Controversy Over Sunrang
Analyzing Post-Divorce Ownership in the Context of Makassar Custom and Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.39933Keywords:
Sunrang, Islamic Law, Bugis-Makassar Customary Law, Divorce, Post-Divorce OwnershipAbstract
This study aimed to analyze the use of sunrang after divorce in Maradekaya Village, Bajeng District, Gowa Regency, from the perspective of Islamic law. The study explored sunrang, often considered similar to mahar (dowry), and the perspective within the context of Bugis-Makassar local culture, where customary law interacts with Islamic legal principles. A descriptive-qualitative design was adopted with a socio-legal method, then primary data was collected through interviews and direct observation. Meanwhile, secondary data was collected from literature and document studies. Data analysis was carried out descriptively and juridically to identify key patterns and themes related to the use of sunrang. The result showed that although sunrang is often treated similarly to mahar in Makassar customs in Maradekaya Village, Bajeng District, Gowa Regency, ownership and return of sunrang after divorce were more influenced by customary law. This result showed that the Makassar community tended to uphold local traditions, suggesting that sunrang remains the property of the wife, despite discrepancies with the stricter principles of Islamic law. This study contributes new insights by combining Islamic and customary law perspectives in analyzing the use of sunrang post-divorce. There was also an understanding of how these two legal systems can influence each other within a strong local cultural context. The implications are significant for the development of clearer legal guidelines regarding ownership of sunrang in both Islamic and customary law. Furthermore, this study showed the need for a more holistic method of resolving sunrang disputes, accommodating both customary norms and Islamic legal principles to maintain social cohesion in the indigenous community of Makassar.
References
Abd Wakil, M. N., & Ahmad, C. M. (2017). The Historical Impact on the Valuation of Dowry (Mahr) Rate: Pre and Post-Colonial Eras in Johor. Ulum Islamiyyah, 22(SE-Articles), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol22no0.4
Al-Sharmani, M. (2018). Marriage in Islamic Interpretive Tradition: Revisiting the Legal and the Ethical. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 2(1–2), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340017
Alimi, M. Y. (2014). Islam as Drama: Wedding Rites and the Theatricality of Islam in South Sulawesi. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 15(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2014.915875
Anitha, S., Yalamarty, H., & Roy, A. (2018). Changing Nature and Emerging Patterns of Domestic Violence in Global Contexts: Dowry Abuse and the Transnational Abandonment of Wives in India. Women’s Studies International Forum, 69, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2018.05.005
Aprido, R., & Fatimah, F. (2023). The Resolution of Customary Community Land Rights Issues Based on Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021 and its Relevance to the Constitution in Indonesia. Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202323279
Asmuni, A. (2024). Compensation to Ex-Wives for Domestic Violence in Indonesia. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.32505/QADHA.V11I2.9537
Avita, N., Idris, A. R., & Oktalita, F. (2022). Integration of Tradition and Sharia: Dowry and Dui Menre in the Marriage of the Bugis Community in Bone Regency. El-Mashlahah, 12(2), 124–138. https://doi.org/10.23971/elma.v12i2.4712
Azahari, R., Zakaria, Z., Rahman, A. A., & Muh Ali, H. (2019). Does the Dower Equate to Economic Security for Muslim Women in Malaysia? In Economic Empowerment of Women in the Islamic World (Vol. 1, pp. 445–468). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811212154_0021
Benda-Beckmann, K. von, & Turner, B. (2018). Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674
Blackham, A., Blackham, C. A., & Law School, M. (2022). When Law and Data Collide: The Methodological Challenge of Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Law. Journal of Law and Society, 49(S1), S87–S104. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOLS.12373
Busyro, B., Burhanuddin, N., Muassomah, M., Saka, P. A., & Wafa, M. A. (2023). The Reinforcement of the “Dowry for Groom” Tradition in Customary Marriages of West Sumatra’s Pariaman Society. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V7I1.15872
Butkute, L., Mortelmans, D., & Sondaite, J. (2023). Entangled in the Web of Conflicts: Prolonged Divorce from the Divorcees’ Perspective. European Journal of Psychology Open, 82(4), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/A000042
Chankrajang, T., & Vechbanyongratana, J. (2021). Land, Ladies, and the Law: A Case Study on Women’s Land Rights and Welfare in Southeast Asia in the Nineteenth Century. The Economic History Review, 74(1), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12999
Daniela, N. P., Hanapi, A., Husnul, M., & Fahri, M. (2024). The Granting of Family Card for Siri Marriage in Banda City: Perspective of Islamic Family Law. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(1), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.23317
Dawood, S. (2024). Married Women Property Rights under Muslim Marriage and Divorce Act of Sri Lanka: A Critical Analysis. ATSK Journal of Law, 1(1), 33–41.
