The Dialectical Interplay of Ikhtilāf al-Ṣaḥābah (Companions’ Disagreements)
The Constructive Role of Diversity in Early Islamic Jurisprudence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.55188Keywords:
Juridical DisagreementsAbstract
This study examines the factors underlying juridical disagreements among the Prophet’s Companions, aiming to challenge the perception that such differences were inherently divisive and instead highlighting their constructive role in the development of Islamic jurisprudence. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach based on library research, the study analyzes classical and modern sources to identify both internal factors, such as variations in linguistic interpretation, reasoning methods, and levels of knowledge, and external factors, including geographical, social, and political contexts, that shaped the Companions’ interpretations of the Qur’an and Hadith or guided their ijtihad when explicit scriptural evidence was absent. Case studies such as the ruling on triple divorce, the punishment for drinking khamr, and the timing of the ‘Asr prayer at Banu Qurayzah demonstrate the diversity of legal opinions that emerged in early Islam. The originality of this research lies in its emphasis on the dialectical interplay between internal and external dynamics, moving beyond simplistic views of disagreement as conflict. The findings imply that the Companions’ differences should be understood as intellectual diversity and tolerance within the classical fiqh tradition, offering valuable insights for contemporary discussions on Islamic legal thought.
References
Abdullaieva, T., Gafuri, R., Akhatov, H., & Aga, K. (2021). Problems of Interpreting the Main Types of Hadith in Terms of Their Correct Understanding. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(June), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v5nS4.1560
Aisy, A. R., Azzahrani, A., Setyanto, B. A., Setiawan, D. A., & Najmuddin, D. (2023). Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Jarimah Khamr dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Dakwah, 2(1). https://ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/tashdiq/article/view/1650
Al-Amin, I. (2007). Manhaj Al-Naqdi fi Tafsir.
Al-Khatib, M. A. (1997). Usul al-Hadis. Gaya media Pratama.
Al-Munjid, N. al-D. (1999). Al-Musytarak Lafdzi fi al-Qur’an al-Karim. Dar al-Fikr.
Al-Qardhawi, Y. (2018). Madkhal li Dirasah al-Syariah al-Islamiyyah (Cet. 5). Maktabah Wahabah.
Al-Qaththan, M. (1989). Al-Tasyri wa al-Fiqh di al-Islam. Dar al-Ma’arif.
Al-Shabbaghal, M. (1972). al-Hadits al-Nabawi. al-Maktab al-Islam.
Al-Suyuthi, J. (2005). Tadrib al-Rawi. al-Muassasah al-Risalah.
Al-Zuhaili, W. (1986). Ususl al-Fiqh al-Islami. Dar al-Fikr.
Anam, W., & Ilaina, R. (2023). Problematika Autentifikasi Hadis Periode Sahabat: Antara Keadilan dan Intrik Politik. Jurnal Empirisme, 32(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30762/empirisma.v32i1.836
As-Sayyid Salim, A. M. K. (2012). Shahih Fiqih Sunnah: Ilmu Fiqih pada Zaman Sahabat. Pustaka at-Tazkia.
As-Shiddiqiey, H. (1992). Pengantar Hukum Islam. Bulan Bintang.
Azharuddin, Irham, M. I., & Wanto, S. (2024). Sighat Talak: Studi Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Pada Kekhalifahan Umar Ibn Khattab. Maqasidi: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v4i1.3002
Gafur, A. A. (2008). Hukum Islam Dinamika dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Kreasi Total Media.
Hadi, A., & Muhammad, A. S. (n.d.). Ikhtilaf Shohabah: Asbabuhu wa Atsaruhu fi Fiqhil Islam. Maktabah Madbuli.
Hasan, A. (n.d.). al-Nahwu al-Wafi. Darel Ma’rifah.
Hussein, I. (1971). Perbandingan Mazhab dalam Masalah Nikah, Thalaq dan Ruju’. Balai Pustaka dan Perpustakaan Islam.
Ibnu Hajar Al-Asqalani. (2013). Bulugul Maram dan Dalil-dalil Hukum. Gema Insani.
Ikhsan, M. (2016). Membedah Faktor-faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Ikhtilaf di Kalangan Ulama. Nukhbatul ’Ulum, 2(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v2i1.10
Junah, A. K. (n.d.). Al-Qur’an dalam Pandangan Sahabat Nabi. Gema Insani Press.
Kahraman, H. (2022). The Issue of Deliberately Abandoning of Prayers for Reasons Exclusive of Sleeping and Forgetting: Rewiewing the Evidence based on the Practice in the Battle of al-Khandaq. Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi, 26(1), 269–285. https://doi.org/10.18505/cuid.1053291
Khan, A., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Conflicts between the Companions of the Prophet in the light of Sunnah. Al-Iddah, 40(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.37556/al-idah.040.01.0768
Khanif, A. (2020). The Shafii s and the School of Shafi ite s (the Nawawi’s and Ramli s) Concept of Kafaah. Ulumuddin: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies, 13(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.22219/ulumuddin.v1i1.12722
Khoiri, M. A. (2016). Kedudukan Qaul Sahabat Dalam Istinbat Hukum Islam Analisis Komparatif Pemikiran Ibnu Hazm Dan Wahbah Az-Zuhaili (The Position Of Qaul Sahabat In Istinbat Of Islamic Law The Comparative Analysis Of Ibnu Hazm And Wahbah Az-Zuhaili’s Thought). Jurnal SMART, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v2i2.396
Latif, A., Shiddiq, J., Ahmad Fadhel, S. H., Mahdi, R., & Amin, I. (2022). Keutamaan Aspek Linguistik Bahasa Arab Menurut Pemikiran Ibnu Katsir. Hijai.
