Kestabilan Fenotip Tanaman Labu Susu (Cucurbita moschata (Duchesne) Poir “Butternut”) Hasil Budidaya di Sleman D.I Yogyakarta

  • Hetty Nopianasanti Fakultas Biologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
    (ID)
  • Budi Setiadi Daryono Laboratorium Genetika, Fakultas Biologi Universitas Gadjah Mada
    (ID)

Abstract

Butternut pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata 'Butternut') is a horticultural commodity with great potential to be developed as food and medicine. Nutrients and unique shape cause butternut pumpkin to be popular. To supply of butternut pumpkin, required an increase in production which has superior and stable characters. This research aims to determine the stability phenotypic characters of butternut pumpkin in Sleman, Yogyakarta using quantitative data analysis of variance (One Way ANOVA) and qualitative analysis through descriptive phenotype. Based on the results, butternut pumpkin have a uniform phenotype characters but unstable in fruit’s shape and size of plant. Butternut pumpkin plants have 3 different shapes of pear or paprika form including dumbbell shape and gooseneck (pyriform), crispy texture, pale yellow (RHS greyed grange group 65) peel of fruit, strong orange (RHS orange group 24) flesh of fruit, 3-5°brix level of sweetness, long shelf life, and short harvest age (70-90 HST). The cultivated butternut pumpkin in PIAT UGM farmland has greater productivity of 3.1±0.99 kg/plant.

 

References

Babadoost M, and Zitter TA. 2009. Fruit Rots of Pumpkin A Serious threat to the Pumpkin Industry. Plant Disease. vol 93(8): 772–782. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-93-8-0772.

Bisognin DA. 2002. Origin and evolution of cultivated cucurbits. Ciência Rural. vol 32(4): 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782002000400028.

Brown RN, and Myers JR. 2002. A Genetic Map of Squash (Cucurbita sp.) with Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Markers and Morphological Markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. vol 127(4): 568–575.

Daryono BS, dan Maryanto SD. 2017. Keanekaragaman dan Potensi Sumber Daya Genetik Melon. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Daryono B., dan Nofriarno N. 2018. Pewarisan Karakter Fenotip Melon (Cucumis melo L. ‘Hikapel Aromatis’) Hasil Persilangan ♀ ‘Hikapel’ dengan ♂ ‘Hikadi Aromatik.’ Biosfera. vol 35(1): 44–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20884/1.mib.2018.35.1.586.

Ferriol M, Picó B, De Córdova PF, Nuez F. 2004. Molecular diversity of a germplasm collection of squash (Cucurbita moschata) determined by SRAP and AFLP markers. Crop Science. vol 44(2): 653–664. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.6530.

Hazra P, Mandal AK, Dutta AK, Ram HH. 2007. Breeding Pumpkin (Curcubita moschata (Duch. Ex Poir.) for Fruit Yield and Other Character. International Journal of Plant Breeding. vol 1(1): 51–64.

Hendrasty HK. 2003. Teknologi Pengolahan Pangan: Tepung Labu Kuning. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Human S, Loekito S, Trilaksono M, Syaifudin A. 2016. Pemuliaan Mutasi Tanaman Nanas (Ananas comusus (L.) Merr.) Menggunakan Iradiasi Gamma untuk Perbaikan Varietas Nanas Smooth Cayenne. Jurnal Ilmiah Aplikasi Isotop Dan Radiasi. vol 12(1): 13–18. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17146/jair.2016.12.1.3197.

Inan N, Yildiz M, Sensoy S, Kafkas S, Abak K. 2012. Efficacy of ISSR and SRAP techniques for molecular characterization of some cucurbita genotypes including naked (hull-less) seed pumpkin. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. vol 22(1): 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2010.2040512.

Muzzaffar S, Baba WN, Nazir N, Masoodi F. A, Bhat MM, Bazaz R. 2016. Effect of storage on physicochemical, microbial and antioxidant properties of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) candy. Cogent Food & Agriculture. vol 2: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2016.1163650.

Paris HS, Brown RN. 2005. The genes of pumpkin and squash. HortScience. vol 40(6): 1620–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-012-0377-3.

Purnomo, Daryono BS, Sentori MB. 2015. Variability and Intraspecies Classification of Pumpkin (Curcubita moschata (Duch. Ex Lam.) Duch. Ex Poir.) Based on Morphological Characters. International Conference on Biological Sciences, KnE Life Science. vol 2: 286–293. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18502/kls.v2i1.160.

Ramadhani F, Putri LAP, Hasyim H. 2013. Evaluasi Karakteristik Beberapa Varietas Kedelai (Glycine max L.merill) Hasil Mutasi Kolkisin M2 Pada Kondisi Naungan. Jurnal Online Agroekoteknologi. vol 1(3): 453–466.

Riaz S, Malook S, Shah AH, Sarfaraz M, Kazmi SMZ, Abad Z, Jabee S, Zaman RQU, Asif M, Ali Q. 2015. Improvement of secondary metabolites for Cucurbita moschata through tissue culture techniques: An overview. Life Science Journal. vol 12(4): 94–101.

Robinson R. 2000. Rationale and methods for producing hybrid cucurbit seed. Journal of New Seeds. vol 1(3–4): 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J153v01n03.

Šiško M, Ivančič A, Bohanec B. 2003. Genome size analysis in the genus Cucurbita and its use for determination of interspecific hybrids obtained using the embryorescue technique. Plant Science. vol 165(3): 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00256-5.

Suwanto, Suranto, Purwanto E. 2015. Karakterisasi Labu Kuning (Curcubita moschata Duch. ) pada Lima Kabupaten di Provinsi Jawa Timur. El-Vivo. vol 3(1): 61–71.

Tedianto. 2012. Karakterisasi Labu Kuning (Cucurbita Moschata) Berdasarkan Penanda Morfologi dan Kandungan Protein, Karbohidrat, Lemak Pada Berbagai Ketinggian Tempat [Tesis]. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Wu J, Chang Z, Wu Q, Zhan H, Xie S. 2011. Molecular diversity of Chinese Cucurbita moschata germplasm collections detected by AFLP markers. Scientia Horticulturae. vol 128(1): 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.006.

Published
2018-11-26
Section
Research Articles
Abstract viewed = 1831 times