Diala, A. C. (2017). The Concept of Living Customary Law: A Critique. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 49(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1331301
Duderija, A. (2016). The Custom (‘Urf) Based Assumptions Regarding Gender Roles and Norms in the Islamic Tradition: A Critical Examination. Studies in Religion, 45(4), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008429815596549
Ezer, T. (2016). Forging a Path for Women’s Rights in Customary Law. UC Law SF Journal on Gender and Justice, 27(1), 68–85.
Fatima, S. (2023). Employability of a Research Method and Methodology in a Socio-Legal Study. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(I), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.31703/GSSR.2023(VIII-I).31
Grijns, M., & Horii, H. (2018). Child Marriage in a Village in West Java (Indonesia): Compromises between Legal Obligations and Religious Concerns. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 5(2), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2018.9
Hairuddin K., Iskandar, A. M., & Harifuddin, H. (2024). The Honor of Women and Belis in Manggarai Traditional Marriage Customs. Society, 12(2), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v12i2.339
Hartono, R., & Lestari, A. (2022). The Influence of Modernization on the Implementation of Passampo Siri’ in Bugis Marriages in East Kolaka: Sociological Perspective of Islamic Law. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 5(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.35719/ijil.v5i1.2012Ismael, A. G. (2024). Examining Inequities in the Administration of Dowry for Yakan Marriages: A Case Study Approach. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 2228–2237. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.00160
Jamaa, L. (2018). Fatwas of the Indonesian Council of Ulama and Its Contributions to the Development of Contemporary Islamic Law in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 8(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.18326/IJIMS.V8I1.29-56
Jaraba, M. (2020). Khul' in Action: How Do Local Muslim Communities in Germany Dissolve an Islamic Religious-Only Marriage? Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 40(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2020.1737414
Jenkins, K. (2016). Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman. Ethics, 126(2), 394–421. https://doi.org/10.1086/683535
Jotam Kalalo, J. J., Betaubun, P., & Novita Kalalo, C. (2019). Implementation of Marriage by Indigenous Law to Yei Tribe Communities. International Journal of Management, 10(6), 45–53.
Karimullah, S. S. (2022). Pursuing Legal Harmony: Indonesianization of Islamic Law Concept and Its Impact on National Law. Mazahib, 21(2), 213–244. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i2.4800
Khan, I., Abdullah, M. F., Rahman, N. N. A., Nor, M. R. B. M., & Yusoff, M. Y. Z. B. M. (2016). The Right of Women in Property Sharing in Bangladesh: Can the Islamic Inheritance System Eliminate Discrimination? SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1695. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3347-2
Kusmayanti, H., Rachmainy, L., & Mulyanto, D. (2021). Settlement of Customary Inheritance Dispute Cases According to Sharia (Islamic Law) in Indigenous Communities in Indonesia. NVEO - Natural Volatiles & Essential Oils Journal, 8(6), 807–818.
Laksana, D. P., Rato, D., & Zulaikha, E. (2020). The Cost of Panai as the Marriage Requirement for the Migrant Bugis Tribe under Adat Law. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 1(1), 57–74.
Latupono, B. (2024). Transformation of Marriage Dowry into Shares in a Limited Liability Company: A Review of Civil Law and Its Implications. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(3), 877–884.
Lon, Y. S., & Widyawati, F. (2021). Customary Law Before Religion and State Laws Regarding Marriage in Manggarai, Eastern Indonesia. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 9(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.15408/JCH.V9I1.16510
Lowe, P., & Rowlands, S. (2022). Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Targeting Those Judged to Be Unfit for Parenthood in the United States and the United Kingdom. Global Public Health, 17(12), 3773–3784. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2022.2048408
Maani, B., Syukri, & Aliyas. (2024). Consequences of Panai Money in Siri and Value of Maqasid al-Shariah in Tribe Marriage Bugis in Indragiri Hilir Riau. In Religion, Education, Science and Technology Towards a More Inclusive and Sustainable Future (pp. 218–222). Routledge.
Maloko, M. T., Indiyanto, A., Fernando, H., & Larasati, Y. G. (2024). Sompa Tanah in Makassar Bugis Customary Marriages: Legal, Religious, and Cultural Perspectives. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 1213–1236. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i3.1309
Mansur, Ikhsan, M., Diab, A. L., Nurfaidah, S., & Darlis, S. (2024). The Return of Doi Menre Bada Duhul in Bugis Marriage Law, South Konawe: Islamic Education and Sociology of Islamic Law Perspective. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(2), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.22373/UJHK.V7I2.25574
Miqat, N., & Bakhtiar, H. S. (2017). Harmonization of Uang Panaik as Customary Term in Bugis-Makassar Ethnic Group and Dowry in Indonesian Marriage System. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 67, 41–46.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical Guidance to Qualitative Research. Part 3: Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091
Mustopa, M. (2024). Qira’at Diversity in Islamic Family Law Verses: Implications for Indonesian Marriage Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 1257–1279. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V8I2.23513
Nafisah, D., Nasrudin, N., Meidina, A. R., & Zain, M. F. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Islamic Family Law and Normative Law: Examining the Causes of Divorce in Purwokerto, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 8(2), 847–871. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V8I2.16825
Nasir, M. A. (2016). Islamic Law and Paradox of Domination and Resistance: Women’s Judicial Divorce in Lombok, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 44(1–2), 78–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04401006
Nasution, M. I. H., & Iwan, I. (2024). Judge’s Rejection of Compensation for the Management of Dowry Disputes. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 7(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.30659/JDH.V7I2.38773
Nawaz, S., Shabbir, M. S., Shaheen, K., & Koser, M. (2021). The Role of Human Rights and Obligations toward Cross Gender Empowerment under Islamic Laws. IRASD Journal of Management, 3(3), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.52131/jom.2021.0303.0039
Pandang, I., Rahman, A., Halimang, S., & Mahrudin. (2018). Delayed Mahar: The Perspective of Islamic and Customary Law. IOP Conference Series, 175(1), 121–140.
