INVESTIGATING CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN ELT: A MODIFIED FIACS-BASED STUDY AT ONE ISLAMIC SECONDARY SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/elite.v13i1.62652Keywords:
FIACS, Islamic Institution , Students talk, Teacher talkAbstract
In many English Language Teaching (ELT) contexts, students tend to remain passive listeners rather than active participants. This imbalance in the classroom interaction impedes the development of learners’ communicative competence and reduces their overall engagement in the learning process. This study aimed to analyze teacher talk and student talk in grade 12 classrooms at SMAS IT Al-Kautsar, which has two classrooms: Annisa’s class (female) and Arrijal’s class (male). It explored the quantity of teachers and students’ talk in ELT and the patterns of increasing students’ talk during classroom activities. Using classroom observations, the researchers applied Zhao’s modified Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS) to analyze interactional patterns and identify the patterns that increase students’ talk. Unlike previous FIACS-based studies that focused primarily on university or foreign-language contexts, this study offers a novel insight by applying the modified FIACS to the Islamic Senior High School classroom, revealing interactional dynamics in gender-segregated learning environments. The findings reveal that teacher talk dominates classroom interaction, accounting for an average of 58.42%, while student talk accounts for only 41.58%, indicating a teacher-centered learning environment. Further analysis identified that the pattern of increasing students’ talk is the “ask closed questions” subcategory. The “ask closed questions” subcategory is more conducive to fostering student engagement, while the “declarative lecture” subcategory prioritizes structured teacher input. Overall, the study emphasizes the importance of teachers adopting more student-centered strategies to strike a balance between classroom interaction and promoting active student participation in English-speaking activities.
Downloads
References
Afidawati, H., Arrasyid, F. I., & Ikawati, L. (2024). Minimizing EFL learners’ speaking anxiety in the post-pandemic era. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 11(1), 107-130.
Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2013). Applying Communicative Approach in Teaching English as a Foreign Language: a Case Study of Pakistan.
Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge.Amatari, V. O. (2015). The instructional process: a review of Flanders’ interaction analysis in a classroom setting. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(5), 43-49. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11 Amatari, V. O. (2015). The instructional process: a review of Flanders’ interaction analysis in a classroom setting. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(5), 43-49. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20150305.11
Ayunda, A., Komariah, E., & Achmad, D. (2021). An Investigation of EFL Classroom Interaction by Using Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System (FIACS). Research in English and Education Journal, 6(2), 89-100.
Chen, J., Jiang, H., Justice, L. M., Lin, T. J., Purtell, K. M., & Ansari, A. (2020). Influences of teacher–child relationships and classroom social management on child-perceived peer social experiences during early school years. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 586991.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
English Conversation Program (ECP) - SMA IT Al-Kautsar Duri. (n.d.). SMA IT Al-Kautsar Duri. https://smait.yayasanal-kautsar.sch.id/ekskul/english-conversation-program-ecp/
Flanders, N. A. (1966). Interaction analysis in the classroom: A manual for observers. Ann Arbor, Mi: School of Education, University. of Michigan
Lehesvuori, S., Ramnarain, U., & Viiri, J. (2018). Challenging transmission modes of teaching in science classrooms: Enhancing learner-centredness through dialogicity. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 1049-1069.
Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. Language teaching research, 24(4), 427-431.
Novianti, D., & Anugrawati, N. (2023). Class interaction analysis in English learning based on Flanders’ interaction analysis category system (FIACS). English Language Teaching Methodology, 3(1), 80-97.
Nurhadi, T., Nugraha, S. I., & Ridwan, I. (2024). Exploring the implementation of task-based language teaching in teaching speaking to secondary EFL learners: A qualitative case study. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 7(5), 1207-1219.
Putri, F. A. (2014). An analysis of classroom interaction by using Flander Interaction Analysis Categories System (FIACS) technique at SMPN 13 Kota Bengkulu in 2013/2014 academic year.
Rizkiyah, F., & Salamah, U. (2023). Analysis of Classroom Verbal Interaction Using Fiacs (Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories System). Darussalam English Journal (DEJ), 3(1), 31-66.
Sainyakit, P., & Santoso, Y. I. (2024). A Classroom Interaction Analysis of Teacher and Students by Using FIACS. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 6(1), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v6i1.3825
Suryati, N. (2015). Classroom interaction strategies employed by English teachers at lower secondary schools. Teflin Journal, 26(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/247-264
Wei, L. (2022). Translanguaging as a political stance: Implications for English language education. ELT journal, 76(2), 172-182.
Wenger, E. (2004). Learning for a small planet: A research agenda. Retrieved on, 9(26), 2004.
Zhao, K., & Boonyaprakob, K. (2022). A Case Study of Chinese Students Learning Thai as a Foreign Language: Flanders Interaction Analysis Category System. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(1), 145-169. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.222110
Zúñiga, C., Cárdenas, P., Martínez, R., & Valledor, L. (2020). Teachers’ classroom practices for citizenship education: experiences of teachers rated as outstanding. Citizenship Social and Economics Education, 19(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047173419887972
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khori Putri Ramadhani, Adrefiza, Failasofah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Once an article was published in the journal, the author(s) are:
granted to the journal right licensed under Creative Commons License Attribution that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship.
permitted to publish their work online in third parties as it can lead wider dissemination of the work.
continue to be the copyright owner and allow the journal to publish the article with the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 license
receiving a DOI (Digital Object Identifier) of the work.










