Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah and the Ethics of Surrogacy: A Critical Appraisal of Lineage and Legal Certainty in Contemporary Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.56753Abstract
The growing application of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) in Muslim contexts suggests the need to examine the legal and ethical implications of surrogacy in the framework of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (the objectives of Islamic law). Therefore, this study aims to assess the compatibility of surrogacy, both traditional and gestational forms, with the core objectives of Sharīʿah, particularly the preservation of religion (ḥifẓ al-dīn), life (ḥifẓ an-nafs), lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl), and wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl). The methodology was based on a comprehensive textual analysis of Islamic legal sources, including the Qur’an, Sunnah, classical juristic writings, contemporary fatwas, and modern bioethical debates. By examining the materials, the analysis explored how surrogacy introduced legal and moral disruptions, particularly concerning lineage (nasab), maternal identity, inheritance, and the sanctity of the marital relationship. The results showed that surrogacy practices contradicted essential objectives of Islamic law by generating uncertainty in family structures, severing the connection between biological and legal motherhood, as well as undermining principles critical to Islamic family jurisprudence. These concerns were affirmed by the near-consensus among major Islamic juristic bodies, which categorized surrogacy as impermissible (ḥarām). The originality of this study is grounded in the systematic application of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to a contemporary bioethical issue, showing the depth and coherence of Islamic legal reasoning in regulating modern reproductive technologies. In conclusion, enacting clear legislative prohibitions is recommended in Muslim-majority countries as well as continuous ijtihād to evaluate future biomedical developments in maqāṣid framework.
References
Academy, I. F. (2000). Resolutions and Recommendations of the Council of the Islamic Fiqh Academy 1985-2000. Islamic Research and Training Institute. https://iifa-aifi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Resolutions-Recommendations-of-the-IIFA-Official-Edition-Oct-2021.pdf
al-Islami, M. al-F. (2000). Resolutions and recommendations of the Council of the Islamic Fiqh Academy 1985-2000. Islamic Research and Training Institute Islamic Development Bank.
Al-Misriyyah, D. al-I. (2015). Does a Surrogate Mother Have Rights on the Child She Carries. https://www.dar-alifta.org/en/fatwa/details/8319/does-a-surrogate-mother-have-rights-on-the-child-she-carries
Alon, I., Chebance, Z., Massucci, F. A., Bounartzi, T., & Ravitsky, V. (2023). Mapping International Research Output within Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 40(9), 2023–2043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02834-8
Alvi, A., & Rizwan, M. (2023). Retracing the Islamic Prohibition on Genetic Gestational Surrogacy (Uterine Service) for Married Couples: Scientific and Analogical Perspectives. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(1), 62–89. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.501010610407923
Amalia, R., & Sudistina, S. (2024). Examining Ushul Fiqh Principles on the Surrogacy-based In Vitro Fertilization Program. KnE Social Sciences, 9(3), 664–677. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i2.15023
Ansari, A., & Saeed, S. (2023). A Comprehensive Examination of Surrogacy within the Islamic Framework. GUMAN, 6(4), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.63075/guman.v6i4.680
Asad, M. (2017). Shariat Court Okays ‘Test-Tube Babies.’ Dawn (Islamabad). https://www.dawn.com/news/1316260
Barac, I. (2023). Surrogacy–A Biomedical Mechanism in the Fight against Infertility, 71(2), 259–289. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1131041
Brandao, P., & Garrido, N. (2023). Commercial Surrogacy: an Overview. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 44, 1141–1158. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759774
Dashtizadeh, P., Mazloom Rahni, A., & Rajabzadeh, A. (2019). Legal and ethical challenges of surrogacy contracts in Iranian judicial and medical system. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics, 6(4), 52–58. http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-324-en.html
Dubagari, U. A., & Umar, A. (2025). Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART): Legal Framework for Surrogate Parenting under Islamic Law. Journal of Customary and Religious Law, 2(1), 125–135. https://journals.unizik.edu.ng/jocarl/article/view/5416