Purnomo, A., Salam, N., Zamzami, M., & Bakar, A. (2023). Dimensions of Maqasid al-Shariah and Human Rights in the Constitutional Court’s Decision on Marriage Age Difference in Indonesia. Samarah, 7(3), 1397–1421. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V7I3.13283
Risyat, A., Muliani, R., & Redhani, M. E. (2022). Constitutional Jurisdiction Review of the Existence of Indigenous Law Communities in Indonesia. Constitutional Law Society, 1(1), 25–40.
Ritonga, B., Mukhlas, O. S., Nurrohman, Burhanuddin, & Ridwan, A. H. (2024). Islamic Family Law Reform in Indonesia. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(2), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.32505/QADHA.V11I2.9667
Rohman, A. N. (2022). Shifting the Role of Mediation in Islamic Inheritance Disputes. Diponegoro Law Review, 7(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.14710/DILREV.7.2.2022.230-244
Said, W., Hukmiah, H., Nur, S., Wahyuni, S., & Akbar, R. (2024). Marriage Traditions and Family Resilience in Bugis Bone Society. Samarah, 8(3), 1372–1390. https://doi.org/10.22373/SJHK.V8I3.23227
Santoso, D., Jafar, W. A., Nasrudin, M., Asmara, M., & Fauzan. (2022). Harmony of Religion and Culture: Fiqh Munakahat Perspective on the Gayo Marriage Custom. Ijtihad, 22(2), 199–218.
Schaffnit, S. B., Urassa, M., & Lawson, D. W. (2019). “Child Marriage” in Context. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 27(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2019.1571304
Shesa, L., Dzar, M. A., Elkhairati, & Utami, H. S. (2024). Reformulating Progressive Fiqh of Talak (Divorce). MILRev, 3(2), 236–262.
Sopyan, Y., & Asyraf, A. (2018). Mahar and Paenre Regardless of Social Strata Bugis Women. Jurnal Cita Hukum, 6(1), 109–138.
Sudirman, S., Samin, S., Aidid, H., & Talli, A. H. T. (2019). Maslahah Review of the Dowry Bugis-Makassar Community. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 17(2), 164–179.
Syaflin Halim, Syamsurizal, Firdaus, Desminar, Jaffar, M. N., & Elma Rida Yanti. (2024). The Communication Patterns of Husband and Wife Couples in Resolving Household Conflicts. KARSA, 32(1), 33–71.
Syufaat, S. (2022). Marriage Dispensation in Underage Marriage. Al-Manahij, 16(1), 91–102.
Theriault, J. E., Young, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2021). The Sense of Should: A Biologically-Based Framework for Modeling Social Pressure. Physics of Life Reviews, 36, 100–136.
Utsany, R., Tw, A., & Khamim, K. (2022). Women’s Rights and Gender Equality. Journal of Islamic Law, 3(1), 54–73.
Wani, D. S. A., & Khan, J. B. (2024). Exploring the Legal and Cultural Significance of Dower Rights. Panjab University Law Review, 63(1), 58–72.
Yenti, E., Busyro, B., Ismail, I., Rosman, E., & Wadi, F. (2020). A Set of Prayer Outfits as a Mahar? Al-Risalah, 20(1), 17–30.
Zubaidah, D. A. (2019). Pencatatan Perkawinan sebagai Perlindungan Hukum dalam Perspektif Maqasid al-Shariah. Al-Ahwal, 12(1), 15–28.
Interview
Bakry, M. (2023). Interview with the General Secretary of the Indonesian Ulema Council of South Sulawesi Province.
Mawar (48 years old). Interview with ex-wife whose dowry was used, Maradekaya Village, 13 May 2023.
Jafaruddin (48 years old). Interview with a Religious Leader in Maradekaya Village, Gowa, 13 May 2023.
Ramli, A. R. (2023). Interview with Islamic Law Academician.
Sitti Asma Dg Coa (80 years old). Interview with the Birth Mother of Mawar, Gowa, 15 May 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdillah, Salih Yousif Sharaf, Annisa Dwi Fadillah Halim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
