Legal Responsibility of Online Transport Platforms for Merchant Losses Due to Fictitious Orders by Online Transportation Drivers Perspective of Consumer Protection Law

Authors

  • Ferby Aprialdi Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rahmad Efendi Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.59224

Keywords:

Legal responsibility, digital platforms, fictitious orders, consumer protection, merchants

Abstract

This study examines the legal responsibility of digital mobility platforms for merchant losses resulting from fictitious orders made by online transportation drivers, viewed from the perspective of consumer protection law. Using an empirical legal research method, the study combines normative analysis of laws such as the Consumer Protection Law and the ITE Law with field data obtained through interviews with the owner of the Burger Taqwa business. The findings reveal that fictitious orders often stem from weaknesses in the verification system and dishonest driver behavior. Although platforms like Gojek and Grab have implemented policies to delete fictitious orders and offer compensation, their enforcement is inconsistent and lacks transparency. Legal protections for merchants remain limited in practice, as the current regulatory and platform mechanisms prioritize end-consumers over business partners. The study highlights the need for stricter supervision, clearer legal accountability, and improved enforcement mechanisms to ensure fair protection for merchants in the digital economy ecosystem.

References

Book:

Hardani. Ustiawaty, J. Andriani H. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif, 2017.

Hartatik, Hartatik, Arief Yanto Rukmana, Efitra Efitra, Iqbal Ramadhani Mukhlis, Almasari Aksenta, Luh Putu Rara Ayu Ratnaningrum, and Zefri Efdison. Tren Technopreneurship: Strategi & Inovasi Pengembangan Bisnis Kekinian Dengan Teknologi Digital. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia, 2023.

Sugyono. Metode Penelitian: Kualiatatif, Kuantitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

International Conventions/Legislation:

Republik, Indonesia. “Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi Dan Informatika Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi.” Republik Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2016): 1188–97. https://osf.io/nf5me%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.012%0Ahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373546%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.011%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.011%0Ahttp://programme.exo.

Republik Indonesia. “Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Perlindungan Konsumen.” Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999, no. 8 (1999): 1–19. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/45288/uu-no-8-tahun-1999.

Scientific Journals and Publications:

Dalimunthe, Achmad Sudiyar, Muhammad Ihsan, Rukaesih Achmad Maolani, and Dwi Haryanto. “Analisis Dan Pengukuran Risiko Bagi Penumpang Kendaraan Umum Roda Dua Di Jalan Raya Kota Jakarta Dan Kabupaten Bekasi.” Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Keuangan 2, no. 3 (2021): 611–28.

Hakim, Grace Martian. “Analysis Of Factors Affecting Interest In Use Of Indrive Applications Using The Utaut2 Model.” Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (INTECOMS) 6, no. 1 (2023): 353–62.

Mulyani, A. “Analisis Penerimaan Dan Penggunaan Teknologi Aplikasi Ojek Online Menggunakan Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Technology.” Jurnal Humanistika 2, no. 3 (2018): 25–30.

Nur Muhammad Wildanu, Yuswalina, and Dodi Irawan. “Sanksi Bagi Pelaku Ojek Online Yang Melakukan Order Fiktif Menggunakan Aplikasi ‘Fiktif.’” Journal of Sharia and Legal Science 1, no. 2 (2023): 95–104. https://doi.org/10.61994/jsls.v1i2.176.

Made Sinthia Sukmayanti, and I Made Sudirga. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Driver Ojek Online Yang Mengalami Kerugian Akibat Tindakan Konsumen Yang Melakukan Pesanan Fiktif.” Synotic Law: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 3 (2022): 177–85. https://doi.org/10.56110/sl.v1i3.16.

Oldy Dumanauw, Paul A. T. Kawatu dan Nancy S. H. “Studi Perilaku Pada Pengendara Ojek Online Tentang Safety Riding Di Kota Manado.” Jurnal KESMAS 7, no. 5 (2018): 55–76.

Indonesia, Republik. “UU ITE Nomor 19 Tahun 2016.” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 44, no. 8 (2011): 287.

Tampubolon, Wahyu Simon. “Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Sociological Forum 32, no. 3 (2017): 684–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12355.

Internet/Website:

GoBiz. “Ketentuan Penggunaan Gobiz.” https://gobiz.co.id/ketentuan-penggunaan-gobiz, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-02

How to Cite

Aprialdi, F., & Rahmad Efendi. (2025). Legal Responsibility of Online Transport Platforms for Merchant Losses Due to Fictitious Orders by Online Transportation Drivers Perspective of Consumer Protection Law. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 644–658. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.59224