Dialectics of Fiqh al-Ikhtilāf
A Comparative Madhhab Analysis of Legal Pluralism in Contemporary Muslim Societies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.64995Keywords:
Legal Pluralism, Sociology of Islamic Law, Religious Authority and Power, Ethical Reconciliation Framework, Fiqh al-IkhtilafAbstract
Although the Islamic legal tradition recognizes diversity of opinion (ikhtilāf) as an integral, legitimate aspect of juristic reasoning, contemporary Muslim societies often face tensions when interpretive differences intersect with competing religious and sociopolitical authorities. Existing studies on fiqh al-ikhtilāf have largely remained within normative and descriptive discussions of classical legal theory and rarely examine how juristic diversity operates in contemporary social contexts. This article addresses this gap by examining ikhtilāf through a socio-legal and comparative madhhab perspective. The study employs qualitative, library-based research, combining textual analysis of classical jurisprudential sources from major Sunni madhhabs with socio-legal interpretation to explore how differences in legal reasoning are constructed, negotiated, and applied in contemporary Muslim discourse. The findings indicate that juristic disagreement arises not only from technical differences in linguistic interpretation or methods of istinbāṭ (legal derivation) but also from varying epistemological frameworks among madhhabs and their interaction with evolving social contexts and authority structures. Comparative analysis shows that classical madhhab traditions historically accommodated legal pluralism within a structured jurisprudential framework. In contrast, contemporary contestations often emerge when interpretive authority becomes fragmented. This article contributes to the sociology of Islamic law by proposing an ethical-jurisprudential framework grounded in fiqh al-ikhtilāf. The framework integrates madhhab diversity, legal pluralism, and ethical principles (akhlāq al-karīmah) as mechanisms for managing disagreement constructively. By reframing juristic diversity as an institutionalized form of legal pluralism rather than a source of division, the study highlights its potential role in strengthening social cohesion within contemporary Muslim societies.
References
Ahmad, N. N. (2018). Theorising the relationship between kalam and usul al-fiqh: the theological-legal epistemology of Sad al-Din al-Taftazani (d. 792/1390) [University of Oxford]. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:3b1c3417-c628-492c-8986-23734521b410
Ahmed, H. (2025). Islamic Normative Legal Theory: Framework and Applications. Journal of Law and Religion, 40(1), 28–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2025.10056
Al-Marakeby, M. (2022). Rethinking Modern Fatwa Typology: An Ethnographic Study on al-Azhar Fatwa Council. Islamic Studies Review, 1(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.56529/isr.v1i2.85
Alaoudh, A. (2018). Imagined Religious Institutions: Pre-Modern Hanbali Ulama in the Juristic Sphere from (850-1350). Electronic Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law (EJIMEL), 6, 1–29. http://www.ejimel.uzh.ch/
Albayrak, I. (2022). Modernity, Its Impact on Muslim World and General Characteristics of 19–20th-Century Revivalist–Reformists’ Re-Reading of the Quran. Religions, 13(5), 424. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13050424
Aliyah, N. F., & Yusuf, E. B. (2025). Dynamics of Contemporary Fatwa in the Social Context of Nationality: A Study of the Thought of Sahal Mahfudz and Yusuf Al-Qaradawi. Hikmah, 22(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.53802/hikmah.v22i1.460
Alkhan, A. M., Hassan, M. K., & Alsaadi, A. (2025). Rethinking Usul al-Fiqh in Islamic Finance: From Diversified Jurisprudential Schools to Unified Usul? Arab Law Quarterly, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10192
Allehbi, M. A. (2021). Law and Sovereignty: Criminal Justice in Premodern Islam. Vanderbilt University.