Dupret, B., Belkadi, A., Lindbekk, M., & Yakin, A. U. (2023). Paternal Filiation in Muslim-Majority Environments: A Comparative Look at the Interpretive Practice of Positive Islamic Law in Indonesia, Egypt, and Morocco. Journal of Law, Religion and State, 10(2–3), 167–217. https://brill.com/view/journals/jlrs/10/2-3/article-p167_005.xml
Ezeome, I. V. (2022). Gamete Donation—A review of Ethical and Legal Issues. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 26(3), 124–135. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajrh/article/view/226110
Farid, M. S. (2024). Ethical Issues in Sperm, Egg and Embryo Donation: Islamic Shia Perspectives. HEC Forum, 36(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-022-09498-4
Farooqi, M. A., Rizvi, A., & Khan, A. R. (2022). Exploring the Legality and Socio-Cultural Challenges of Surrogacy: An Islamic Bioethical Perspective. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6(2), 1302–1313. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2022(6-II)109
Gillani, S. H. A. S., Shabbir, N.-U.-A., & Farzand, A. (2024). Laws Regarding Family Inclusive of Marriage, Dowry, Custody, Divorce, Maintenanace and Inheritance. AL-IDRAK JOURNAL, 4(1), 91–106. https://www.alidrak.com/ojs3303/index.php/alidrak/article/view/141
Gunnarsson Payne, J., Korolczuk, E., & Mezinska, S. (2020). Surrogacy Relationships: a Critical Interpretative Review. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 125(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1725935
Hibino, Y. (2023). The advantages and disadvantages of altruistic and commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 18(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13010-023-00130-y
Ibrahim, A. H., Rahman, N. N. A., & Saifuddeen, S. M. (2018). Maqasid al-Shariah as a Complementary Framework for Conventional Bioethics: Application in Malaysian Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Fatwa. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1493–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9963-6
Ibrahim, A. H., Rahman, N. N. A., Saifuddeen, S. M., & Baharuddin, M. (2019). Maqasid al-Shariah Based Islamic Bioethics: A Comprehensive Approach. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 16(3), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-019-09902-8
Iqbal, R. (2023). Marital and Sexual Ethics in Islamic Law: Rethinking Temporary Marriage. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ismail, N., & Mohamad, A. B. (2024). The Perspectives of Legal Practitioners on the Concept and Categories of Third Parties in the Household under Islamic Family Law in Malaysia. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(2), 841–859. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i2.26652
Jones, H. (2018). Contracts for Children: Constitutional Challenges to Surrogacy Contracts and Selective Reduction Clauses. Hastings LJ, 70, 595. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/hastlj70&div=18&id=&page=
Khatun, M., Islam, M. A., & Latif, A. K. M. A. (2022). The Multifaceted Significance of Marriage: Exploring its role in Religion, Family Dynamics, Social Cohesion, and Economic Context. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (IJSSH), 7(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.58885/ijssh.v7i1.55.mk
Kooli, C. (2019). Review of Assisted Reproduction Techniques, Laws, and Regulations in Muslim Countries. Middle East Fertility Society Journal, 24(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-019-0011-0
Lozanski, K., & Shankar, I. (2019). Surrogates as Risk or Surrogates at Risk? The Contradictory Constitution of Surrogates’ Bodies in Transnational Surrogacy. Social Theory & Health, 17(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-0066-5
Margalit, Y. (2018). Temporary Marriage: a Comparison of the Jewish and Islamic Conceptions. Journal of Law and Religion, 33(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2018.12
Maulana, A., Akbar, Z., Habibie, R. A., Norhadi, M., & Hasuna, K. (2024). Inheritance Rights of Nasabiyyah Children Born Out of Wedlock According to Islamic Family Law. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(2), 444–461. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i2.25072
Mohadi, M. (2023). Normative Islamic Conceptualizations of Families and Kinship Through Maqasid Perspectives: A Comprehensive Literature Study. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 11(2), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.459
Moosa, E. (2021). Medicine and Shariah: A dialogue in Islamic bioethics. University of Notre Dame Pess.
