Extending Notaries’ Tenure to Age 70 after Constitutional Court Decision No. 84/PUU-XXII/2024

Implications for Professionalism and Regeneration

Authors

  • Difla Nur Maulida Universitas Islam Malang
  • Sunardi Universitas Islam Malang
  • Rahmatul Hidayati Universitas Islam Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.73254

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Notary Tenure, Extension of Tenure, Notary Professionalism, Professional Regeneration

Abstract

Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXII/2024, pronounced on 3 January 2025, changed the retirement age of notaries from 65 years, extendable to 67, to a maximum of 70 years on certain conditions. The change raises the question of how to balance the constitutional rights of senior notaries, the quality of notarial service, and the regeneration of the professional organisation. This article formulates the ratio decidendi of the decision and tests its normative implications for professionalism, accountability, and regeneration. The normative legal study uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, drawing on primary legal materials (the decision, the Notary Office Act, and Minister of Law Regulations Number 17, 22, and 24 of 2025), analysed qualitatively through systematic interpretation against parameters of legal certainty, justice, and utility. The findings show that the Court's reasoning rests on Article 28D(1) of the 1945 Constitution, the principle of rationality, and intolerable injustice, so that the resulting regime is better described as a hybrid, namely a maximum age limit combined with a health requirement, than as a full capacity-based regulation. The health examination tests physical and psychiatric fitness but does not guarantee professional competence; the gap is only partially closed by recommendations from the Notary Supervisory Council. The article's analytical contribution is a three-node model linking capacity screening, professional supervision, and organisational regeneration. The findings are normative implications that require empirical testing.

References

Books:

Adjie, Habib. Hukum Notaris Indonesia: Tafsir Tematik terhadap Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Edisi Revisi. PT Refika Aditama, 2023.

Adjie, Habib. Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Cet. II. PT Refika Aditama, t.t.

Anshori, Abdul Ghofur. Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia: Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. UII Press, t.t.

Arifin, Syamsul. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Medan Area University Press, 2012.

Asikin, Zainal, dan Amiruddin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Pers, 2023.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2021.

Rifai, Ahmad. Digitalisasi Profesi Notaris di Era 5.0. Sinar Grafika, 2025.

Soeroso. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Cet. ke-18. Sinar Grafika, 2023.

Suratman, dan Philips Dillah. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Alfabeta, 2015.

Legislation:

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Majelis Pengawas terhadap Notaris.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 tentang Susunan Organisasi dan Tata Kerja, Tata Cara Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian, serta Anggaran Majelis Pengawas Notaris.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum Nomor 17 Tahun 2025 tentang Formasi Jabatan Notaris dan Penentuan Kategori Daerah.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum Nomor 22 Tahun 2025 tentang Syarat dan Tata Cara Pengangkatan, Cuti, Pindah Wilayah, Pemberhentian, dan Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Notaris.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum Nomor 24 Tahun 2025 tentang Penetapan, Pembinaan, dan Pengawasan Organisasi Notaris.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 84/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris.

Ikatan Notaris Indonesia. Kode Etik Notaris.

Journals:

Darmawan, Rachael Shellofariq, dan Denise Elysia Louise. "A Legal Analysis of the Extension of the Mandatory Retirement Age for Notaries Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 84/PUU-XXII/2024." Academia Open 10, no. 2 (2025). DOI: 10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12941.

Darmayenti. "Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta yang Cacat Hukum Menurut Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris." Unes Journal of Swara Justisia 8, no. 1 (2024): 100–112.

Fridayanti, Dwi. "Kedudukan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap Sumber Hukum di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Putusan MK No. 60/PUU-XXII/2024." Legacy: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan 5, no. 1 (2025): 40–55.

Gani, Gunawan, dan Budi Ispriyarso. "Pertanggungjawaban Notaris atas Perubahan Akta Perusahaan Tanpa Sepengetahuan Pihak Terkait." Notarius 18, no. 3 (2025): 590–605.

Ginting, Milawati Br., Tesalonika Br. Tarigan, dan Muliyani. "Analisis Penerapan Prinsip Akuntabilitas dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan di Kantor Notaris." Journal of Social and Economics Research 7, no. 1 (2025): 1–12.

Hurruzia, Khansa. "The Notaries Continuity in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 84 of 2024." International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) 5, no. 5 (2026). DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v5i5.1553.

Ibadillah, Raden Ziljian, dan Iswandi. "Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 84/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Perpanjangan Usia Jabatan Notaris." Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law 6, no. 1 (2026): 126–139. DOI: 10.22437/limbago.v6i1.53337.

Muna, Neilul. "Formasi Jabatan Notaris dan Penentuan Kategori Daerah Pasca Perubahan." Officium Notarium 2, no. 3 (2023): 210–223.

Patongai, Alny Avasyah R.A., Kurniati, dan Adriana Mustafa. "Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 84/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Batas Usia dan Perpanjangan Masa Jabatan Notaris Perspektif Siyasah Syar'iyyah." Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 4, no. 2 (2026): 88–101.

Pertiwi, Nasda Aninda, Salim H.S., dan Aris Munandar. "Efektivitas Penerapan E-Notary dalam Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris." Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan 4, no. 1 (2023): 20–34.

Pratama, Han Satria, dan Mahendra Wardhana. "Analisis Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 84/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang Perpanjangan Jabatan Notaris." Indonesian Journal of Contemporary Law 2, no. 6 (2026): 1–15.

Prayoga, Meidya Utama, Agus Riewanto, dan Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni. "The Impact of Constitutional Court Decision Number 84/PUU-XXII/2024 on the Retirement Age Limit for Notaries from the Perspective of Justice and Legal Certainty." Siber International Journal of Advanced Law 3, no. 1 (2025): 204–214. DOI: 10.38035/sijal.v3i1.269.

Radbruch, Gustav. "Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946)." Diterjemahkan oleh Bonnie Litschewski Paulson dan Stanley L. Paulson. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 1–11.

Rusnan, Johannes Johny Koynja, dan Ashari. "Bentuk Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Final dan Mengikat (Suatu Kajian Filosofis)." Jurnal Diskresi 3, no. 2 (2024). DOI: 10.29303/diskresi.v3i2.6025.

Sari, F., dan R. Pratama. "Regenerasi Profesi Hukum di Indonesia: Studi pada Organisasi Notaris." Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 51, no. 2 (2021): 245–262. DOI: 10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.245.

Wijaya, Tahta Fortuna Maharani, dan Ery Agus Priyono. "Penerapan Asas Profesionalitas pada Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik." Lex Renaissance 9, no. 2 (2024): 229–255. DOI: 10.20885/JLR.vol9.iss2.art1.

Yudhoyono, Gatot Eko, dan Yunanto. "Peran Kode Etik Profesi Notaris dalam Menjaga Martabat Jabatannya sebagai Pejabat Umum." Notarius 18, no. 3 (2025): 664–680.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-22

How to Cite

Nur Maulida, D., Sunardi, & Hidayati, R. (2026). Extending Notaries’ Tenure to Age 70 after Constitutional Court Decision No. 84/PUU-XXII/2024: Implications for Professionalism and Regeneration. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.73254

Issue

Section

Artikel