Alwi, M. (2023). Maslahah-Based Fatwa Formulation: The Indonesian Ulema Council’s Rejection of Mut’ah Marriage in the Context of Women’s Rights Protection. Parewa Saraq: Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review, 2(2), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.64016/parewasaraq.v2i2.41
Anshori, A. Y., & Abdurrahman, L. T. (2025). History of the Development of Mazhab, Fiqh and Usul Al-Fiqh: Reasoning Methodology in Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.25355
Apriantoro, M. S., Faradilla, S., Ashfahany, A. El, Maruf, A., & Aziza, N. A. (2024). Quantifying Intellectual Terrain: Islamic Jurisprudence, Ethical Discourse, and Scholarly Impact. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 36(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v36i1.4367
Awad, R. S. (2025). Doctrinal Pluralism and Its Impact on Shaping the Identity of the Islamic Judicial System (132–923 AH/ 750–1517 AD). International Journal of Islamic Thought, 28. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.28.2025.343
Azwarfajri, A., Sa’dan, S., Zakaria, S., & Yusuf, M. (2025). The Construction of Contemporary Maqasid: A Paradigm Shift from Textual to Contextual Approaches. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 5(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.22373/jpi.v5i2.32960
Benda-Beckmann, K. von, & Turner, B. (2018). Legal Pluralism, Social Theory, and the State. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674
Bennett, W. Lance, & Kneuer, Marianne. (2024). Communication and democratic erosion: The rise of illiberal public spheres. European Journal of Communication, 39(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231217378
Bulan, J., Imammadi, T., Ryskiyeva, A., & Kuranbek, A. (2025). Abu Hanifa: Architect of Islamic Moderatism in Contemporary Contexts. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 15(2), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.152.14
Daud, Z. F. M. (2021). Fiqh Across Madhhabs: An Alternative to Pesantren Students’ School of Thought Exclusivism in the Post-Truth Era. Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 20(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v20i1.3081
Deniz, B. (2025). Beyond Interest: The Legal Development of Bay al-Wafa in Hanafi Legal Thought. Religions, 16(7), 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070832
Elmahjub, E. (2021). Islamic Jurisprudence as an Ethical Discourse: An Enquiry into the Nature of Moral Reasoning in Islamic Legal Theory. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa023
Fachrurozi, & Mohammad Subhi. (2024). The Early Development of Islamic Law: Examining the Rational and Flexible Nature of Compilation and Standardization. Jurnal Fuaduna: Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 8(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.30983/fuaduna.v8i1.8400
Faizi, H. F. S., & Ali, H. S. (2024). The Core Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence within Legal Theory: A Comprehensive Analysis. Online Journal of Research in Islamic Studies, 11(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.22452/ris.vol11no2.4
Fariana, A. (2021). Legal politics as a catalyst in forming sharia economic legal system in the Indonesia’s new order and reform era. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 21(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i2.197-212
Faris LC, S. (2025). Revisiting the Legacy of Islamic Legal Scholarship: The Influence of Sharia on Contemporary Legal Systems. Journal of Islamic Law and Legal Studies, 2(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.70063/-.v2i1.56
Gad Makhlouf, A. (2023). Continuity and Change of Traditional Islamic Law in Modern Times: tarjih as a Method of Adaptation and Development of Legal Doctrines. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad010
Ghanem, T. (2020). Texts, Language, and History in the Madhab-Law Tradition: A Study of the Shafii School [The American University in Cairo]. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1605
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An Introduction to Islamic Law. McGill University. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801044
Hefni, W., Mustofa, I., & Ahmadi, R. (2025). Looking for Moderate Fiqh: The Thought of Mohammad Hashim Kamali on the Reformation of Rigidity and Inflexibility in Islamic Law. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.10694
Ibrahim, A. H., & Harun, M. S. (2024). Applying the Concepts of Benefit and Harm in Malaysian Bioethical Discourse: Analysis of Malaysian Fatwa. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 21(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10345-z
Idrus, A. M., Mustafa, A., & Asti, M. J. (2022). Pengembangan Moderasi Mazhab di Kalangan Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum UINAM: Relevansi Pemikiran Islam Moderat. KURIOSITAS: Media Komunikasi Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 15(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v15i1.2923
Ikhsan, M. (2016). Membedah Faktor-faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Ikhtilaf di Kalangan Ulama. Nukhbatul Ulum, 2(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v2i1.10
Juwaini, J., Yasin, T. H., & Anzaikhan, M. (2021). The Role of Islamic Universities in the Harmony of the Madhhab (Resolution of the Aswaja and Wahabism Conflicts in Aceh). Millati: Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities, 6(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.18326/mlt.v6i2.6148
Kamal, M. Y. (2025). Dialectics and Jurisprudence: A case study on the Interplay of Usul al-Fiqh and Munazara in Nur-al-Anwar. International Confrence on Debate & Dialogue, 0–22. https://doi.org/10.57945/manara.30597854
Kamali, M. H. (2020). Ijtihad Maqasidi. In Actualization (Taf’il) of the Higher Purposes (Maqasid) of Shariah (pp. 18–20). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19prr6v.10
