Co-Payment in Health Insurance Claims

A Sharia Economic Law Perspective

Authors

  • Gozali Ilyas Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sumatera Utara
  • Cahaya Permata Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v26i2.70312

Keywords:

Co-payment, Asuransi Kesehatan, Tabarru’, ‘Adl, Hukum Ekonomi Syariah

Abstract

Co-payment in health insurance in Indonesia causes problems, insurance customers are required to make additional payments after premiums, making double payment and to the detriment of policyholders. Double payment charges the payment of hospital treatment payments of 3 million Rupiah for hospitalization, and 300 thousand Rupiah for outpatient treatment. Co-payment In sharia health insurance, this is regulated through OJK Circular Letter Number 7 of 2025, and gives rise to a legal dialectic between regulatory compliance and sharia compliance. This normative juridical research aims to analyze policy alignment co-payment with the principles of sharia economic law. Using the approach statute approach, and conceptual approach obtained through secondary data types such as laws, books, and previous research. The results of the study show that co-payment is inherently contrary to sharia. This policy cannot be justified through the perspective of sharia economic law to maintain sustainability Funds tabarru’. The critical point lies in its implementation. The provisions of transparency and proportionality in the OJK SE are actually the key to eliminating the principle of helping and the principle of enforcing justice ('adl). The conclusion of this study confirms that co-payment not in accordance with sharia because it is not in accordance with the principle of please help those who charge double payment to customers.

References

Al-Shatibi, Ibrahim ibn Musa. Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shari‘ah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2004.

Alya, Tengku Damara, and Annisa Sativa. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Penerapan Prinsip Transparansi Dalam Pemasaran Produk Asuransi:(Studi Kasus Pada PT. Generali Medan).” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 6, no. 4 (2025). https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1604.

Al-Zuhayli, Wahbah. “Fiqh Islam Wa Adillatuhu.” Jilid ke-7. Dimashq: Dar al-Fikr, 2004.

Bank Indonesia. Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Fatwa Syariah dalam Sistem Keuangan Indonesia. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia, 2018.

DSN-MUI. Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia Nomor 21/DSN-MUI/X/2001 tentang Pedoman Umum Asuransi Syariah. Jakarta: Dewan Syariah Nasional–Majelis Ulama Indonesia, 2001.

Hidayat Rahmad. (2022). Fiqh Muamalah CV Publisher. Stuart Scott. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/14311/1/Rahmat%20Hidayat%2C%20Fikih%20Muamalah.pdf

Kesuma, M R, E D O Irianto, M Henrika, L D Ariswati, R N Aini, and C M Widaryo. “Unveiling Sentiment and Financial Risks: OJK’s 10% Co-Payment in Health Insurance.” RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business 4, no. 2 (2025): 3150–59. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.997.

Kurniawan, C, and A Hergastyasmawan. “Conformity of the Co-Payment Scheme of OJK Circular Letter No. 7/2025 with the Ta’awuni Principle in Sharia Insurance: A Critical Evaluation from the Perspective of Maqashid Syariah.” International Journal of Advanced Technology and Social Sciences 3, no. 6 (2025): 867–78. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijatss.v3i6.41.

McConville, Mike. Research Methods for Law. Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

Nugroho, Robert Wijaya. “Janji Suci Yang Terkoyak Oleh Pihak Ketiga: Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Intervensi Polis Asuransi Kesehatan Berbasis Co-Payment Oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Ojk) Ditinjau Dari Teori Kepastian Hukum.” SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan 4, no. 11 (2025): 3751–68. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v4i11.3661.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 7 Tahun 2025 tentang Penyelenggaraan Produk Asuransi Kesehatan. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2025.

Permata, C., Lubis, F., & Harahap, M. Y. (2026). Construction of Online Dispute Resolution Regulations in E-Commerce Dispute Resolution. In Journal of Science and Social Research (Number 1). http://jurnal.goretanpena.com/index.php/JSSR

Siregar, Hotma Sari, and Fatimah Zahara. “Settlement of Remaining Financing Due to Rejected Insurance Claims from the Perspective of POJK Number 69/POJK.05/2016 (Case Study at BPRS Puduarta Insani Medan).” AL-IKTISAB: Journal of Islamic Economic Law 8, no. 2 (November 19, 2024): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.21111/aliktisab.v8i2.13021.

Syariah, Pusat Pengkajian Hukum Ekonomi. Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Prenada Media, 2019.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 337.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 42.

Zamzam Mubarok, and Amrizal. “Analisis Iuran Dan Kamar Rawat Inap Standar Di Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan Dalam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah.” Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah 6, no. 7 (July 1, 2024). https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v6i7.3234.

Zulham, & Rokan, M. K. (2022). The Theory of Sharia Economic Law in Indonesia is ok.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

Ilyas, G., & Permata, C. (2026). Co-Payment in Health Insurance Claims: A Sharia Economic Law Perspective . Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 2497–2507. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v26i2.70312

Issue

Section

Artikel