EFFORTS TO PREVENT INDICATIONS OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN NOTARIAL DEEDS THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 39 PARAGRAPH (2) OF THE UUJN

CRIMINOLOGY STUDIES

  • M. Jafar Syukur Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Manokwari
    (ID)
  • Marius Suprianto Sakmaf Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Manokwari, Papua Barat
    (ID)
  • Donny Karauwan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Manokwari, Papua Barat
    (ID)
Keywords: Prevention, Criminal, Notarial Deed, Criminology

Abstract

Indications of criminal acts by notaries as state public officials are rife in Indonesia. The existence of notary authority in terms of making authentic deeds continues to reap the spotlight ranging from allegations of forgery of letters, embezzlement, money laundering and false information. This study aims to determine efforts to prevent indications of criminal acts in notary deeds through the application of article 39 paragraph 2 of the UUJB. The type of research used is a literature study with a normative juridical approach. The results showed that Article 39 paragraph 2 of the UUJBN was placed as an important instrument in preventing indications of criminal acts in the authority to make notary deeds, the existence of Article 39 paragraph 2 of the UUJB places notaries on objects that are able to act legally by providing formal certainty for authentic deeds made without causing indications of criminal acts. Procedurally, the application of Article 39 paragraph 2 of the UUJB in the prevention of criminal acts is carried out through the precautionary and systematic principle by requiring notaries to know the facing parties and also pay attention to other aspects including certainty of the day, date, month, year and time of face, signatures, copies of deeds, and minutes of deeds issued. In addition, the roles and responsibilities of notaries in making deeds based on Article 39 paragraph 2 of the UUJB include civil responsibility, code of ethics responsibility, administrative responsibility and criminal responsibility.

References

Amalia, Dita, and Ali Abdullah. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Yang Dilakukan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Wasiat (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 394/Pk/Pdt/2015).” Imanot: Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan 1, no. 1 (2021): 74–101. https://doi.org/https://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/imanot/article/view/2788.

Anzward, Bruce, and Arifin Samuel Candra. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Bagi Notaris Terhadap Akta Yang Mengandung Keterangan Palsu.” Journal de Facto 8, no. 2 (2022): 122–44. http://jurnal.pascasarjana.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/jurnaldefacto/article/view/114.

Arwanto, Bambang, and Adillah Bahirah. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Di Bawah Tangan Dihubungkan Dengan Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pasal 15 Ayat (2) Uu Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.” Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 5, no. 2 (2021): 237–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v5i2.1048.

Dewantara, Antonius Mahendra, and Dika Kirana Larasati. “Implementation of Progressive Law in Enforcement of Environmental Law in Indonesia: The Current Problems and Future Challenges.” Indonesian Journal of Environmental Law and Sustainable Development 1, no. 2 (2022): 237–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijel.v1i2.58044.

Dewi, Nurul Aulia, and Abdul Halim Talli. “Analisis Perbandingan Mazhab Tentang Pelaksanaan Mediasi Dengan Media Telekonferensi.” Mazahibuna, December 17, 2020, 194–211. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V2I2.17818.

Diba, Gassanova Farah, Wira Franciska, and Felicitas Sri Marniati. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Para Pihak Akibat Perbuatan Tindak Pidana Yang Di Lakukan Oleh Notaris.” JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH 4, no. 2 (2022): 427–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v4i2.25412.

Enggarwati, Irene Dwi. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Diperiksa Oleh Penyidik Dalam Tindak Pidana Keterangan Palsu Pada Akta Otentik.” Brawijaya University, 2015.

Hasan, Hamzah. “Criminology in Islam; between Human-Kind and Injustice.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 3, no. 1 (2021): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V3I1.21238.

Hernawati, R A S, and Joko Trio Suroso. “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Hukum Investasi Di Indonesia Melalui Omnibus Law.” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA) 4, no. 1 (2020): 392–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v4i1.557.

Muyassar, Muyassar, Dahlan Ali, and Suhaimi Suhaimi. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Notaris Terhadap Pengingkaran Akta Jual Beli Tanah Bersertipikat Oleh Pihak Yang Dirugikan.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 147–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i1.12446.

