Criminal Liability for Methamphetamine Purchase and Possession through Conspiracy
A Case Study of Decision No. 916/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Tjk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.v26i2.71067Keywords:
Criminal Liability, Criminal Conspiracy, Methamphetamine, Narcotics CrimeAbstract
Conspiracy to commit narcotics offenses constitutes a serious criminal act under Indonesian law because it involves an agreement between two or more individuals to commit crimes related to the possession, purchase, distribution, or control of narcotics. This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to the criminal conspiracy to purchase and possess methamphetamine and to examine the criminal liability imposed on offenders based on Decision Number 916/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Tjk. The research employed a normative-empirical legal approach by combining statutory and doctrinal analysis with empirical data obtained through interviews with investigators from the Lampung Regional Police Narcotics Directorate, public prosecutors at the Bandar Lampung District Attorney’s Office, and judges of the Tanjung Karang District Court. Secondary data were collected through library research involving legislation, legal literature, and relevant judicial decisions, while qualitative juridical analysis was applied to interpret the findings. The results indicate that the commission of the offense was influenced by several interrelated factors, including criminal intent, economic hardship, low educational attainment, and inadequate moral and religious values, which collectively encouraged the offender’s involvement in narcotics-related criminal activities. Furthermore, the court determined that the defendant fulfilled the legal requirements for criminal responsibility, including criminal capacity, culpability, and the absence of grounds for excuse or justification. Consequently, the defendant was convicted under Article 112 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics and sentenced to five years of imprisonment and a fine of IDR 800,000,000, with a substitute imprisonment of three months in the event of non-payment. The findings demonstrate that criminal liability for narcotics conspiracy is imposed based on the fulfillment of both substantive criminal law elements and evidentiary standards established during judicial proceedings.
References
Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634
Garland, D. (2020). Penal controls and social controls: Toward a theory of American penal exceptionalism. Punishment & Society, 22(3), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474519881992
Hasibuan, I., Japri, M., & Ratnasari, D. (2025). Juridical Analysis of the Evidentiary Practice in Criminal Conspiracy in Narcotics Cases. JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.56371/jirpl.v6i3.454
Irvita, M., & Asriani, A. (2025). Transparency and accountability in the justice system: Building public trust and justice. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(4), 26–40. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i4.367
Kotlán, P., Ondrúš, M., Kozlová, A., Kotlán, I., Petr, P., & Kalabis, R. (2023). Criminal Compliance Program as a Tool for Criminal Liability Exculpation of Legal Persons in the Czech Republic. Laws, 12(2), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws12020020
Maculan, E., & Gil Gil, A. (2020). The Rationale and Purposes of Criminal Law and Punishment in Transitional Contexts. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(1), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqz033
Mousourakis, G. (2018). Harm, Culpability and Criminal Liability: A Study of Justification and Excuse in Common Law Jurisprudence. In Law and Forensic Science (Vol. 15, Number 1).
Nahak, S. (2020). The Liability of Criminal Law towards a Notary Official in the Crime of Embezzlement at the Denpasar District Court. Jurnal Notariil, 5(1), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.5.2.2572.107-117
Pambudi, P., & Redi, A. (2024). Criminal Law Politics and Reform to Strengthen Law Enforcement Roles in Indonesia in Combatting Narcotics Crimes. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 3(3), 660–672. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v3i3.473
Ragolane, M., & Khoza, N. G. (2024). Challenges faced by the government in addressing organised crime in South Africa: a policy framework analysis. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), 6(3), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v6i3.510
Volkov, K. A., Agildin, V. V., & Seitkhozhin, B. U. (2021). Importance of the principles of criminal law in the classification of crimes. SHS Web of Conferences, 108, 02007. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110802007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 S. Endang Prasetyawati, I Ketut Seregig, Gito Rolis, Ilham Baruna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





