THE IMPACT OF PEER ASSESSMENT ON STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT

  • Nur Laili Indasari Surabaya State University
    (ID)
  • Oikurema Purwati Surabaya State University
    (ID)
  • Syafiul Anam Surabaya State University

Abstract

Peer Assessment is one of the alternative methods to enhance the students’ motivation and ability in writing. Providing feedback is the goal of peer assessment. It is not an easy task as it is required an ability to deliver the feedback critically and competence to master the knowledge of writing. Therefore, the present study is going to explore the impact of giving feedback in the peer assessment process on students’ recount text and to acknowledge the students’ challenges while giving and receiving feedback in that process. Qualitative study assisted the researcher to get the data. The university students in the second semester became the subjects of the study. Documents and interviews were techniques to collect the data. The results revealed that the students’ first draft and the last draft of recount text got improvements mainly on the aspect of grammar. Meanwhile, most students’ challenges while giving and receiving feedback in the process of peer assessment were the aspect of psychology and the knowledge of grammar. In conclusion, the process of peer assessment which involves giving and receiving feedback provides a positive impact on the students’ recount text and the challenges which are faced by the students can be used as inputs for the lecturer in teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nur Laili Indasari, Surabaya State University
I was a pstgraduate student in Surabya State University, accredited A.  I am interested in English Education.
Oikurema Purwati, Surabaya State University
I was an English lecturer in Surabaya State University
Syafiul Anam, Surabaya State University
I was an English lecturer in Surabaya State University

References

Azarnoosh, M. (2013). Peer Assessment in an EFL Context: Attitudes and Friendship Bias. Language Testing in Asia, 3 (11), 1-10.

Ballantyne, R., et al. (2002). Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Class Using an Action Research Process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (5), 427-441.

Birjandi, P & Siyyari, M. (2010). Self-Assessment and Peer-Assessment: A Comparative Study of Their Effect on Writing Performance and Rating Accuracy. IJAL, 13 (1), 23-42.

Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method (5th ed.). USA: Pearson.

Brown, G. T. L., et al. (2009). Use of Interactive-Informal Assessment Practices. New Zealand Secondary Students’ Conceptions of Assessment. Learning & Instruction, 19 (2), 97-111.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Longman.

Brown, S., et al. (1996). 500 Tips on Assessment. London: Kogan Page.

Carvalho, A. (2013). Students’ Perception on Fairness in Peer Assessment: Evidence from a Problem-Based Learning Course. Teaching in Higher Education, 18 (5), 491-505.

Cheng, K., et al. (2015). Examining the Role of Feedback Messages in Undergraduate Studnets’ Writing Performance during an Online Peer Assessment Activity. Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78-84.

Eksan, R. (2004). Improving Writing Ability of the Second Year Students of SLTPN 18 Malang through Process Writing. Thesis Unpublished. Malang: Postgraduate Program of State University of Malang.

Falchikov, N. (2007). The Place of Peers in Learning and Assessment. New York: Routledge.

Faudi. (2016). The Implementation of Peer Assessment Technique in Teaching Writing. English Education Journal (EEJ), 7 (3), 402-414.

Harmer, J. (2004). How to Teach Writing. England: Pearson Longman.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Iraji, et al. (2016). The Effects of Self- and Peer Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing Performance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6 (4), 716-722.

Kearsley, G. (2000). Online education: Learning and teaching in cyberspace. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Klimova, B. F. (2014). Constraints and Difficulties in The Process of Writing Acquisition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 433-437.

Lin G.-Y., Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness,and attitude toward the system, Computers & Education (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010.

Malehorn, H. (1994). Ten Measures Better than Grading. The Clearing House, 67(6), 323-324.

Miles, Huberman, & Saldana. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). USA: SAGE.

Misianto. (2014). Improving Students’ Ability in Writing an Essay through Peer-Assessment Strategy at the Fifth Semester in Cipta Wacana Christian University of Malang. Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 1 (1), 37-48.

Ohland et al. (2012). The Comprehensive Assessment of TeamMember Effectiveness: Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for self-and Peer Evaluation. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11 (4), 609-630.

Puegphrom & Chiramanee. (2011). The Effectiveness of Implementing Peer Assessment on Students’ Writing Proficiency. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Humanities and Social Sciences (pp. 1-17). Songkla UniversityPutra, Kristian A. (2014). The Implication of Curriculum Renewal on ELT in Indonesia. Parole, 4 (1), 63-75.

Rosa, Coutinho, & Flores. (2016). Online Peer Assessment: Method and Digital Technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 418-423.

Strijbos, J. W. & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unraveling Peer Assessment: Methodological, Functional, and Conceptual Developments. Learning and Instruction, 20, 265-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002.

Suzuki, M. (2008). Japanese Learners’ Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English. TESOL Quarterly, 42 (2), 209-233.

Topping, et al. (2000). Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing between Postgraduate Students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25 (2), 149-169, DOI: 10.1080/713611428.

Topping, K. (2003). Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity, and Utility. Optimizing New Modes of Assessment: In Search of Qualities and Standards, 55-87.

Topping, K.J. (2009). Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48 (1), 20-27, DOI: 10.1080/00405840802577569

Xiao, Y. & Lucking, R. (2008). The Impact of Two Types of Peer Assessment on Students’ Performance and Satisfaction within a Wiki Environment. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 186-193.

Published
2019-12-31
Section
Volume 5, Number 02, December 2019
Abstract viewed = 997 times