The Principles of Natural Justice: A Comparative Analysis between Secular and Islamic Law in Administrative Decision-Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.56855Keywords:
Natural Justice, Islamic Law, Common Law, Comparative Law, Rule against BiasAbstract
This study aims to examine the principles of natural justice as conceptualized and applied in both common law and Islamic legal systems, with particular attention to the right to a fair hearing (audi alteram partem) and the rule against bias (nemo judex in causa sua). The underlying values, interpretive methods, and procedural expressions of these principles were also assessed across distinct legal traditions. The study procedures were carried out using a qualitative comparative legal methodology. Data were obtained from primary sources, judicial precedents, and scholarly interpretations to analyze the doctrinal foundations and practical applications in both systems. The results showed that although Islamic law was based on religious texts and common law on judicial precedents, both systems upheld the core values of justice, fairness, impartiality, and procedural integrity. Islamic law established these principles in the Qur’an, Sunnah (Hadith), and interpretive tools, such as ijtihād, maṣlaḥah, and istiḥsān, while common law emphasized constitutional norms and case law. The originality of this study lies in its integrated approach, which shows both the convergence and divergence of procedural justice across secular and religious frameworks. The results are significant for fostering cross-cultural legal understanding and informing reforms in pluralistic jurisdictions. Although primarily theoretical, this current study provides a foundation for future empirical studies in countries such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and Nigeria, where both systems co-exist. These further studies could enrich discussions on legal pluralism and support the development of more inclusive legal systems.
References
Abdelzaher, D. M., Kotb, A., & Helfaya, A. (2019). Eco-Islam: Beyond the Principles of Why and What, and Into the Principles of How. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3518-2
Abra, E. H., & Wahanisa, R. (2020). The Constitutional Court Ultra Petita as a Protection Form of Economic Rights in Pancasila Justice. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 5(1), 187–224. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.35965
Ahmad, N., Haji Zainal, H. N., Shamsu, L. S., & Zamri, Z. (2025). Challenges of the Insanity Defence: Legal Perspectives on Mental Illness and Criminality in Brunei’s Dual Legal System. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 20(4), 150–177. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5197445
Ahmad, S., Qamar, A. J., Bhatti, M. A. A., & Bashir, U. (2023). Integrating Islamic Ethics with Modern Governance: A Comprehensive Framework for Accountability Across Religious, Social, and Economic Dimensions. Al-Irfan, 8(15), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.58932/MULB0043
Aljber, A. A. M., Javaheri Tehrani, M., Vaezi, S. M., & Mardani, N. (2025). The Role of the Federal Supreme Court in Ensuring the Supremacy of Moral Custom and Islamic Law in Iraq TT -. Ijethics, 6(4), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijethics.6.4.11
Anshori, A. Y., & Abdurrahman, L. T. (2025). History of the Development of Mazhab, Fiqh and Usul Al-Fiqh: Reasoning Methodology in Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.25355
Azzahra, R., & Shuaib, F. S. (2022). Religious Courts in Indonesia and Malaysia: History, Structure, and Jurisdiction. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 4(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v4i2.15911
Bari, H. M. F. (2019). Evolution of the Criminal Justice System in Bangladesh: Colonial Legacies, Trends and Issues. Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 45(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2019.1681285
Bayoumi, S., & Hamdy, S. (2023). Nationalism, Authoritarianism, and Medical Mobilization in Post-revolutionary Egypt. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 47(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-022-09802-4
Bhat, S., & Nabi. (2024). Islamic ,Ethics Islamic Ethics: Exploring its Principles and Scope. International Journal of Applied Ethics, 10(23212497 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/10.51245/ijaethics.v10i1.2024.93
Brewer-Carias, A. R. (2023). Judicial Review in Comparative Law. Ediciones Olejnik. http://digital.casalini.it/9789563929737
Butt, J. S. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Natural Justice Principles in EU Administrative Law and Islamic Jurisprudence: A Developmental Perspective. Law Foyer Int’l J. Doctrinal Legal Rsch., 2, 422. https://lijdlr.com/2024/04/28/comparative-analysis-of-natural-justice-principles-in-eu-administrative-law-and-islamic-jurisprudence-a-developmental-perspective/
