Controversy Over Non-Madhhab Practices
A Critical Analysis of the Perspective of Ramadhan Al-Buthy about Contemporary Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.51275Keywords:
Non-Madhhab Practices, Islamic Law, Muhammad Sa'id Ramadhan Al-Buthy, Legal Consistency, Traditional Madhhab MethodologiesAbstract
This study aims to thoroughly examine the dangers associated with not adhering to a specific madhhab in contemporary Islamic law from the perspective of Muhammad Sa'id Ramadhan Al-Buthy. In order to accurately achieve the study objective, a comprehensive examination of Al-Buthy’s critique concerning non-madhhab practices was carried out, with a primary focus on how these practices could disrupt legal interpretations and undermine the authority of Islamic jurisprudence. The analysis included the process of reviewing primary texts, scholarly commentaries, and secondary literature, all of which were carried out with the aim of accurately comparing the critique by Al-Buthy with other contemporary perspectives on the issue. The results showed that Al-Buthy strongly criticized non-madhhab movement for promoting subjective and inconsistent interpretations of Islamic law. The figure argued that this movement was capable of weakening the structured and scholarly tradition of Islamic jurisprudence. Furthermore, Al-Buthy emphasized that established madhhab played a very important role in preserving the integrity and continuity of Islamic legal principles, underscoring the dangers associated with abandoning these schools, including fragmentation and a lack of authoritative guidance. The critique of the observed figure typically emphasizes the risks of non-madhhab practices, such as the potential for division in Muslim community. This study makes a novel contribution by specifically focusing on Al-Buthy’s critique, which are often cited but not deeply analyzed in the context of non-madhhab movements. Specifically, the investigation situated the arguments of the observed figure in contemporary debates on the role of madhhab, thereby offering a fresh perspective on the relationship between traditional Islamic jurisprudence and modern legal challenges. The implications are particularly significant for scholars, legal practitioners, and policymakers in Islamic law, advocating for a renewed commitment to traditional legal frameworks to prevent the pitfalls of subjective interpretations associated with non-madhhab methodologies.
References
Al-Azem, T. (2021). Conscience and Action in the Islamic Madhhab-Law Tradition. In Rules and Ethics (pp. 190–210). Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526148919.00017
Al-Farsi, K. (2022). Exploring Sharia Law in Islamic Jurisprudence. Social Science Chronicle, 1(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.56106/ssc.2022.009
Albelahi, A. M. A., Ali, A., Mohmed, F., & Ali, M. (2018). The Theory of Interpretation in Solving Contemporary Legal Issues: With a Focus on the Instrument of Ijtihad. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 5056. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005056
Ammerman, N. T. (2020). Rethinking Religion: Toward a Practice Approach. American Journal of Sociology, 126(1), 6–51. https://doi.org/10.1086/709779
Arifin, Z., & Haqqi, A. R. A. (2024). Islamic Law: Between Revelation and Human Thoughts. Afkar: Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam, 26(1), 277–306. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.vol26no1.9
Arjana, S. R. (2016). The Study of Shi'i Islam: History, Theology and Law. American Journal of Islam and Society, 33(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v33i1.892
Azamat, A., Kairat, A., & Ajzhan, C. (2022). Some Points of View Regarding Human Rights in Islamic Law. The Kazakh-American Free University Academic Journal, 278.
Bashayreh, M. (2022). The Authority of Judges under Shariah: Perspectives on Recent Legal Reforms in Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Law and Islamic Law, 18(2), 42–67.
Bitar, M., Hassan, M. K., & Walker, T. (2017). Political Systems and the Financial Soundness of Islamic Banks. Journal of Financial Stability, 31, 18–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.06.002
Brown, J. A. C. (2016). Reaching into the Obscure Past: The Islamic Legal Heritage and Reform in the Modern Period. In Reclaiming Islamic Tradition: Modern Interpretations of the Classical Heritage (pp. 100–135). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474403122-007
Bruce, T. (2018). New Technologies, Continuing Ideologies: Online Reader Comments as a Support for Media Perspectives of Minority Religions. Discourse, Context & Media, 24, 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.10.001
Chizari, N. (2024). Determining Taftazani’s Madhhab: Insights after the Decline Paradigm. Darulfunun Ilahiyat, 35(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2023.34.2.1296825
Cohen, A. B., Wu, M. S., & Miller, J. (2016). Religion and Culture: Individualism and Collectivism in the East and West. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(9), 1236–1249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116667895
De Donno, G., Giunta, E., El-Far, M., & Shehata, J. (2018). The Role of Sharia as a Source of Law: Looking for a Pragmatic Approach. JUS, 1, 375–415.
