Analisis Perbandingan Mazhab tentang Pelaksanaan Mediasi dengan Media Telekonferensi

Authors

  • Nurul Aulia Dewi Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar
  • Abdul Halim Talli Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i2.17818

Abstract

This article seeks to present a comparison of mediation with teleconference media, both within the PERMA and the scholars of the sect. Mediation is an attempt to resolve conflicts by engaging neutral mediators who do not have the authority to make decisions that help the parties in dispute to reach a resolution or solution accepted by both parties. The multidisciplinary approach used in this article is a juridical, sociological, theological-normative and managerial approach. This article is library research, a study by writing, clarifying, and making data obtained from various written sources. The method of data collection is to use document techniques (library studies). Quoting and analyzing data with document techniques is intended to collect related data contained in documents in the form of books, journals, and research results in the form of thesis, thesis, and dissertation. The results found that the most notable differences regarding the limits of mediation with teleconference media were found in the dissent of the Sect scholars. The Shafi and Hanbali sects argue that the ideal age in marriage is 15 years, while Abu Hanfah argues that the age of maturity comes at 19 years of age for women and 17 years for men, as is the case with Imam Malik arguing that the ideal age of manhood is 18 years for both men and women. The differences between the Imams of the Sect are influenced by the environment and culture in which they live. However, in Islamic law itself there is never a very firm limit, but the most basic thing about the age limit of marriage is that it is already in place

References

Abdul Halim Talli. (2008). Mediasi dalam PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2008. Makassar. http://journal.uinalauddin.ac.id/index.php/alqadau/article/download/2635/2486 (diakses 2 Januari 2020).

Dahlan, Bintang Sanusi. (2000). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Echols, John M., & Shadily, Hasan. (2003). Kamus Inggris Indonesia (Cet. XXV). Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Hasabi, M. (1984). Peradilan dan Hukum Acara Islam. Jakarta: PT Al Maarif.

Hidayat, Maskur. (2016). Strategi dan Taktik Mediasi Berdasarkan PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Kementerian Agama RI. (2010). Al-Quran dan Terjemahnya. Jakarta: CV Penerbit Diponegoro.

Muhammad Ali al Sabuni. Rawai al Bayan Tafsir Ayat al Ahkam Min al Quran. Jakarta: Dar al Islamiyyah.

Muhammad Ali al Sabuni. Rawai al Bayan Tafsir Ayat al Ahkam Min al Quran.

Muhammad bin Ahmad al Anshari al Qurthubi. (1967). Ahkam al Quran. Mesir: Dar al Kitab al Arabi.

Naro, Wahyuddin, Abdul Syatar, Muhammad Majdy Amiruddin, Islamul Haq, Achmad Abubakar, & Chaerul Risal. (2020). Shariah assessment toward the prosecution of cybercrime in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 572–586. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.5

Rahmadi, Takdir. (2011). Mediasi Penyelesaian Sengketa melalui Pendekatan Mufakat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Soekanto, Soerjono. (2007). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Soemartono, Gatot. (2006). Arbitrase dan Mediasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Syatar, Abdul, & Abubakar, Achmad. (2020). Filosofi Uqubah Islamiyah Versi Ramadhan Al-Buti: Relevansi dengan Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Gowa: Alauddin University Press.

Tim Penyusun Kamus Pusat Bahasa. (2002). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ketiga (Cet. II). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-17

How to Cite

Dewi, N. A., & Talli, A. H. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Mazhab tentang Pelaksanaan Mediasi dengan Media Telekonferensi. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 2(2), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.v2i2.17818

Issue

Section

Articles