COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MEDIATION IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA AND TURKEY

  • Muhamad Ali Muhsim Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
    (ID)
  • Erfaniah Zuhriah Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
    (ID)
  • Ali Hamdan Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
    (ID)
Keywords: Comparative; Mediation; Idonesia; Turkey

Abstract

Mediation as an alternative dispute resolution has its advantages. However, behind the advantages of dispute resolution, it is inversely proportional to the data on the success of mediation in Indonesia which is very low. Based on statistical data from the Semarang Religious Court during 2015-2019, less than 3% of mediations were successful. However, the data on the success of mediation in Indonesia contradicts that of Turkey. During 2017, more than 80% of cases were successfully resolved through mediation. Based on this data, it is necessary to compare the implementation of mediation between Indonesia and Turkey. This research is included in normative juridical research with a qualitative comparative approach. The results of this study indicate that there are similarities and differences in the implementation of mediation between Indonesia and Turkey. The equation lies in the terms of the mediator, the number of mediators and the place. The difference lies in regulation, mediation time, disputes that must be mediated, mediation implementation, mediator title, mediation fees, mediator audit, mediator membership fees and the strength of the peace deed

References

Books:

Abbas, Syahrizal. Mediasi Dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat Dan Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Irawan, Candra. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju, 2017.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan Dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.

Soekanto, Soerdjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2008.

Usman, Rachmadi. Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Journals:

Cengiz, Dilek. “Principles of Mandatory Mediation in Commercial Disputes in Turkish Law with Determinations and Comments on Its Applications.” Annales de La Faculté de Droit d’Istanbul 0, no. 70 (2021): 1–52. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2021.70.0001.

Dost, Suleyman. “Mediation for Disputes in Private Law in Turkey.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 4, no. 10 (2014): 5–9. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v4-i10/1210.

Gaol, Selamat Lumban. “Pengaturan Hukum Mediasi Di Pengadilan Oleh Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 7, no. 1 (2016): 77–110.

Indriani, Maria Evita, and Dewa Nyoman Rai. A.P. “Keabsahan Kesepakatan Penyelesaian Sengketa Wansprestasi Melalui Mekanisme Mediasi Yang Tidak Didaftarkan Ke Pengadilan.” Jurnal Kertha Wicara Vol 09, no. 10 (2020): 1–11.

Irawan, Candra. “Problematika Penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2008 Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Indonesia.” Adhaper 1, no. 2 (2015): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v1i2.11.

Işık, Serpil. “Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Method and Mediation Process in Turkish Law System: An Overview.” Annales de La Faculte de Droit d’Istanbul 65, no. 48 (2016): 55–87.

Kamaruddin. “Mediasi Dalam Pandangan Hukum Progresif Suatu Alternatif Penyelesaian Konflik Keluarga.” Jurnal Al-‘Adl 11, no. 2 (2018): 1–18. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/aladl.v11i2.1246.

Korah, Revy S. M. “Mediasi Merupakan Salah Satu Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Dalam Sengketa Perdagangan Internasional.” Jurnal Hukum UNSRAT 21, no. 3 (2013): 33–42.

Mulyana, Dedy. “Kekuatan Hukum Hasil Mediasi Di Dalam Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Positif.” Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika 3, no. 2 (2019): 177–98. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i2.224.

Ozbek, Mustafa Serdan. “The Principles and Procedure of Penal Mediation in Turkish Criminal Procedure Law.” Angkara Law Review, no. 2 (2012): 153–220.

Pasaribu, Puspa, Rafi Aulia Ibrahim, and Zenitha Syafira. “Dilema Penerapan Asas Peradilan Cepat Setelah Mediasi Gagal.” PALAR (Pakuan Law Review) 7, no. 2 (2021): 425–37.

Praja, Chrisna Bagus Edhita, Budi Agus Riswandi, and Khudzaifah Dimyati. “Urgensi Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta.” Kertha Patrika 43, no. 3 (2021): 275–95. https://doi.org/10.24843/kp.2021.v43.i03.p04.

Purba, Mariah S.M. “Rekonstruksi Perma No. 1 Tahun 2016 Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 13, no. 1 (2018): 20–31. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v13i1.693.

Puspitaningrum, Sri. “Mediasi Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan.” Spektrum Hukum 15, no. 2 (2018): 275. https://doi.org/10.35973/sh.v15i2.1121.

Rahmah, Dian Maris. “Optimalisasi Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 4, no. 1 (2019): 1. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v4i1.174.

Saifuddin, Moh., and Muchamad Choirun Nizar. “Prosedur Pelaksanaan Dan Tingkat Keberhasilan Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama Semarang.” Wahana Akademika 8, no. 1 (2021): 71–78. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21580/wa.v8i1.6572.

Sirullah, Nurul Alimi. “Peran Hakim Mediator Dalam Menunjang Efektifitas Mediasi Di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Keislaman Terateks 5, no. 2 (2020): 99–111.

Usluel, Ash Gurbuz. “Mandatory or Voluntary Mediation Recent Turkish Mediation Legislation and a Comparative Analysis with the EU ’ s Mediation Framework.” Journal of Dispute Resolution 2020, no. 2 (2020): 1–21.

Wiantara, I Komang. “Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, no. 4 (2018): 456–67. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2018.v07.i04.p04.

Wirda Hairani, and Syawaluddin Ismail. “Problematika Mediasi Dalam Kasus Perceraian Di Mahkamah Syariah Langsa.” Al-Qadha 5, no. 1 (2018): 38–47.

Yunari, Afrik. “Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Sebagai Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi.” Inovatif 2, no. 1 (2016): 133–52.

Regulations:

Dispute Law Number 6325 or Turkey

Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts

Internet:

Ilter, Deniz and Attila Dikbas, “Construction Mediation in Turkey and an Overview of the Draft Mediation Law,” 2. 5 April 2022. URL: Https://www.Irbnet.De/Daten/Iconda/Cib14509.Pdf

Kinikoglu, Efe and Yigit Parmaksiz, “Practical Law Q&A: Mediation in Turkey, Morals and Patners, 4 November 2019. 6 April 2020. URL: https://www.bcct.org.tr/news/practical-law-qa-mediation-in-turkey/68731

The United Nations Commission On International Tarde Law (UNCITRAL) “Turkey’s View on Uncitral Draft Mediation Rules”. 9 April 2020. URL: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media/documents/uncitral/en/comments_on_uncitral_draft_mediation_rules_turkey.pdf

Published
2022-05-28
How to Cite
Muhamad Ali Muhsim, Zuhriah, E., & Hamdan, A. (2022). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MEDIATION IMPLEMENTATION IN INDONESIA AND TURKEY. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.28485
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 203 times