Prayitno, Urip, and Moh Saleh. “The Urgency of Applying Article 39 Paragraph (2) UUJN Against Prevention of Indications of Criminal Acts in Notary Deeds.” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan Dan Ekonomi Islam 15, no. 1 (2023): 55–66.

Putri, Intan Manisa Aulia, Mulyani Djakaria, and Yusuf Saepul Zamil. “Akibat Hukum Klausula Pemutusan Secara Sepihak Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Hak Milik Atas Tanah.” ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2020): 223–40. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i1.358.

Rahmadanti, Intan, Herman Fikri, and Fatria Khairo. “PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS BERDASARKAN PRINSIP BASED ON FAULT OF LIABILITY (TANGGUNG JAWAB BERDASARKAN KESALAHAN).” Lexstricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 2 (2022): 103–14.

Rahman, Fikri Ariesta. “Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Mengenal Para Penghadap.” Lex Renaissance 3, no. 2 (2018): 423–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss2.art11.

Ridho, Muhammad. “Analisis Yuridis Dokumen Elektronik Hasil Pengecekan Sertifikat Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Sistem Pembuktian Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Notarius 1, no. 2 (2022): 226–35. https://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/13987.

Sabir, Muhammad, and Rifka Tunnisa. “Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Transaksi Perbankan; Studi Komparatif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.” Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab 2, no. 1 (2020): 80–97. https://doi.org/10.24252/MH.V2I1.14284.

Sarapi, Virgin Venlin. “Analisis Yuridis PertanggungJawaban Notaris Yang Melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik.” Lex Privatum 9, no. 2 (2021): 158–62. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/33160.

Sari, Anita Ratna. “Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Kredit Dengan Menggunakan Surat Palsu (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Barat Nomor 952/PID. B/2019/PN. JKT. BRT.).” Indonesian Notary 2, no. 2 (2020): 3.

Sembiring, Imentari Siin, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. “Bribery In the Private Sector as A Corruption Offense Policy.” Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum 21, no. 2 (2021): 126–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v21i1.24908.

Sugandi, Dalilah Agustiani H, and Aju Putrijanti. “Analisis Terhadap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Jual Beli.” Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 1 (2023): 59–71. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24269/ls.v7i1.6073.

Supardin, and Abdul Syatar. “Adultery Criminalization Spirit in Islamic Criminal Law: Alternatives in Indonesia’s Positive Legal System Reform.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 2 (December 26, 2021): 913–27. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V5I2.9353.

Thahira, Atika. “Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Lingkungan Hidup Ditinjau Dari Konsep Negara Hukum.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 5, no. 2 (2020): 260–74. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.229.

Toruan, Henry Donald Lbn. “The Importance of Using Electronic Deeds to Facilitate The Service and Storage of Notary Archives.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 22, no. 4 (2022): 483–98. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.483-498.

Wardana, Dendik Surya, Iswi Hariyani, and Dodik Prihatin AN. “Pertanggung Jawaban Notaris Terhadap Keabsahan Akta Outentik Yang Dilakukan Secara Electronic Dalam Pembuktian Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 2, no. 2 (2021): 14–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v2i2.24088.

Warsito, Happy, and Herman Adriansyah. “Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Dalam Membuat Akta Oleh Notaris.” Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 11, no. 1 (2022): 24–33. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v11i1.1640.

Yulianti, Elina Dyah, and Tunggul Anshari. “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Bagi Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Otentik Perspektif Pasal 65 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 6, no. 1 (2021): 45–54. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v6i1p45-54.

Published
2023-05-31
How to Cite
Syukur, M. J., Sakmaf, M. S., & Karauwan, D. (2023). EFFORTS TO PREVENT INDICATIONS OF CRIMINAL ACTS IN NOTARIAL DEEDS THROUGH THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 39 PARAGRAPH (2) OF THE UUJN: CRIMINOLOGY STUDIES . Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 102-122. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.40403
Section
Artikel
Abstract viewed = 94 times