Cyberbullying in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy

Considering the Dignity of Victims and Freedom of Expression after the Enactment of the National Criminal Code

Authors

  • Viola Aureta Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Abelleni Halim Universitas Tarumanagara
  • Nikita Clarissa Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.72958

Keywords:

Cyberbullying, Perundungan Siber, Filsafat Hukum, Kepastian Hukum, Perlindungan Korban, KUHP Nasional

Abstract

Cyberbullying or cyberbullying includes a wide variety of acts, ranging from repeated taunts, accusations that damage reputation, threats, to the dissemination of personal data, so that one social label can touch different legal interests. The problem becomes more complicated after the National Criminal Code takes effect on January 2, 2026, because Article 27A of the ITE Law is limited in its applicability by the transitional provisions of Law Number 1 of 2024. This study aims to map the position of  forms of cyberbullying in Indonesian criminal law after that date and formulate a legal philosophical framework to assess the legal response to it. The research uses normative juridical methods with legislative and conceptual approaches, as well as grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretations. The results show, first, that cyberbullying does not have a single criminal basis. The explanation of Article 29 of the ITE Law does mention bullying in the digital space, but only in the scope of threats sent directly to the victim, while attacks on honor carried out after January 2, 2026 are more appropriately read through Article 433 and Article 441 of the National Criminal Code. Second, this article proposes a layered test model that combines dignity as a social position (Waldron), the priority of basic freedom and self-esteem (Rawls), the requirements for criminal eligibility (Bentham), and legal certainty (Fuller and Radbruch). This model results in the principle that freedom of expression can only be limited if expression attacks a person's position as a fellow citizen, not just offending him, and that criminal punishment is only appropriate when non-criminal means are inadequate.

References

Books:

Bentham, Jeremy. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne, 1789.

Braithwaite, John. Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

Citron, Danielle Keats. Hate Crimes in Cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.

Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. Revised Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.

Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. London: John W. Parker and Son, 1859.

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Waldron, Jeremy. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.

Legislation:

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengesahan International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Kovenan Internasional tentang Hak-Hak Sipil dan Politik).

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.

Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual.

Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2026 tentang Penyesuaian Pidana.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 17 Tahun 2025 tentang Tata Kelola Penyelenggaraan Sistem Elektronik dalam Pelindungan Anak.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Ikhtisar Putusan Perkara Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024.

Internasional instrument:

Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 34, Article 19: Freedoms of Opinion and Expression. CCPR/C/GC/34, 12 September 2011.

Journals:

Adnan, Alinda Julietha, Dewi Putriyani, Hycal Asmara Wibowo, dan Suta Ramadan. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Cyberbullying.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 5, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i1.20935.

Chakan, Arron, dan Muhammad Fauzan Millenio. “Protection of Cyberbullying Victims in Indonesia (An Overview of Law and Victimology).” Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review 3, no. 1 (2023): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/lsr.v3i1.53757.

Hikmawati, P. “Regulasi Cyberbullying dan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korbannya.” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 15, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v15i1.4383.

Klonick, Kate. “The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech.” Harvard Law Review 131, no. 6 (2018): 1598–1670.

Kowalski, Robin M., Gary W. Giumetti, Amber N. Schroeder, dan Micah R. Lattanner. “Bullying in the Digital Age: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Cyberbullying Research among Youth.” Psychological Bulletin 140, no. 4 (2014): 1073–1137.

Maipauw, Charlly Richarth Everth, Subekti, dan Vallencia Nandya Paramitha. “Daya Laku Pasal 27A Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik setelah Berlakunya KUHP Nasional.” Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 10, no. S1 (2026): 452–471. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v10iS1.12709.

Radbruch, Gustav. “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946).” Diterjemahkan oleh Bonnie Litschewski Paulson dan Stanley L. Paulson. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, no. 1 (2006): 1–11.

Regita, Dhea Ayu, dan Yeni Widowaty. “Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Perundungan melalui Media Sosial.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 5, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v5i2.19281.

Salsabila, Z., dan A. L. Ibrahim. “Hak untuk Dilupakan sebagai Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum Korban Cyberbullying (Studi Komparatif Indonesia dengan Korea Selatan).” Kertha Patrika 45, no. 2 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i02.p03.

Sitihastuti, Sholikah, dan Solikhah Solikhah. “The Urgency of Legal Protection for Victims of Cyberbullying in Indonesia.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 15, no. 1 (2024): 61–68. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v15i1.12025.

Smith, Peter K., Jess Mahdavi, Manuel Carvalho, Sonja Fisher, Shanette Russell, dan Neil Tippett. “Cyberbullying: Its Nature and Impact in Secondary School Pupils.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49, no. 4 (2008): 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x.

Tokunaga, Robert S. “Following You Home from School: A Critical Review and Synthesis of Research on Cyberbullying Victimization.” Computers in Human Behavior 26, no. 3 (2010): 277–287.

Zhu, Chengyan, Shiqing Huang, Richard Evans, dan Wei Zhang. “Cyberbullying among Adolescents and Children: A Comprehensive Review of the Global Situation, Risk Factors, and Preventive Measures.” Frontiers in Public Health 9 (2021): 634909. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

How to Cite

Aureta, V., Abelleni Halim, & Nikita Clarissa. (2026). Cyberbullying in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy: Considering the Dignity of Victims and Freedom of Expression after the Enactment of the National Criminal Code. Al-Risalah Jurnal Ilmu Syariah Dan Hukum, 3266–3284. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.72958

Issue

Section

Artikel