Analisis Buku Ajar Matematika: Kesalahan Penyajian Tingkat Kognitif Soal berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi

Authors

  • A. Sriyanti Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Mardianti Mardianti Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Nursalam Nursalam Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Munirah Munirah Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v7i2.60630

Keywords:

cognitive levels of exercises, revised Bloom’s taxonomy, types of errors in material presentation

Abstract

Learning materials and exercises in mathematics textbooks play a crucial role, where the materials develop students’ knowledge, while the exercises serve as evaluation tools to measure their understanding. This study aims to identify errors in the presentation of materials based on four mathematical objects and to analyze the cognitive levels of exercises in the topic of Linear Equations from the Grade VIII SMP/MTs mathematics textbook, Curriculum 2013 revision 2017 published by the Ministry of Education and Culture. The research employed a qualitative descriptive method with documentation techniques. The subjects consisted of the materials and exercises from the selected topic, while data analysis was carried out through data reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed one factual error and five operational errors, while no conceptual or principle errors were found. The cognitive levels of the exercises were fairly varied, covering LOTS, MOTS, and HOTS. Specifically, there were 3 items at the remembering level (C1/LOTS), 55 at understanding (C2), 23 at applying (C3/MOTS), and 3 at analyzing (C4/HOTS). However, items at the evaluating (C5) and creating (C6) levels were not present. Overall, the exercises were sufficiently varied but unevenly distributed, with a limited number of higher-order thinking items. The implication of this study highlights the need for continuous improvement of mathematics textbooks to ensure more accurate content, a balanced distribution of cognitive levels, and the enhancement of mathematics learning quality as well as overall educational standards in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2015). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan asesmen (A. Prihantoro (ed.); 1 ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

As’ari, A. R., Tohir, M., Valentino, E., Imron, Z., & Ibnu Taufiq. (2020). Matematika (Cet. 5). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Bramasti, R. (2012). Kamus matematika (E. Sujatmiko (ed.)). Surakarta: Aksarra Sinergi Media.

Cahyani, C. A., & Sutriyono. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pada materi operasi penjumlahan dan pengurangan bentuk aljabar bagi siswa kelas VII SMP Kristen 2 Salatiga. JTAM | Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika, 2(1), 26–30. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v2i1.257

Cahyono, B., & Adilah, N. (2016). Analisis soal dalam buku siswa matematika kurikulum 2013 kelas VIII semester I berdasarkan dimensi kognitif dari TIMSS. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2016.1.1.86-98

Effendi, R. (2017). Konsep revisi taksonomi bloom dan implementasinya pada pelajaran matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 72–28. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v2i1.1483

Hadar, L. L. (2017). Opportunities to learn: mathematics textbooks and students’ achievements. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 55(7), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.10.002

Helmawati. (2019). Pembelajaran dan penilaian berbasis HOTS (P. Latifah (ed.); 1 ed.). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Maemunah, S. (2019). Analisis buku teks siswa SMP kelas VIII pokok bahasan teorema pythagoras ditinjau dari taksonomi bloom. Prosiding Sesiomadika, 2(4), 903–922.

Mahendra, I. W. E., Pamithi, N. N., Hermawan, E., Juwana, D. P., & Gunartha, I. W. (2020). Teachers’ formative assessment: accessing students’ high order thinking skills (hots). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 12(12), 180–202.

Narwanti, S. (2015). Panduan menyusun silabus dan rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran [konsep kompetensi] (Qoni (ed.)). Yogyakarta: Familia.

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2015). Mengenal matematika lebih dekat (1 ed.). Yogyakarta: Matematika.

Purnomo, E. (2016). Dasar-dasar dan perancangan evaluasi pembelajaran (1 ed.). Yogyakarta: Media Akademi.

Putrawangsa, S. (2017). Desain pembelajaran matematika realistik (U. Hasanah (ed.); 1 ed.). Mataram: CV. Reka Karya Amerta.

Rohim, A. (2020). Analisis kesalahan buku matematika materi relasi dan fungsi kelas VIII serta alternatif penyelesaiannya. Jurnal Edukasi, 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51836/je.v6i2.153

Ruwaida, H. (2019). Proses kognitif dalam taksonomi bloom revisi : analisis kemampuan mencipta (C6) pada pembelajaran fikih di MI Miftahul Anwar desa banua lawas. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.35931/am.v4i1.168

Sari, D. P. (2016). Analisis kesalahan buku teks matematika SMP/MTS kelas VII berdasarkan objek kajian matematika. Prosiding Seminar Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, November, 77–87.

Sari, D. P. (2017). Analisis kesalahan buku siswa matematika kelas VII SMP/MTs semester I kurikulum 2013 berdasarkan objek kajian matematika dan alternatif perbaikannya. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajaran II (KNPMP II), Maret, 263–274.

Setiawan, D. F. (2018). Prosedur evaluasi dalam pembelajaran (1 ed.). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif (Sutopo (ed.); Cet. 3). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumardyono. (2004). Karakteristik matematika dan implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran matematika. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Syarifah, L. L., Yenni, Y., & Dewi, W. K. (2020). Analisis soal-soal pada buku ajar matematika siswa kelas XI ditinjau dari aspek kognitif. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 04(02), 1259–1272. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.335

Valentino, E. (2017). Analisis kesalahan konten matematika pada buku siswa tematik sekolah dasar kelas V semester I kurikulum 2013. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 74–82.

Widana, I. W. (2017). Modul penyusunan soal higher order thingking skill (HOTS). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Published

2025-10-10

How to Cite

Sriyanti, A., Mardianti, M., Nursalam, N., & Munirah, M. (2025). Analisis Buku Ajar Matematika: Kesalahan Penyajian Tingkat Kognitif Soal berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Al Asma : Journal of Islamic Education, 7(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.24252/asma.v7i2.60630

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>