DeLong-Bas, N. J. (2022). Wahhabism and Salafism in Global Perspective. In Wahhabism and the World. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197532560.003.0002
Elmahjub, E. (2021). Islamic Jurisprudence as an Ethical Discourse. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023
Fidiana, F. (2020). Compliance Behaviour from the Holistic Human Nature Perspective. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(5), 1145–1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-11-2016-0142
Gad Makhlouf, A. (2021). The Doctrinal Development of Contemporary Islamic Law. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(3), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwac005
Gad Makhlouf, A. (2023). Continuity and Change of Traditional Islamic Law in Modern Times. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad010
Ghanem, T. (2020). Texts, Language, and History in the Madhhab-Law Tradition: A Study of the Shafii School.
Gould, R. (2015). Ijtihad against Madhhab. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 57(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417514000590
Graf, A. (2016). Malaysia’s Niche in International Higher Education. TRaNS, 4(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2015.16
Halim, F. A. (2015). Reformulating the Madhhab in Cyberspace. Islamic Law and Society, 22(4), 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00224p04
Ismail, N. (2019). The Mufti and the State Administration of Islam. Journal of Islam in Asia, 16(3), 344–373. https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v16i3.806
Jahangir, H., & Pakeeza, S. (2022). Rapprochement Strategies in Islamic Madhhabs. Al-Qalam, 27(2), 1–27.
Jamaluddin, S., Djakat, M., Hidayatussalam, H., & Samin, S. (2023). Opportunities and Challenges of the Implementation of Islamic Law in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 2177–2186. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i5.4930
Jany, J. (2020). Legal Traditions in Asia. In Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice (pp. 163–230). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2
Kamali, M. H. (2016). Caliphate and Political Jurisprudence in Islam. The Muslim World, 106(2), 384–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12145
Khan, P. (2021). An Outlook from Historical Review of Imam Malik Ibn Anas’s Principles. Al-Azhar, 7(02), 18–26.
Kizilkaya, N. (2020). Scholarship and Education in Islamic Law and Economics. Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 7(2), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.26414/A188
Mohiuddin, A. (2023). Religious Authority in Islam. In Navigating Religious Authority in Muslim Societies (pp. 117–163). Springer.
Moustafa, T., & Sachs, J. A. (2018). Islamic Law, Society, and the State. Law & Society Review, 52(3), 560–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12360
Muhammadin, F. (2020). Fiqh Al-Jihad in the Contemporary World.
Murphy, A. M. (2020). Islam in Indonesian Foreign Policy.
Oluwaseun, S. S. (2022). An Examination of the Major Madhhabs. Journal of Shariah Law Research, 7(2), 161–184.
Pakeeza, S., & Jahangir, H. (2023). Unification of Muslim Ummah. OEconomia, 6(2), 200–230.
Peters, R. (2020). What Does It Mean to Be an Official Madhhab? In Sharia, Justice and Legal Order (pp. 585–599). Brill.
Picken, G. N. (2015). The Concept of Sunna in the Early Shafii Madhhab. In The Sunna and Its Status in Islamic Law (pp. 139–162).
Pill, S. C. (2018). Knowing Sharia Law. Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law, 18, 1.
Pitlik, H., & Rode, M. (2017). Individualistic Values and Institutional Trust. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(3), 575–598.
Powell, E. J. (2022). Complexity and Dissonance. International Studies Review, 24(1).
Rachlinski, J. J., & Wistrich, A. J. (2017). Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13(1), 203–229.
Rafay, A., Sadiq, R., & Ajmal, M. (2016). Fragmentation of Islamic Financial Products. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences.
Ramadhan, M. (2020). Feedback Ali Abdul Raziq System of Khilafah. Global Journal Al-Thaqafah, 10(10), 1–27.
Sebastian, L. C., & Othman Alkaff, S. H. (2024). Ideologies and Their Importance in Shaping Islam. In Indonesia and Islam in Transition (pp. 71–131). Springer.
Suhadi, Mashdurohatun, A., & Gunarto. (2022). Reconstruction of Indonesian Islamic Law Compilation. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 5(3), 122–127.
Vanberg, G. (2015). Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1), 167–185.
Wahid, S. H. (2024). Research Insights on Online Fatwas. Journal of Fatwa Management and Research, 29(1), 23–46.
Zartman, I. W. (2019). Dynamics and Constraints in Negotiating Internal Conflicts.
Zubair, S., & Zubair, M. (2017). Situating Islamic Feminism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 63, 17–26.
Bektenova, M., Seitakhmetova, N., & Toktarbekova, L. (2021). The Phenomenon of Islamic Identity in the Religious and Cultural Context of Islamic Philosophy. Adam Alemi, 88(2), 122–131.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hamzah Abed Alkarim Hammad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




