Restorative Justice in Legal Pluralism
A Socio-Legal and Comparative Madhhab Study of Homicide Settlement in Arfak Indigenous Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.65061Keywords:
Customary Law, Arfak, Legal Pluralism, Comparative Law, Criminal Law ReformAbstract
This study examines the intersection between Arfak customary justice in West Papua and Islamic criminal law in the settlement of homicide cases within Indonesia’s plural legal system. Contemporary criminal justice discourse increasingly highlights tensions between state-centered retributive justice and indigenous restorative mechanisms rooted in communal reconciliation. Although the Indonesian Constitution recognizes customary law communities, the formal criminal justice system continues to prioritize legal positivism, often overlooking the sociocultural and spiritual values embedded in indigenous legal traditions. Employing a socio-legal and comparative madhhab approach, this study investigates how the Arfak customary mechanism operates as living law through deliberation, compensation (bayar kepala), and reconciliation rituals designed to restore social harmony and communal balance. The findings reveal substantial similarities between the Arfak model and the Islamic doctrines of qiṣāṣ and diyāt, particularly in the Shāfiʿī and Ḥanbalī madhhabs, which emphasize forgiveness, compensation, and reconciliation as essential components of justice. The Arfak restorative framework also aligns with the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, especially ḥifẓ al-nafs (protection of life) and ḥifẓ al-ummah (protection of community cohesion). Furthermore, comparative analysis demonstrates parallels with indigenous restorative justice systems in New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and Rwanda, where customary reconciliation has been institutionally integrated into criminal justice. This study argues that incorporating indigenous restorative principles into Indonesia’s criminal law reform represents a model of managed legal pluralism that preserves state authority while recognizing socially legitimate customary norms. It contributes to comparative Islamic criminal law by proposing a hybrid framework that integrates customary justice, comparative madhhab perspectives, restorative justice, and constitutional criminal law within a human rights-oriented legal system.
References
Absar, Absar Aftab. (2020). Restorative Justice in Islam with Special Reference to the Concept of Diyya. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 3(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516606920927277
Arifin, F., Astawa, I. G. P., Maarif, I., Sulastri, D., & Abdullah, M. K. (2025). Recognition of Customary Norms Within the Framework of Indonesian Legal Positivism. Khazanah Hukum, 7(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i1.39409
Arifin, Z., Neli, Yacob, F., & Abdussalam, I. (2025). Transformation of Ijtihad of Nusantara Ulama in the Formulation of A Compilation of Sharia Economic Law from A Maslahah Perspective. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 9(3), 1993–2012. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v9.i3.8324
Arrasyid, F., Pagar, Tanjung, D., & Mohd Nor, M. R. (2023). The Progressivity of Umar Ibn Al-Khattabs Ijtihad in Responding to Community Social Changes. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 8, 21–36. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v8i1.4872
Azisa, N., Muin, A. M., Munandar, M. A., Mukhlis, M. M., & Rahman, A. A. (2025). Psychological Recovery of Crime Victims within Contemporary Restorative Justice: An Islamic Legal Perspective. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1098–1127. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11184
Bowling, R. (2022). The Experiences of Maori Prison Officers in Aotearoa New Zealands Prison System. Victoria University of Wellington.
Braithwaite, J. (2001). Restorative Justice & Responsive Regulation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195136395.001.0001
Bronsther, J. (2021). The Corrective Justice Theory of Punishment. Virginia Law Review, 107(2), 227–279. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27135576
Brunke, L. I. (2024). Murder, Gender and the Law: from Crime of Passion to Femicide. Crime, Law and Social Change, 82(5), 1313–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10181-7
Butt, S. (2023). Indonesias new Criminal Code: Indigenising and Democratising Indonesian Criminal Law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772
Butt, S., & Murharjanti, P. (2022). What constitutes Compliance? Legislative Responses to Constitutional Court Decisions in Indonesia. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 20(1), 428–453. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moac014
Chen, J. (2026). Theoretical Sources of Rawlss Justice as Fairness: Kant, Hegel and Mill. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 26(76), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.52685/cjp.26.76.7
Darmawan, J. B., Suhariadi, F., Widjojo, S., Amiati, M., & Abdullah, A. H. (2025). Incorporating islah principles into restorative justice: Bridging contemporary legal practice and Islamic values. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 269–294. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10435