Butt, S. (2018). Religious Conservatism, Islamic Criminal Law and the Judiciary in Indonesia: a Tale of three Courts. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 402–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532025
Carrick, J., Bell, D., Fitzsimmons, C., Gray, T., & Stewart, G. (2023). Principles and Practical Criteria for Effective Participatory Environmental Planning and Decision-Making. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(14), 2854–2877. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2086857
Collins, P., & Golding, G. (2024). An Implied Term of Procedural Fairness During Disciplinary Processes: Into Contracts of Employment and Beyond? Industrial Law Journal, 53(2), 125–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwad030
Elmahjub, E. (2021). Islamic Jurisprudence as an Ethical Discourse: An Enquiry into the Nature of Moral Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023
Farid, C. (2023). Perceiving Law without Colonialism: Revisiting Courts and Constitutionalism in South Asia. International Journal of Law in Context, 19(3), 278–295. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S1744552323000083
Gaffar, H., & Al Mamari, S. (2024). From Roman Law to Sharia: Comparative Perspectives on the Evolution of Quasi-Contracts in Western and Islamic Jurisdictions. Griffith Law Review, 33(3), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2025.2487728
Gibbs, N. (2024). The Foundations of Constitutional Democracy: The Kelsen-Natural Law Controversy. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 37(1), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2024.3
Graber-Mitchell, N. (2022). All Rise for God: Toleration, Secularism, and the Role of Religion in Legal Adjudication. In Secularism, and the Role of Religion in Legal Adjudication. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4279915
Graham, L. (2024). Has the UK Supreme Court become more Restrained in Public Law Cases? Modern Law Review, 87(5), 1073–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12866
Graver, H. P. (2018). Judicial Independence Under Authoritarian Rule: An Institutional Approach to the Legal Tradition of the West. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 10(2), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0071-8
Grieve, S. (2023). Re-locating Discretion Amidst Artificial Administration: An Analysis of Emerging System-Level Bureaucracies in Canada’s Federal Government. Canadian Journal of Administrative Law & Practice, 36(3), 169–198.
Hammond, E. (2018). Procedural Fairness in Application Cases: Is Compellability of Consideration a Critical Safeguard? Australian Journal of Administrative Law, 25(2018), 122–140. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3625350#
Hanifah, H., Abdul Halim, H., Ahmad, N. H., & Vafaei-Zadeh, A. (2019). Emanating the key factors of innovation performance: leveraging on the innovation culture among SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(4), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-04-2018-0130
Hasan, K., Saif, M., & Khan, S. A. (2024). Rethinking the Conundrum of Law and Morality: Islamic Law between Popular Sovereignty and God’s Sovereignty. Manchester Journal of International Economic Law, 20(1), 1–32. https://www.electronicpublications.org/stuff/1042
Ismail, A. M., Maid, L. A., & Firas, M. F. (2024). Rethinking Justice: Unraveling the Tapestry of Justice in Islamic and Western Philosophies. Islamiyyat: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 46(1), 173–185. https://ejournal.ukm.my/islamiyyat/article/view/73742
Jeklic, M. A. (2023). Can you Trust your Lawyers Call? Legal Advisers Exhibit Myside Bias Resistant to Debiasing Interventions. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 20(2), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12350
Khaitan, T. (2019). Constitutional Directives: Morally Committed Political Constitutionalism. The Modern Law Review, 82(4), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12423
Kislowicz, H. (2018). Judging Religion and Judges Religions. Journal of Law and Religion, 33(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2018.10
Kumalo, S. H. (2021). Developing Epistemic Impartiality to Deliver on Justice in Higher Education South Africa. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 18(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979211048665
Levi, D. F. (2020). Protecting Fair and Impartial Courts: Reflections on Judicial Independence. Judicature, 104(2), 58–67. https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/protecting-fair-and-impartial-courts-reflections-on-judicial-independence/
