FW. 2005. Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Molecular ecology. vol 14(2): 483–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02426.x.

Fouquet A, Ledoux JB, Dubut V, Noonan BP, Scotti I. 2012. The interplay of dispersal limitation, rivers, and historical events shapes the genetic structure of an Amazonian frog. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. vol 106(2): 356–373. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01871.x.

Frankham R. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conservation Biology. vol 12(3): 665–675. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96456.x.

Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA. 2002. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808999.

Frankham R. 2015. Genetic rescue of small inbred populations: Meta‐analysis reveals large and consistent benefits of gene flow. Molecular ecology. vol 24(11): 2610–2618. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13139.

Gong J, Lan H, Fang SG, Wan QH. 2013. Development and characterization of 13 polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers for the pond green frog (Rana nigromaculata). Journal of Genetics. vol 92(1): 7–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-011-0004-y.

Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A. 2016. Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. vol 31(12): 940–952. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005.

Inger RF, Stuebing RB, Grafe U, Dehling JM. 2017. A Field Guide to the Frogs of Borneo. 3rd ed. Kinabalu: Natural History Publications Borneo. p. 228.

Iskandar DT. 1998. The Amphibians of Java and Bali. Bogor: Research and Development Centre for Biology-LIPI. p. 117.

Jamieson IG. 2011. Founder effects, inbreeding, and loss of genetic diversity in four avian reintroduction programs. Conservation Biology. vol 25(1): 115–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01574.x.

Morgan MJ, Hunter D, Pietsch ROD, Osborne W, Keogh JS. 2008. Assessment of genetic diversity in the critically endangered Australian corroboree frogs, Pseudophryne corroboree and Pseudophryne pengilleyi, identifies four evolutionarily significant units for conservation. Molecular Ecology. vol 17(15): 3448–3463. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03841.x.

Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. vol 89(3): 583-590.

Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity. vol 86(3): 248–249.

Rog S, Ryan MJ, Mueller U, Lampert KP. 2013. Evidence for morphological and genetic diversification of túngara frog populations on islands. Herpetological Conservation and Biology. vol 8(1): 228-239.

Slatkin M. 1981. Estimating levels of gene flow in natural populations. Genetics. vol 99(2): 323-335.

Soto-Azat C, Valenzuela-Sánchez A, Collen B, Rowcliffe JM, Veloso, A, Cunningham AA. 2013. The population decline and extinction of Darwin’s frogs. PLoS One. vol 8(6): 1–11. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0066957.

Taylor SS, Sardell RJ, Reid JM, Bucher T, Taylor NG, Arcese P, Keller LF. 2010. Inbreeding coefficient and heterozygosity–fitness correlations in unhatched and hatched song sparrow nestmates. Molecular Ecology. vol 19(20): 4454–4461. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04824.x.

Twomey E, Vestergaard JS, Venegas PJ, Summers K. 2016. Mimetic divergence and the speciation continuum in the mimic poison frog Ranitomeya imitator. The American Naturalist. vol 187(2): 205–224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/684439.

van Kampen PN. 1923. The amphibia of the Indo-Australian archipelago. Leiden: EJ Brill.

Vences M, Puente M, Nieto S, Vieites DR. 2002. Phenotypic plasticity of anuran larvae: environmental variables influence body shape and oral morphology in Rana temporaria tadpoles. Journal of Zoology. vol 257(2): 155–162. doi:10.1017/S0952836902000754.

Wright S. 1938. Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science. vol 87: 430–431.

Published
2020-06-30
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed = 709 times