Faisal, Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., & Manik, J. D. N. (2026). Seeking Certainty in Uncertainty: Integrating Living Law into Indonesia’s Criminal Code to Harmonize Legal Pluralism and Indigenous Justice. Novum Jus, 20(1), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.14718/NOVUMJUS.2026.20.1.15
Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Darc Noviayanti Manik, J. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: rethinking penal reform within Indonesia New Criminal Code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634
Forsyth, M. (2024). The State of Contemporary Intergroup Conflict in the Papua New Guinea Highlands. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 17(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-09-2024-0938
Gcumeni, F. (2024). Reimagining Legal Pluralism in Africa: Balancing Indigenous, State, and Religious Laws, edited by Anthony C Diala and Christa Rautenbach. African Journal of Legal Studies, 16(4), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-bja10103
Gordon, G. (2019). Wedded to the states requirements: Restorative and community justice processes in Aotearoa/New Zealand. New Zealand Sociology, 34(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.456662564412552
Griffiths, J. (1986). What is Legal Pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387
Hamzani, A. I., Samian, S., & Khasanah, N. (2026). Restorative Justice and Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Implications for Atrocity Crimes and Global Criminal Justice Reform. International Criminal Law Review, 26(2), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-BJA10257
Haq, H. S., Wardiansyah, K., Maruf, M., & Johar, O. A. (2026). Customary Law in Lombok Island Forest Governance: Rationality, Legal Pluralism Critique, and Ecological Justice Pursuit. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 4(1), 313–339. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v4i1.196
Haq, I., Hannani, H., Syatar, A., Amiruddin, M. M., & Musmulyadi, M. (2024). Unlocking The Potential of Kalosara: An Extensive Analysis of Adultery Instances Dispute Resolution in the Tolaki Tribe through the Lens of al-Ishlah Concept. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i1.1488
Haq, I., Resi, R., Tahir, M. S., Ayuniyyah, Q., & Said, M. A. J. (2025). Legal Harmony: Integration of Customary, National, and Islamic Criminal Law in the Toraja Marambu Langi. AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial, 20(2), 559–587. https://doi.org/10.19105/al-lhkam.v20i2.17680
Hardinanto, A., Arief, B. N., Setiyono, J., Fernando, Z. J., & Sabrina, N. (2024). Critical Analysis of Living Law Formulation in Law No. 1 of 2023 Concerning the Criminal Code: Towards Law Reform to Realize Justice with the Spirit of Pancasila. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(3), 1029–1066. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.13923
Haz, M. A. J., Wathoni, L. M. N., Zulkarnain, Maghfurrahman, M., & Baldan Haramin, F. (2024). Restorative Justice: A New Approach to Resolving Domestic Violence. Jurnal Al-Dustur, 7(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.30863/aldustur.v7i2.7399
Idrus, A. M., Hasan, H., Asti, M. J., Taudiyah, N. T., & Halim, P. (2022). Philosophy of Tashri Review on Internalization Maja Labo Dahu in The Legal System of The Sultanate of Bima. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam, 12(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2022.12.1.108-128
Irwansyah, A. Y. (2021). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Edisi Revisi) (4th ed., Vol. 4). Mirra Buana Media.
Irwin, T. (2019). Nicomachean Ethics. Hackett Publishing.
Jezierska, K. (2019). With Habermas Against Habermas. Deliberation Without Consensus. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 15(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.326
Jzani, M. R. (2025). The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice in Resolving Criminal Acts: Interaction Between Ocu Customary Law and Positive Law. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 10(3), 394–414. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v10i3.12234
Kamaruddin, Iswandi, Yaqub, A., Mahfiana, L., & Akbar, M. (2023). Justice, Mediation, and Kalosara Custom of the Tolaki Community in Southeast Sulawesi from the Perspective of Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 7(2), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.13183
Kasenda, D., Alkatiri, Z., Setyani, T. I., & Tjahjandari, L. (2026). From Wim to Wene: Bakar Batu as a Performative Epistemology of Conflict Classification in Indigenous Papuan Peacebuilding. Journal of Daoist Studies, 19(2), 37–52. https://journalofdaoiststudies.org/index.php/journal/article/view/253
Khamim, K., Rizal, M. C., & Mustakim, A. A. (2025). Convergence of Restorative Justice and al-‘Afwu: Reforming Criminal Procedure Law in Indonesia. Justicia Islamica, 22(2), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v22i2.9807
Kridasakti, S. W., Rizkiana, R. E., Wahyuni, P. M., Senastri, N. M. J., & Yuningsih, H. (2025). The Legitimacy Crisis of Customary Villages under Indonesia’s Village Law. Sriwijaya Law Review, 9(2), 432–456. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.v9i2.3998
Lesmana, C. T., Sulistiani, L., Putri, N. S., & Dewi, D. A. (2026). Participatory Rational Justice in Criminal Law Reform as an Integrative Theory for Substantive Justice and Social Legitimacy. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 9(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v9i1.15585