Muhsin, S. M., Abdul Jalil, M. N., Al-Akiti, M. A., Duriat, F., Ahmad, M. F., & Chin, A. H. B. (2024). Synthetic Human Embryos, Embryo Models and Embryo-like Structures in Islam. Theology and Science, 22(4), 790–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2024.2399902
Mulligan, A. (2024). Surrogacy and the Significance of Gestation: Implications for Law and Policy. Bioethics, 38(8), 674–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13302
Nazari Tavakkoli, S. (2022). The Status of Mother in Gestational Surrogacy: the Shii Jurisprudential Perspective. Asian Bioethics Review, 14(4), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-022-00217-2
Olaye-Felix, B., Allen, D. E., & Metcalfe, N. H. (2023). Surrogacy and the Law in the UK. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 99(1170), 358–362. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2022-141625
Oniye, M. A. (2001). The Distribution of Estate in Islam-The Law and Practice. In Ilorin: Kewudamilola Printing Press and Computer Centre.
Padela, A. I., Klima, K., & Duivenbode, R. (2020). Producing Parenthood: Islamic Bioethical Perspectives & Normative Implications. The New Bioethics, 26(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2020.1729575
Padela, A. I., Klima, K., & Duivenbode, R. (2021). Producing Parenthood: Islamic Juridical Perspectives & Theological Implications BT - Multicultural and Interreligious Perspectives on the Ethics of Human Reproduction: Protecting Future Generations. In J. Tham, A. Garcia Gómez, & J. Lunstroth (Eds.), Multicultural and Interreligious Perspectives on the Ethics of Human Reproduction (pp. 169–190). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86938-0_17
Patel, N. H., Jadeja, Y. D., Bhadarka, H. K., Patel, M. N., Patel, N. H., & Sodagar, N. R. (2018). Insight Into Different Aspects of Surrogacy Practices. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 11(3), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_138_17
Persekutuan, P. M. W. (2016). Irsyad al-Fatwa Series 130: The Ruling of Surrogate Mother. Mufti of Federal Territory’s Office.
Peterson, H. (2018). Finding ‘Mr Right’? Childfree Women’s Partner Preferences. In N. Sappleton (Ed.), Voluntary and Involuntary Childlessness: The Joys of Otherhood? (p. 0). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-361-420181011
Salazar, A., Diaz-García, C., & García–Velasco, J. A. (2023). Third-Party Reproduction: a Treatment that Grows with Societal Changes. Fertility and Sterility, 120(3, Part 1), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.019
Shabana, A. (2015). Foundations of the Consensus against Surrogacy Arrangements in Islamic Law. Islamic Law and Society, 22(1–2), 82–113. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-02212p03
Shestak, V. A., Tsyplakova, A. D., & Kholikov, I. V. (2023). Legal Situation Regarding Assessed Reproduction Technologies in Muslim Countries. Siberian Journal of Life Sciences and Agriculture, 15(1), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.12731/2658-6649-2023-15-1-435-453
Staff Reporter. (2001). Egypt Bans Surrogate Motherhood. https://mg.co.za/article/2001-04-02-egypt-bans-surrogate-motherhood/
Thoma, M., Fledderjohann, J., Cox, C., & Kantum Adageba, R. (2021). Biological and Social Aspects of Human Infertility: A Global Perspective. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.184
Tribune, T. E. (2011). Surrogacy Banned Under Malaysian Fatwa. The Express Tribune. https://tribune.com.pk/story/125708/surrogacy-banned-under-malaysian-fatwa
Trimmings, K., Shakargy, S., & Achmad, C. (2024). Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802207651
Yassari, N. (2022). Caught Between Religion and Law: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Iran. In The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (pp. 81–105). Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004520806_006
Zawawi, M., Mohd, A., & Hussain, B. (2024). Nasab (Filiation) of Children in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) under Shari’ah Discourse. IIUM Law Journal, 32(1), 27–64. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v32i1.911
Zubaedah, P. A. (2024). Exploring The Legal and Ethical Implications of Surrogacy Agreements In Family Law: A Comparative Study. Nusa: Journal of Science Studies, 1(1), 10–19. https://aisthesis.my.id/index.php/nusa/article/view/7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Folorunsho Ahmad Hussein, Abdulraheem Taofeeq Abolaji, Abdulsalam Sodiq Gbolahan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
