Analysis of Ibn Qudāmah's Comparative Fiqh Methodology in al-Mugnī and Its Relevance for Contemporary Ijtihad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.54759Abstract
This study investigates the methodology of muqāranah al-mażāhib (comparative of madhhabs) as applied by Ibn Qudāmah in his seminal work, Kitāb al-Mugnī, a key reference in the landscape of Islamic jurisprudence in Indonesia. The primary purpose is to critically analyze Ibn Qudāmah’s comparative legal approach and assess its relevance for contemporary ijtihad. Employing a qualitative method, the research utilizes content analysis and textual hermeneutics to examine selected chapters of al-Mugnī—specifically those related to acts of worship and mu‘āmalah (social transactions). The findings reveal that Ibn Qudāmah's method systematically compares the legal views of the four major Sunni madhhabs and includes perspectives from other jurists, presenting them with detailed argumentation and rational justification. His use of tarjīḥ (preference) reflects a critical evaluative process that selects the most compelling legal opinion based on textual evidence and reasoning. The originality of this study lies in its focused analysis of Ibn Qudāmah's structured comparative technique, which balances scholarly objectivity with methodological rigor. The implications of this research are significant for contemporary Islamic legal scholarship, particularly in advancing the practice of collective ijtihad, refining fatwa formulation processes, and fostering a tolerant yet disciplined engagement with legal diversity. Furthermore, the integration of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah into this comparative framework enriches its applicability in addressing modern socio-legal issues.
References
Afrinal, A., & Darmawan, A. (2022). Pemenuhan Nafkah Anak Pasca Perceraian. Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(1), 59–70. https://journals.fasya.uinib.org/index.php/sakena/article/view/222
Al Ghazali. (1993). Al-Mustashfa fi Ilm al-Ushul. Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
Al Syatibi. (1997). Al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Shariah. Dar Ibn Affan.
Alfi Maghfiroh, V. (2022). Studi Pemikiran Ibnu Qudamah Tentang Nikah Bersyarat. Mahakim: Journal of Islamic Family Law, 3(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.30762/mahakim.v3i1.127
Alfian, M. K., & Misbahuzzulam. (2023). Analisis Pendapat Imam Nawawi dan Ibnu Qudamah Tentang Masa Iddah Wanita Hamil Karena Zina. Rayah Al-Islam, 7(3), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.37274/rais.v7i3.787
Ashidiqie, M. L. I. I. (2021). Kritik Atas Peraturan Wali Nikah Dalam KHI dan Fikih Perspektif Gender. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 9(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-mazaahib.v9i1.2304
Auda, J. (2008). Membumikan Hukum Islam Melalui Maqashid Syariah. Mizan Pustaka.
Azhari, F. (2016). Metode Istinbath Hukum Ibn Rusyd Dalam Kitab Bidayah al-Mujtahid. Tashwir: Jurnal Penelitian Agama dan Budaya, 4(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.18592/jt.v3i8.603
Bakri, A. J. (1996). Konsep Maqashid Syariah Menurut Al-Syatibi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Chalil, M. (1994). Biografi Empat Serangkai Imam Madhhab (9th ed.). PT Bulan Bintang.
Daud, Z. F. M. (2021). Fiqh Across Madhhabs: An Alternative to Pesantren Students’ School of Thought Exclusivism in the Post-Truth Era. Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 20(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i1.3081
Faikoh, I., & Silahuddin, M. (2023). Penggunaan Metodologi Dalam Penetapan Fatwa Murabahah Dari Sudut Pandang Ushul Fiqh. An Nawawi: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam, 3(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.55252/annawawi.v3i1.29
Fanani, A. (2021). The Hanbalite Theology: A Critical Study of the Hanbalite Theological Creeds and Polemical Adversaries. Afkaruna, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18196/afkaruna.v17i1.11353
Ghazali, M. B., & Djumadris. (1992). Perbandingan Mazhab. Pedoman Ilmu Jaya.