Maruf, D. M., Nugroho, H., Prayitno, K. P., & Wahyudi, S. (2026). The Strengthening the Institutionalization of Customary Law in Indonesias Judicial System: An Integrative Legal Framework Approach. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 14(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v14i1.1936
Mansur, T. M., Muazzin, M., Abdullah, M. A., Ali, H., Usman, M. Bin, & Miranti, A. (2025). Mediating Tradition: The Role of Law Enforcement in Customary Law Disputes. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 13(2), 1183–1208. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.1921
Martin, J. (2023). White Cultural Imperialism and the New Zealand Criminal Justice System: Importance of Insider Voices. New Zealand Sociology, 38(2), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.337264058990862
Mashdurohatun, A., Harahsheh, E. A. A. M., Datuiding, M. I., Syambas, A. H., & Wibowo, P. A. (2026). Contemporary Reassessment of Punishment in Islamic and Secular Law: A Comparative Study of Justice and Penal Philosophy. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 5(1), 80–100. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.11887
Masyhar, A., Aisy, R., Widyawati, A., Maskur, M. A., & Murtadho, A. (2025). Reclaiming the Unwritten: Living Laws Prospects under Indonesia’s 2023 Penal Reform. Jambe Law Journal, 8(1), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v8i1.502
Merino, R. (2018). Re-politicizing participation or reframing environmental governance? Beyond indigenous prior consultation and citizen participation. World Development, 111, 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.025
Mohas, M., Rofiana, R., Jastisia, M., Anwar, J., & Risyawan, A. (2025). Legality and Controversy: The Death Penalty in Indonesia From the Perspectives of Islamic Law, Criminal Law and Human Rights. Tirtayasa Journal of International Law, 4(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.51825/tjil.v4i1.32713
Mubayyinah, F., Handayani, F., & Sifa, M. A. (2025). Legal Pluralism, Epistemic Tensions, and the Reformulation of the Adultery Offense in Indonesia’s New Penal Code. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 8(2), 573–594. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.14957
Murhula, P. B. B., & Tolla, A. D. (2020). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices on victims of crime: Evidence from South Africa. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 10(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.739374950657425
Napsiah, Muryanti, & Wijanti, Y. T. (2024). Inequality as a Construct of Customary Law: Access to Home Ownership Rights of Women in Lampung. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 7(1), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.22456
Nascimento, A. M., Andrade, J., & de Castro Rodrigues, A. (2023). The Psychological Impact of Restorative Justice Practices on Victims of Crimes—a Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 24(3), 1929–1947. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082085
Nasution, T. A. S., & Lubis, Z. (2026). Between Reconciliation and Justice: Reactualizing As-Sulh in Resolving Juvenile Violence within Indonesias Legal Pluralism. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam, 11(2), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.30863/ajmpi.v11i2.11560
Nemeth, C. P. (2022). Criminal Law: Historical, Ethical, and Moral Foundations. Routledge.
Nnodim, P., & Okigbo, A. (2020). Justice as fairness and Ubuntu: Conceptualizing justice through human dignity. Ethical Perspectives, 27(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.27.1.3288829
Patittingi, F. (2012). Dimensi hukum pulau-pulau kecil di Indonesia: studi atas penguasaan dan pemilikan tanah. Rangkang Education.
Philona, R., & Awaludin. (2025). Constitutional Values and Restorative Justice: A Critical Analysis in the Indonesian Context. KARSA Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 33(1), 241–271. https://ejournal.uinmadura.ac.id/index.php/karsa/article/view/20264
Pide, A. S. M. (2017). Hukum Adat Dahulu, kini, dan akan datang. Prenada Media.
Pratt, J. (1996). Colonization, Power and Silence: a History of Indigenous Justice in New Zealand Society. In Restorative justice: International perspectives. Criminal Justice Press Monsey, NY.
Puspito, B., & Masyhar, A. (2023). Dynamics of Legality Principles in Indonesian National Criminal Law Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i1.64078
Putra, A., Raspati, L., Rachman, T., & Kurniawan, I. (2026). Living Law on The Margins: A Critical Review of Article 2 of The 2023 Indonesian Penal Code. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 15(1), 81–110. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.15.1.2026.81-110
Rahman, K., Lestari, A. A., & Suryoutomo, M. (2026). The Urgency of the Confidentiality Principle in Restorative Justice Mechanisms. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 8(1), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v8n1.p221-249
Rawls, J. (2017). A Theory of Justice. In Applied ethics (pp. 21–29). Routledge.
Roberts, T. (2023). Theorizing a Restorative Response to Homicide. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 58(2), 789.
