Deliberately Missed Obligatory Prayers
Comparative Legal Perspectives of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah Scholars in Medan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v26i2.68976Keywords:
Qadha Prayer, Obligatory Prayer, Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, Islamic LawAbstract
This study examines and compares the legal perspectives of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and Muhammadiyah scholars in Medan regarding the obligation to make up (qadha) deliberately abandoned obligatory prayers. The issue remains debated due to differences in legal reasoning (istinbath al-hukm) and approaches to Islamic legal sources adopted by both organizations. While qadha prayers have been widely discussed in Islamic jurisprudence, comparative studies focusing on the institutional views of NU and Muhammadiyah at the local level remain limited. Using a normative-empirical legal approach and a qualitative comparative method, this study collected primary data through semi-structured interviews with two authoritative scholars representing NU and Muhammadiyah in Medan. Secondary data were obtained from the Qur’an, Hadith, classical and contemporary fiqh literature, and academic journals. Data were analyzed descriptively and comparatively, with source triangulation employed to ensure credibility. The findings reveal a fundamental difference between the two organizations. NU scholars maintain that deliberately missed obligatory prayers must be replaced through qadha, relying on the consensus of the majority of classical jurists (jumhur), ijma’, and qiyas aulawi. Conversely, Muhammadiyah scholars argue that qadha is not prescribed for intentionally abandoned prayers because no explicit textual evidence mandates it. Instead, they emphasize sincere repentance (taubat nasuha) and the performance of additional righteous deeds. This divergence stems from differing epistemological orientations: NU incorporates qiyas and classical madhhab traditions, whereas Muhammadiyah prioritizes direct textual interpretation and rejects qiyas in matters of ritual worship (ibadah mahdhah). The study highlights the dynamics of Islamic legal pluralism in Indonesia and provides practical insights for religious guidance concerning worship obligations within Muslim communities.
References
A’yun, Bilqis Qurroti, and Ida Rochmawati. “Muhammadiyah’s Concept Of Ijtihad On Hadith: A Case Study Of Friday Prayers For Women In The Tarjih Decision.” Urwatul Wutsqo: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman 14, no. 3 (2025): 1103–19. https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v14i3.2341.
Adiyes Putra, Popi, Sudirman Suparmin, and Tuti Anggraini. “Fatwa (Al-Ifta’); Signifikansi Dan Kedudukannya Dalam Hukum Islam.” Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan 19, no. 1 (2022): 27–38. https://doi.org/10.46781/al-mutharahah.v19i1.394.
Al-Ansi, Abdullah M., Tri Suyantiningsih, Muhammad Agung Wibowo, and Askar Garad. “The Islamic Organizations in Indonesia ‘Muhammadiyah and NU’: Social Perspective Explanation.” Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences 50, no. 5 (2023): 550–64. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i5.1124.
Al-Jauhari, Ismail bin Hammad. As-Shihhah Taj Al-Lughah Wa Shihah Al-‘Arabiyyah. Beirut: Dar Al-‘Ilm Lilmalayin, 1990.
Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.
Amrullah, and Hilma Fanniar Rohman. “Professional Zakat in the Perspective of Muhammadiyah and Persatuan Islam: A Comparative Analysis.” Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, Manajemen Dan Ekonomi Islam (JAM-EKIS) 8, no. 2 (2025): 1227–40. https://doi.org/10.36085/jamekis.v8i2.8434.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fiarinda Putri Syahrani, Sudirman Suparmin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