Maula, B. S. (2023). The Concept of Sulh and Mediation in Marriage Conflict Resolution in Religious Courts: A Comparative Study between Contemporary Indonesian Family Law and Classical Islamic Law. El-Aqwal : Journal of Sharia and Comparative Law, 2(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.24090/el-aqwal.v2i1.7777
Muhamad, N., Khamarudin, M., & Mohd Fauzi, W. I. (2018). The Role of Religious Motivation in an International Consumer Boycott. British Food Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-02-2018-0118
Mustafawi, S. Z. (2014). Huruf Fa`: Macam Dan Maknanya Dalam Kitab Nahjul Balaghah Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Ilmu Nahwu. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Nur, I., Adam, S., & Muttaqien, M. N. (2020). and Ethical-Spiritual Foundation for the Dynamization Process of Islamic Law. Ahk, 20(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i2.18333
Oba, I. B. (2023). The dynamics of Islamic marital jurisprudence in Islamic courts: the experience of the Kwara state and Zanzibar. IJoReSH: Indonesian Journal of Religion, Spirituality, and Humanity, 2(1), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijoresh.v2i1.43-67
Paryadi, & Sadari. (2020). Perbedaan Fatwa-Fatwa Sahabat Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam. Misykat, 7(2).
Puyu, D. S. (2016). Kontroversi Keadilan Para Sahabat (Pertarungan dalam Kritik Hadis). Misykat, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/tahdis.v7i2.2777
Sabir, M., & Muchsin, A. (2019). Urgensi Fiqh Sahabat Terhadap Konstruksi Metodologi Hukum Islam. Al-Adl, 12(2).
Sadewa, M. A. (2021). Penafsiran Masa Sahabat, Di antara Perbedaan Pemahaman dan Perpecahan Umat. Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadits, 15(2), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.24042/al-dzikra.v15i2.10014
Santoso, D. (2021). Pemikiran Imam SyafiiI Tentang Ketentuan Quru Dalam Surat Al Baqarah Ayat 228 dan Relevansinya. Jurnal Mabahits Hukum Keluarga. https://doi.org/https://repository.metrouniv.ac.id/id/eprint/5349/
Santuraki, S. U. (2018). the Legal Framework on Rebellion and Insurgency in Islamic Law and Customary International Law: a Review. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 6(2), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol6no2.140
Sirriy, M. (1995). Sejarah Fiqih Islam Sebuah Pengantar. Risalah Gusti.
Sodiqin, A. (2025). Religion and Science: Analysing Medical Fatwas of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (2010–2021). Journal of Islamic Law, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v6i1.2683
Syafe’i, R. (1999). Ilmu Ushul Fiqh. Pustaka Setia.
Syarif, F. (2020). the Contextual Interpretation of Polygamy Verses in the Qur’an. Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21580/jish.v5i1.5212
Syarifuddin, A. (1997). Ushul Fiqh. LkiS Yogyakarta.
Tabrani, M. (2018). Maqashid Revitalization in Global Era: Istidlal Study from Text to Context. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 13(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-ihkam.v13i2.1814
Tujang, B. (2015). Al Nasikh wa Al Mansukh: Deskripsi Metode Interpretasi Hadis Kontradiktif. Al-Majalis, 2(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37397/almajaalis.v2i2.28
University, A.-A. (2010). Tarikh Tasyri Islami. Al-Azhar University.
Usman, I. (2021). Hadis pada Masa Rasulullah dan Sahabat: Studi Kritis terhadap Pemeliharaan Hadis. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 4(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v4i1.9173
van Engelenhoven, G. (2021). From Indigenous Customary Law to Diasporic Cultural Heritage: Reappropriations of Adat Throughout the History of Moluccan Postcolonial Migration. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34(3), 695–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09781-y
Yakar, E. E. (2022). Women’s Political Leadership: One Question and Two Divergent Fatwas. Journal of Law and Religion, 37(2), 332–362. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2022.15
Zahid, R. A. (2016). Sebab-Sebab Terjadinya Perbedaan Mazhab. Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 26(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v26i1.203
Zailani, Z., Bay, K., & Chalida, S. (2016). Reinterpretasi Terhadap Pemahaman Hadits-Hadits Tentang Gender Dalam Perspektif Fiqh Al-Hadits. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 24(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v24i1.1516
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sinta Hardiyanti Utami, Esya Heryana, Mutiara Fajriyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.