Rozah, U., & Yudistira, A. (2025). Penal Policy Analysis of The Formulation of Customary Law in The 2023 KUHP. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 10(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v10i1.19939
Rusdi, M. A., Pradana, S. A., Pikahulan, R. M., Shabri, F. N. S., & Achmad, D. (2024). The Kings Decree: Integration of Customary Law and Islamic Law in the Clove Lease Agreement. Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 24(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v24i1.97-118
Sandel, M. (2005). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. In Debates in contemporary political philosophy (pp. 150–169). Routledge.
Sanjaya, A. W., Kristanto, K., Mohamed, N., Firmanto, T., & Achsoni, R. (2026). Normative Critique of Passive Money Laundering Formulation in Indonesian Criminal Law: An Islamic Proportionality Perspective. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 560–590. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.82
Saputra, K., Saefudin, Y., Soediro, Rusli, H., & Armansyah. (2026). Communal Justice for Environmental Sustainability in Indonesia’s New Criminal Code: Challenges in Law Enforcement. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 4(1), 161–207. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v4i1.221
Sarmadi, A. S., Hafidzi, A., Mohlis, Yunin, O., & Korniienko, M. (2025). Negotiating Islamic Law and Customary Practice: Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat and Restorative Justice in Banjar Inheritance Disputes. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syirah, 23(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v23i2.3673
Shcherbanyuk, O., Gordieiev, V., & Bzova, L. (2023). Legal Nature of the Principle of Legal Certainty as a Component Element of the Rule of Law. Tribuna Juridica, 13(1), 21–31. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1222655
Stewart, L., Thompson, J., Beaudette, J. N., Buck, M., Laframboise, R., & Petrellis, T. (2018). The Impact of Participation in Victim-Offender Mediation Sessions on Recidivism of Serious Offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(12), 3910–3927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X17752274
Suhardi, M. (2025). Legal Pluralism and Cultural Legitimacy: Reframing Sasak Customary Law to Prevent Child Marriage in Lombok. Society, 13(1), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v13i1.818
Susiati, S. (2020). Emosi Verbal Suku Bajo Sampela.
Syatar, A., Anugra, R., Hasan, H., Izzah, I., & Hammad, H. A. A. (2025). Revitalizing the Paoppangi Tanah Customary Sanction in Sulawesi, Indonesia: A Fiqh Jinayah Perspective. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 25(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i2.257-278
Widjajanto, A., Astawa, I. G. P., & Rulyandi, M. (2025). Decolonising Restorative Justice in Indonesia: a Comparative Study Across Customary Law traditions. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 33(2), 470–492. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.40481
Widyawati, A., Adhari, A., Masyhar, A., Deo Syahputra, B., Purnomo, D., Widyawati, A., Adhari, A., Masyhar, A., Syahputra, B. D., & Purnomo, D. (2025). Dynamics of the Penitentiary System, Transparent and Accountable Handling of Criminal Cases in Criminal Execution Law in Southeast Asia: Convergence and Divergence of International Perspectives. Indonesia Law Review, 15(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v15n1.1
Wilson, R. J., Huculak, B., & McWhinnie, A. (2002). Restorative Justice Innovations in Canada. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSL.498
Yaqin, A., Muhid, Saude, Taufiq, M., & Aouich, A. (2026). Institutionalizing Moderate Islamic Legal Reasoning: An Istinbat Framework for Contemporary Islamic Law. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 11(1), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v11i1.11266
Yustia, D. A., Jodi, F. F., Panjaitan, A. C. D., & Hassan, F. M. (2026). Restorative Justice: Finding Common Ground Between Justice and Shared Interests. Jambura Law Review, 1(1), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v1i1.32646
Zarkasi, M. F., Azisa, N., & Haeranah. (2022). Implications of Renewal System of Criminal Justice Based on the Principles of Restorative Justice on The Role of Probation and Parole Officer. Khazanah Hukum, 4(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i1.17354
Zehr, H. (2015). The Little Book of Restorative Justice: Revised and Updated. Simon and Schuster.
Interview
District Court Judge of Manokwari. Interview. Manokwari, Indonesia, December 15, 2025.
Indigenous Community Members of the Arfak Tribe (Families of Offenders and Victims Involved in Customary Dispute Resolution). Interview. Manokwari, Indonesia, December 11, 2025.
Traditional Leaders and Members of the Arfak Customary Council. Interview. Manokwari, Indonesia, December 11, 2025.
Traditional Leaders and Members of the Arfak Customary Council. Interview. Manokwari, Indonesia, December 11, 2025.
Deputy Chief of the South Manokwari Regional Police. Interview. South Manokwari, Indonesia, December 16, 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alice Ance Bonggoibo, Andi Suriyaman Mustari Pide, Haeranah, Leonito Ribeiro, Andi Mulyono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
