Kerangka Konseptual Model Pembelajaran Real Math Literacy (RML)

Authors

  • Andi Dian Angriani Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Alimuddin Tampa Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v7i2.58454

Keywords:

conceptual framework, learning model, Real Math Literacy (RML)

Abstract

One of the most important competencies in the 21st century is mathematical literacy. However, the importance of mathematical literacy has not been in line with the achievements of Indonesian students, who are still relatively low. One of the reasons is that the learning model used to manage activities in the classroom has not been maximized. The writing of this article provides an overview of the development of Real Math Literacy (RML) learning model components consisting of syntax, social system, reaction principles, support system, instructional impact, and accompanying impact. Real Math Literacy (RML) learning model designed is the result of analysis, elaboration, and synthesis of relevant learning theories, the main components underlying mathematical literacy, the discovery learning model, and assessment for learning. Real Math Literacy (RML) learning model is expected to be a practical alternative for educators in designing learning processes that can improve students' mathematical literacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aisyah, N., Hawa, S., Somakim, Purwoko, Hartono, Y., & AS, M. (2007). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Matematika SD. Jakarta: Dirjen Dikti Depdiknas.

Alimuddin. T., Layly, S., Helmi, Alimuddin, N. F. (2022). The students' numerical literacy ability in junior high schools. Kreano jurnal matematika kreatif-inovatif, 13(2), 269-282. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v13i2.37541.

Amir, Z., & Risnawati. (2015). Psikologi pembelajaran matematika. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Presindo.

Babys, U. (2016). Kemampuan Literasi matematis space and shape dan kemandirian siswa SMA pada discovery learning berpendekatan RME-PISA. Jurnal Pendididikan Matematika Indonesia, 1(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v1i2.82.

Desyandri, Muhammadi, Mansurdin, M., & Fahmi, R. (2019). Development of integrated thematic teaching material used discovery learning model in grade V elementary school. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 7(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.29210/129400.

Dunne, C. (2011). The place of the literature review in grounded theory research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.494930.

Fauzan, A. (2002). Applying Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) in teaching geometry in indonesian primary school. [PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation external, University of Twente]. University of Twente.

Gómez-Chacón, L., Molina, E., & Sánchez, M. A. (2017). Mathematics literacy in the real world. Enseñanza de las ciencias: revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 35(1), 39-57.

Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: Freudenthal Istitute.

Hobri. (2009). Model-model pembelajaran inovatif. Jember: Center for Society Studies.

Ibda, F. (2015). Perkembangan kognitif: teori Jean Piageat. Intelektualita, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/ji.v3i1.197

Irianto, P.O., & Febrianti, L.Y. (2017). Pentingnya penguasaan literasi bagi generasi muda dalam menghadapi MEA. Proceedings Education and Language International Conference, 1(1), 640-647.

Johar, R., & Zainabar. (2019). Student’s Performance on Shape and Space Task of PISA Question. Proceeding International Conference On Education, 449–454.

Kelana, J. B., Wardani, D. S., Firdaus, A. R., Altaftazani, D. H., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2020). The effect of STEM approach on the mathematics literacy ability of elementary school teacher education students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1657. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1657/1/012006

Kusuma, D., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Wardono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). The characteristics of mathematical literacy based on students’ executive function. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujer.11.1.193.

Lailiyah, S. (2017). Mathematical literacy skills of students’ in term of gender differences. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995146.

Lestari, D. (2014). Penerapan teori bruner untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran simetri lipat di kelas IV SDN 02 Makmur Jaya kabupaten Mamuju Utara. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako, 3(2), 129–141.

Mahdiansyah, & Rahmawati. (2014). Literasi matematika siswa pendidikan menengah: analisis menggunakan desain tes internasional dengan konteks indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v20i4.158

Nurhidayati, E. (2017). Pedagogi konstruktivisme dalam praksis pendidikan Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Educational Counseling, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30653/001.201711.2

Oktaviana, Y. I., & Rosyidi, A. H. (2019). Kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal PISA kategori formulate pada siswa kelas VIII. MATHEdunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v8n2.p400-407

Pangemanan, A. (2020). Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach on Statistics Material Against Student Results. International Education Studies, 13(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n4p1

Rahayu, D. U., Mulyono, & Cahyono, A. N. (2019). Kemampuan literasi matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa pada model PBL Berbantuan LMS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES.

Rangkuti, A. N. (2014). Konstruktivisme dan pembelajaran matematika. Darul Ilmi, 02(02), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.24952/di.v2i2.416

Ratumanan, T. G. (2004). Belajara dan pembelajaran. Semarang: Unesa University Press.

Sari, R.H.N. (2015). Literasi Matematika: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana?. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, UNY (pp. 713-720).

Seuring, S., Yawar, S. A., Land, A., Khalid, R. U., & Sauer, P. C. (2020). The application of theory in literature reviews – illustrated with examples from supply chain management. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2020-0247.

Shiel, G., Perkins, R, Close, S, & Oldham, E. (2007). PISA mathematics: a teacher's guide. Stationery Office, Dublin.

Simamora, A. B., Widodo, W., & Sanjaya, I. G. M. (2020). Innovative learning model: improving the students' scientific literacy of junior high school. Jorer: International Journal of Recent Educational Education, 1(3). 271-285. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i3.55.

Torraco, R. J. (2004). Challenges and choices for theoretical research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1097.

Tsiotsou, R. H., Koles, B., Paul, J., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2022). Theory generation from literature reviews: A methodological guidance. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1505–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12861.

Uno, H. B., & Satria, K. (2012). Assessement Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Westbroek, H. B., Rens, L. V., Berg, E. V. D., & F., J. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1744044.

Wijaya, A., Hauvel-Panhuizen, M. Van Den, & Doorman, M. (2015). Identifying ways to improve student performance on context-based mathematics tasks. CERME 9 - NinthCongress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, 944–950.

Published

2025-07-04

How to Cite

Angriani, A. D., & Tampa, A. (2025). Kerangka Konseptual Model Pembelajaran Real Math Literacy (RML). Al Asma : Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 196–207. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v7i2.58454

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.