Karimullah, S. S. (2022). Shafii Literature in Indonesia: A Historical Account. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2022.17.1.1-19
Kasim, F. M., & Nurdin, A. (2020). Study of sociological law on conflict resolution through Adat in Aceh community according to Islamic law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 4(2), 375–397. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.8231
Khasan, M. (2021). From Textuality To Universality The Evolution of Hirabah Crimes in Islamic Jurisprudence. Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 59(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.591.1-32
Khori, A., Setiawan, S., Said, B., & Qulyubi, M. M. (2025). Dynamics of Islamic Legal Thought: Comparison of the Concept of Maqashid Al-shariah in Madhhab Zaidiyah and Jafariyah. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 37(2), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.11814
Kluttz, D. N. (2019). The Path of the Law Review: How Interfield Ties Contribute to Institutional Emergence and Buffer against Change. Law & Society Review, 53(1), 239–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12393
Komath, M. (2025). Rational Force of Analogy/Qiyas in Law: Logic of Law in Islamic and Contemporary Legal Reasoning. Informal Logic, 45(3), 423–448. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v45i3.10212
Kooria, M. (2018). Using the Past and Bridging the Gap: Premodern Islamic Legal Texts in New Media. Law and History Review, 36(4), 993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738248018000329
Kumar, R. (2025). The Moral Foundations of Legal Systems: A SocioLegal Analysis in Indian and Global Contexts. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202505.1836.v1
Kurnaz, S. (2023). The Search for Originality within Established Boundaries—Rereading Najm al-Din al-Tufi (d. 716/1316) on Public Interest (maslahah) and the Purpose of the Law. Religions, 14(12), 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121522
Little, J. J. (2022). The Hadith of Aishah’s Marital Age: a study in the evolution of early Islamic historical memory [University of Oxford]. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:1bdb0eea-3610-498b-9dfd-cffdb54b8b9b
Makhlouf, A. G. (2020). Evolution of Islamic Law in the 20th Century: The Conception of Collective Ijtihad in the Debate Between Muslim Scholars. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 9(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa019
Matczak, M. (2018). Why Judicial Formalism is Incompatible with the Rule of Law. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 31(1), 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2018.3
Mohiuddin, A. (2023). Religious Authority in Islam: Resilient Patterns of Evolution From the Formative Period to Contemporary Times. In Navigating Religious Authority in Muslim Societies (pp. 117–163). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44825-6_4
Okumus, F. (2025). Madhabs in Context: A Study on Approaches on Nursi and Al-Sharani on Unifying Islamic Law Schools. Cekmece Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 27, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.55483/cekmece.1701301
Oluwaseun, S. S. (2022). An Examination of The Major Madhhabs: A Case for Reunification. Journal of Shariah Law Research, 7(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.22452/jslr.vol7no2.1
Olyanasab, S. Z., Olyanasab, S. M., & Nabavi, S. M. (2022). A Review and Critique of the Theory of the Speculativeness of the Implication (Zanni al-Dilala) of the Quran. Religious Inquiries, 11(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.22034/RI.2022.248925.1437
Saeed, A., & Akbar, A. (2021). Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Quran. Religions, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527
Safitri, O. I., & Bin-Maswar, M. S. (2024). Women’s Impact on Islamic Heritage: Analyzing the Contribution of Female Companions in Hadith Narrations in Basrah. Aqwal: Journal of Quran and Hadies Studies, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v5i1.7126
Saif, M. A. (2024). The Interplay of Law and Social Norms: Analyzing the Evolution of Legal Systems. Fari Journal of Social Sciences and Law, 1(1), 1–12.
Salim, A. (2021). Adat and Islamic Law in Contemporary Aceh, Indonesia: Unequal Coexistence and Asymmetric Contestation. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.11082
Setiawan, R. A. (2023). Impact of Islamic Jurisprudential on Traditional Financial Customs and Legal Integration in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 13(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.132.13
Sharif, D., Mohamed @ Haji Daud, N., Wan Jusoh, W. N. H., Ishak, A. H., & Ismail, F. A. (2020). The Methodology of Comparative School of Thought on al-Rahn Discussion: A Reference to the Selected Islamic Jurisprudence Classical Books. Afkar: Jurnal Akidah Dan Pemikiran Islam, Special Issue 1, 47–78. https://doi.org/10.22452/afkar.sp2020no1.3
Solikin, N., & Wasik, M. (2023). The Construction of Family Law in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia: A Review of John Rawls’s Concept of Justice and Jasser Auda’s Maqashid al-Sharia. Ulumuna, 27(1), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.708
Syatar, A., Abubakar, A., Amiruddin, M. M., Mundzir, C., & Bakry, M. (2022). Integrating Wasthiyah Paradigm to the Issuance of COVID-19 Fatwa; Indonesia Case. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 20(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.31941/PJ.V20I1.1717
Tanzilulloh, M. I., & Mun’im Saleh, A. (2022). The Conceptualization of Religious Moderation in Islamic Economic Jurisprudence: A Study of Al-Risalah by Imam Al-Shafii. Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law, 2(2), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v2i2.10379
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Said Syarifuddin Abu Baedah, Mukhamad Hadi Musolin , Nurlaelah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