Meers, J., Halliday, S., & Tomlinson, J. (2023). Why we Need to Rethink Procedural Fairness for the Digital Age and How we Should do it. In Research Handbook on Law and Technology (pp. 468–482). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803921327.00038
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Comput. Surv., 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
Mousourakis, G. (2025). Navigating the Duality of Law and Equity in the English Common Law Tradition BT - Traversing Legal Traditions: Perspectives on Comparative Law and Legal History. In G. Mousourakis (Ed.), Traversing Legal Traditions (pp. 207–246). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-94669-1_8
Murphy, T. (2019). Chapter 19: Natural Law and Natural Justice: a Thomistic Perspective. In Research Handbook on Natural Law Theory. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110044.00027
Olwig, K. R. (2019). The Landscape of Customary Law versus that of Natural Law. In Justice, power and the political landscape (pp. 11–32). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315878270-3/landscape-customary-law-versus-natural-law-kenneth-olwig
Patterson, J. J., & Huitema, D. (2019). Institutional Innovation in Urban Governance: The Case of Climate Change Adaptation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(3), 374–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2018.1510767
Pomaza-Ponomarenko, A., Leonenko, N., Cherniahivska, V., Lehan, I., & Puzanova, G. (2024). Dynamics of legal transformatins: Assessment of impact on society and analysis of determinations of changes in the legislative sphere. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7, 2024spe037. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe037
Riyadi, F., Remanda, A., Kasdi, A., & Marsal, A. (2025). Constitutional Ijtihad and the Reform of Islamic Family Law: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia and Egypt in Advancing SDG 16. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 26(02), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i02.11106
Rosen, L. (1981). Equity and Discretion in a Modern Islamic Legal System. Law & Society Review, 15(2), 217–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053603
Rozpedowski, J. K. (2020). Law, Secularism, and the Evolution of the ‘Human’ in International Legal Discourse and Global Governance BT - Why Religion? Towards a Critical Philosophy of Law, Peace and God. In D. Bunikowski & A. Puppo (Eds.), Why Religion? Towards a Critical Philosophy of Law, Peace and God (pp. 225–253). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35484-8_11
Safa’at, M. A. (2022). The Roles of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in Determining State-Religion Relations. Constitutional Review, 8(1), 113–150. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev815
Saleem, Q. U. A., Fatima, S., & Siddiqui, D. H. (2024). Islamic Governance in Legal Contexts: Navigating Challenges and Opportunities in Contemporary Administration. Journal of Law, Social and Management Sciences, 3(2), 8–17. https://jlsms.org/index.php/jlsms/article/view/67
Seema Gul, Riaz Ahmad, & Dr. Sami Ur Rahman. (2025). Constitutional Dualities: Reconciling Islamic Normativity with Common Law Principles in Hybrid Legal Systems. Indus Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 674–693. https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i2.1501
Shebaita, M. (2025). The General Principles of Law Recognised by Civilised Nations in Islamic Law. Liverpool Law Review, 46(2), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-025-09384-2
Siddiq, A., Mubin, M. U., Maula, I., Meidina, A. R., & Irsyad, M. (2024). Restrictions on Hajj Pilgrimage for Indonesian Congregation from the Perspective of Sadd al-Dzari’ah. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 7(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v7i1.9701
Siddiqi, A. A. (2021). Moral Epistemology and the Revision of Divine Law in Islam. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwab006
Tajdin, M. (2020). Sharia As State Law: An Analysis of alll Al-Fasa s Concept of The Objectives of Islamic Law. Journal of Law and Religion, 35(3), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2020.41
Valsan, R. (2019). The No-conflict Fiduciary Rule and the Rule against Bias in Judicial Review: A Comparison. European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance, 6(3), 233–272. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00602001
Zavrsnik, A. (2020). Criminal Justice, Artificial Intelligence Systems, and Human Rights. ERA Forum, 20(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yusuf Sani Abubakar, Rajali Haji Aji, Mpawenimana Abdallah Saidi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