Hasanah, T. (2020). Metode Istinbath Hukum Nafkah Iddah Talak Bain Menurut Syafiiyyah. Nizham Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(2), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.32332/nizham.v8i02.2705
Hendika, Y., & Armi, I. (2022). Pendapat Ibnu Qudamah Tentang Syarat Kafaah Dalam Perkawinan. Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(2), 170–181. https://journals.fasya.uinib.org/index.php/sakena/article/view/201
Jumantoro, T., & Amin, S. M. (2019). Kamus Ilmu Ushul Fikih. Amzah.
Komalasari, E., Arif, S., & Irfani, F. (2022). Hak Istri dalam Masa Iddah Talak Bain menurut Empat Mazhab dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 16144–16151. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v6i2.4970
Kurniawan, A. W., Awaludin, M., & Husein, M. F. (2023). Perbandingan Metode Memahami Perbedaan Diantara Ulama Mazhab Fiqih. Islamic Education, 1(2), 73–80.
Maradingin. (2020). Pengantar Perbandingan Mazhab. Farha Pustaka. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/8657/
Mokhtar, R., Haron, M. S., & Talib, D. H. (2018). The Methodology of Talil Ahkam by Ibnu Qudamah: Analysis on Al-Mughni. Journal of Muwafaqat, 1(2), 118–134.
Morgan, S., & bin Sulong, J. (2020). Punishment for Apostasy: A Review and Choosing the Right Perspective (Tarjih). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(6), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i6/7370
Najah, A. N. (2019). Larangan Jual Beli Ketika Shalat Jumat Dalam Kajian Tafsir Ahkam Fi Al-Muamalah. Tahkim, 15(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.33477/thk.v15i1.863
Najib, A. M. (2020). Reestablishing Indonesia Madhhab: Urf and the Contribution of Intellectualism. Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 58(1), 171–208. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2020.581.171-208
Noor, U. M. (2020). Traditionist Internal Reform: Motives Behind the Birth of the First Manual of Ulum al-Hadith. Ilahiyat Studies, 11(2), 295–316. https://doi.org/10.12730/13091719.2020.112.211
Padil, M., & Tharaba, M. F. (2017). Ushul Fiqih: Dasar, Sejarah, dan Aplikasi Ushul Fiqh dalam Ranah Sosial. Madani.
Qudamah, I. (2007). Al-Mughni (Jilid 1). Pustaka Azzam.
Qudamah, I. (2007). Al-Mughni (Jilid 3). Pustaka Azzam.
Qudamah, I. (2011). Al-Mughni (Jilid 8). Pustaka Azzam.
Qudamah, I. (2012). Al-Mughni (Jilid 9). Pustaka Azzam.
Qudamah, I. (2013). Al-Mughni (Jilid 11). Pustaka Azzam.
Qudamah, I. (2020). Umdatul Fiqh (4th ed.). Al Qowam.
Rahman, H. (2022). Analisis Konten (Content Analysis). Dalam S. R. Wahyuningrum (Ed.), Ragam Analisis Data Penelitian. IAIN Madura Press.
Rizka, K., & Cahyono, L. D. (2023). Perbandingan Hukum dan Mazhab-Mazhab dalam Islam. Moefty: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum, 12(1), 21–30.
Romli SA. (2014). Studi Perbandingan Ushul Fiqh (1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Roslan, A. N. B. M., & Zuhri, A. (2023). Hukum Memperdagangkan Barang Luqathah Perspektif Imam Syafii. Arbiter: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 5(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v5i1.1738
Sharif, D., Mohamed @ Haji Daud, N., Wan Jusoh, W. N. H., Ishak, A. H., & Ismail, F. A. (2020). The Methodology of Comparative School of Thought on al-Rahn Discussion. Afkar, Special Issue 1, 47–78. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.sp2020no1.3
Shidiq, S. (2021). Studi Awal Perbandingan Mazhab dalam Fikih. Kencana.
Yanggo, H. T. (2003). Pengantar Perbandingan Mazhab. Logos.
Yunta, A. H. D., Anshor, S. B., & Paramata, M. A. E. (2023). The Validity of Tafwid of Divorce in Review of Munakahat Jurisprudence. Bustanul Fuqaha, 4(3), 532–557. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v4i3.1206
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khairatun Hisan, Dzulkifli Hadi Imawan, Hannafa Haqqiya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.





